Forums
May 03, 2024, 09:20 AM

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Senator

Pages: 1 ... 65 66 [67] 68 69 ... 97
991
Leagues Playoffs / Re: Classic League Clanner Playoffs #48
« on: February 18, 2016, 07:31 PM »
TdC vs l3x will be played when NiCo is back (next week). The deadline needs to be extended to Sunday 28th.

992
General discussion / Re: Streaming dem taps.
« on: February 18, 2016, 09:32 AM »
Your video is gone :P You need to tick "Archive broadcasts" checkbox from settings

993
Leagues Complaints / Re: 203573-20356
« on: February 15, 2016, 09:01 AM »


Actually we didn't reach a clear consensus on this one but the games will be void. This kind of case is quite rare (2vs2 funners turned into tus games while one player wasn't monitoring the game chat). Usually a player must know he is in a 2vs2 tus game after all the AG/lobby chats.

994
Leagues Complaints / Re: 203573-20356
« on: February 12, 2016, 08:58 AM »
What we learned here:

[Riaan-Marais] TUS Confirmed
[William1977] tus confirmed

I still didn't get answer to the question how would all 3 players benefit from cheating someone, though.

995
Leagues Complaints / Re: 203573-20356
« on: February 11, 2016, 04:24 PM »
By not voiding it you are creating a way for people to cheat, now that people know they can get away with this, who is to stop people from doing it? (3 out of 4 people could simply say they agreed to TUS in order to get free points).

How would all 3 cheaters get free points again? That's not irrelevant :D

In this case messi didn't confirm his partner is on radar and paid the price for it (he lost as many points as Walrus did).

You like examples so here is one:

You and Walrus are looking for 2vs2 tus bng on AG
I agree with VoK in PM that we will play but VoK won't say a word about tus to u
I say "wait I ask VoK" to u on AG and a moment later "ok let's do 2vs2 tus bng"
Then we lose the game and VoK says he thought it was a funner

Hands up who would have confirmed from VoK individually that he is aware he is playing tus?

This Walrus case is a bit different though and MI makes or made the final call.

996
Leagues Complaints / Re: 203573-20356
« on: February 11, 2016, 11:42 AM »
So technically I could grab 2 friends, play a funner with some newcomer who doesn't know any better, report it as TuS as long as me and the 2 other people agreed on TuS?

Then one of u would agree on losing along with a guy who has no clue he is playing a tus game. Would u be willing to play along with a such guy?

It's THEIR fault for assuming walrus agreed, unless they can provide evidence that walrus agreed to play TuS, these games should definitely 100% be void.

Eh. messi represented team messi&Walrus. AnGsT and Degox had all the reason to assume they were playing a tus game after messi said "ye this is tus".

997
Leagues Complaints / Re: 203573-20356
« on: February 11, 2016, 10:39 AM »
We got the proofs we needed for the 2vs2 games. 3 of 4 agreed on tus in the game so the only question is can your partner make the decision for u if u don't say anything. It would be unfair towards AnGsT and Degox if they couldn't complain about the games afterwards but u could (it's like u played without a risk of losing while they did have a risk). Therefore it's up to them if the games will be voided.

As for the 1vs1 games, we didn't get proofs so we treat them as funners by default. The burden of proof is not on you.

And btw, the way u played in the games doesn't prove anything. Only hard facts matter :P

998
Leagues Playoffs / TEL Playoffs #24
« on: February 10, 2016, 07:29 PM »
https://www.tus-wa.com/leagues/TEL-playoffs/?s=24



Quarterfinals

Almog (1) vs Hussar (8)
vesuvio (4) vs Senator (5)

MaStEr (3) vs dibz (6)
Spoon_head (2) vs style (7)

Semifinals

Almog (1) vs Senator (5)
Spoon_head (2) vs MaStEr (3)

Final

Almog (1) vs MaStEr (3)



Final deadline: Sunday 2016-03-13



Use this thread to arrange your games. No effort before the deadline = disqualification.

999
Leagues Playoffs / Re: Classic League Singles Playoffs #48
« on: February 10, 2016, 02:21 PM »
Sen tomorrow at 12 gmt?

Tomorrow at 12 gmt?

1000
Leagues Playoffs / Re: Classic League Clanner Playoffs #48
« on: February 09, 2016, 03:22 PM »
l3x, this Sunday 19 gmt?


Edit: Saturday 19 gmt?

1001
Leagues Playoffs / Classic League Singles Playoffs #48
« on: February 08, 2016, 08:27 PM »
https://www.tus-wa.com/leagues/classic-playoffs/?s=48



Quarterfinals

dibz (1) vs NiCo` (8)
RIP (4) vs messi (5)

daiNa (3) vs Degox (6)
Sbaffo (2) vs Senator (7)

Semifinals

dibz (1) vs messi (5)
Sbaffo (2) vs daiNa (3)

Final

dibz (1) vs Sbaffo (2)



Final deadline: Wednesday 2016-03-23 (14 days)



Use this thread to arrange your games. Please let us know if you can't play before the deadline. No response by the deadline = disqualification.

1002
Leagues Complaints / Re: Wrongly reported
« on: February 07, 2016, 09:35 AM »
Hello,

Do you have 2 account on TUS? (Riaan-Marais and william1977)

Apparently they are using the same computer (according to Sensei)

1003
Leagues Playoffs / Classic League Clanner Playoffs #48
« on: February 07, 2016, 08:29 AM »
https://www.tus-wa.com/leagues/classic-playoffs/?s=48;style=clanner



Semifinals

TdC (1) vs l3x (4)
cFc (2) vs dt (3)

Final

l3x (4) vs cFc (2)



Final deadline: Wednesday 2016-03-23 (14 days)



Use this thread to arrange your games. No response by the deadline = disqualification.

1004
Leagues Complaints / Re: Game #203764
« on: February 06, 2016, 03:58 PM »
The first game started 11:03:38 GMT and it took 5mins 40s. Therefore the 2nd game would have started sometime after 11:09:18 GMT. The season ended 11:13 GMT. I doubt they could have finished the game in time (finish time decides the season).

btw, there's still Walrus' complaint that might affect messi's points.

1005
General discussion / Re: Roping without delay!!! MOTHER OF GOD
« on: February 05, 2016, 09:45 AM »
Then howcome it makes absolutely no difference in my speed with it on or off? And I can still rope faster than most people yet i've lost so much timing/reaction speed since around 2000-2003 era...

You can rope fast with vsync on, it's just awkward to control. Maybe that explains why u have lost your timing ;D You should be able see the difference even in menus when u move your mouse.

If u can't see any difference, that means you have vsync forced on/off in graphic card settings or u have a weird computer :D

Pages: 1 ... 65 66 [67] 68 69 ... 97