Quote from: DeathInFire on December 14, 2011, 12:20 AM^^'
I think this thread exploits more than it helps. xD
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
#181
General discussion / Re: Markings on your monitor- okay or not?
December 14, 2011, 12:58 AM #182
General discussion / Re: Markings on your monitor- okay or not?
December 13, 2011, 11:21 PM
Ghost ne1 ?
#183
General discussion / Re: Markings on your monitor- okay or not?
December 13, 2011, 05:42 PM
I agree with Anu there.

#184
Tech Support / Re: LAG PROBLEMS
December 07, 2011, 07:32 PM
@AlTarf: You're welcome. Great to know we'll get another opponent on Wormnet. :p
@Shyguy: I'm sorry, I don't have any clues more.
@Shyguy: I'm sorry, I don't have any clues more.

#185
Tech Support / Re: LAG PROBLEMS
December 07, 2011, 04:52 PM
I guess it's just a prob of Windows setting.
#186
Tech Support / Re: LAG PROBLEMS
December 07, 2011, 04:42 PM
There are 7 checkboxes: check the 4, 5 & 6.
#187
Tech Support / Re: LAG PROBLEMS
December 07, 2011, 03:50 PMQuote from: StepS on December 07, 2011, 01:10 PMI don't have any problems with them.
I don't recommend the two first checkboxes in the Palette Fix
#188
Tech Support / Re: LAG PROBLEMS
December 07, 2011, 02:14 PM #189
Off Topic / Re: Music Video thread
December 07, 2011, 12:37 AM
Roflmao HHC, do you understand what he is saying (Alcest) ?
And it sounds so bad, not credible. English is much better to sing: that's the reason why I hate French Rock. ^^'
PS: If you like this kind of music, just listen to Aereogramme (or the well known Sigur Ros).
And it sounds so bad, not credible. English is much better to sing: that's the reason why I hate French Rock. ^^'
PS: If you like this kind of music, just listen to Aereogramme (or the well known Sigur Ros).

#190
Schemes / Re: Comparison of T17 schemes (for MI)
December 07, 2011, 12:21 AM
I neither have a problem with it, I don't even play anymore ftm.
And I used to play this T17 scheme and will in the future.
It's just that Shy is right, and if you want a non luck-based T17, there are many changes which can be done in this direction.
It's so much work to find it replays...
You didn't get "angry", but pissed of the situation (is the same on this context).
Putting some schemes in this free league is like putting them in the garbage.
If you really want them to be more active, then put them in classic league, so everybody will have to play them if their opponent pick it.
Free league isn't as well seen as Classic one.
About intermediate, yeah it's a bit lucky since there is auto placement.
But except in really rare cases, you can take the game back if you play well (but there are handicaps !).
Bungee and Battle Race aren't luck scheme, that's why I love them.
And if I said "Bungee & Battle Race ftw !", it's just cause I love them and I'd like to get them in classic league.
Nothing with the luck based argumentation.
About the expression, yeah it was for you, but I really don't know how to express it more than I did. <.<
It's an expression easy to say, but impossible to apply.
A says: I didn't do it on purpose ! (ex: I didn't broke the ming on purpose.)
B answers: So/then, deliberately don't do it. (ex: Then, deliberatly don't break the ming.)
It's impossible to not do it deliberatly, since it wasn't on purpose. Get the thing ?
And I used to play this T17 scheme and will in the future.
It's just that Shy is right, and if you want a non luck-based T17, there are many changes which can be done in this direction.
Quote from: MonkeyIsland on December 06, 2011, 07:16 PMRofl, I really expected that you remembered it. -.-
Please do. I'd love to see my "anger". Also it gives me another review where I went wrong in that game, not to mention that I like the angry part, it means that I care for my game result.
It's so much work to find it replays...
You didn't get "angry", but pissed of the situation (is the same on this context).
Quote from: MonkeyIsland on December 06, 2011, 07:16 PMWe can balance it everytime, why don't we do ? You're letting the balance to the luck.
As it can happen that your opponent collect good super weapons (like albino did in that game), it also can happen in a balancing way. Your opponent can collect 2 bows while you get a uzi and suicide bomber. Your opponent attacks and gets 200hp from you. Now a ming for you could even things out. Although lowering super weapons seems reducing luck, but it although can result in an opposite way. This game salvation army helps me even things out.
Quote from: MonkeyIsland on December 06, 2011, 07:16 PMYou really mean this ? -.-
We created free league to give other schemes a chance to raise their skill-level and get more active/popular. Are you calling Intermediate a lucky scheme?
Since when bungee race and battle race are lucky schemes? Or did I got you all wrong?
Putting some schemes in this free league is like putting them in the garbage.
If you really want them to be more active, then put them in classic league, so everybody will have to play them if their opponent pick it.
Free league isn't as well seen as Classic one.
About intermediate, yeah it's a bit lucky since there is auto placement.
But except in really rare cases, you can take the game back if you play well (but there are handicaps !).
Bungee and Battle Race aren't luck scheme, that's why I love them.
And if I said "Bungee & Battle Race ftw !", it's just cause I love them and I'd like to get them in classic league.
Nothing with the luck based argumentation.
About the expression, yeah it was for you, but I really don't know how to express it more than I did. <.<
It's an expression easy to say, but impossible to apply.
A says: I didn't do it on purpose ! (ex: I didn't broke the ming on purpose.)
B answers: So/then, deliberately don't do it. (ex: Then, deliberatly don't break the ming.)
It's impossible to not do it deliberatly, since it wasn't on purpose. Get the thing ?
#191
Tech Support / Re: LAG PROBLEMS
December 06, 2011, 07:19 PM
I did something for my host problem, maybe it's this which removed the lags.
It was creating a new rule in the firewall (there shouldn't be any about W:A in the second section).
You can try this.
PS: About the checkboxes, you disabled everything except the 3 lasts of "parameter" ?
In addition, I'll give you the checkboxes to remove ingame, cause they also make the game lag depending on your computer setting.
Edit: In Advanced Setting of W:A (ingame), remove everything on the left checkboxes except those ones in the "palette fix" section (there, they are all checked).
It was creating a new rule in the firewall (there shouldn't be any about W:A in the second section).
You can try this.
PS: About the checkboxes, you disabled everything except the 3 lasts of "parameter" ?
In addition, I'll give you the checkboxes to remove ingame, cause they also make the game lag depending on your computer setting.
Edit: In Advanced Setting of W:A (ingame), remove everything on the left checkboxes except those ones in the "palette fix" section (there, they are all checked).
#192
Tech Support / Re: LAG PROBLEMS
December 06, 2011, 05:17 PM
My bad Steps, I missunderstood.
Anyway, thanks for the image (
): Shy, just check the 3 last of this "parameter" section.
Anyway, thanks for the image (

#193
Schemes / Re: Comparison of T17 schemes (for MI)
December 06, 2011, 05:05 PMQuote from: HHC on December 06, 2011, 03:03 PMI prefer a scheme that is fun to play. That first of all. With all weapons doing the same damage it's bound to end up a damn boring scheme.I'm having fun using nades because they can bounces on the floor, even if they deal max 46 dmgs.
Plus there are plenty of weapons which deals between 27dmgs & 60dmgs.
The more dmg a weapon does, the more fun you have ? I find it kindda weird.
Especially if I give you 50 different zooks which all deals different dmgs, do you still find it funny ?
I mean, you have fun thanks to the varity of weapons (the way you throw it, the way it exploses, etc..), not because of the dmgs they deal.
As a solution of removing the poor 3 super high weapons (I see only Nanas, Mings & Patxy atm) you really want to keep, we can lower the dmg they deal ?
PS: I totally agree with Shy.
In addition, why did we put some schemes in the "free league" ? 'Cause they had luck involved (yep, just remember of inter).
So if it's fine for you to get a league with luck-based scheme, I ask for the other schemes to be add in the classic league (Bungee & Battle Race ftw !).
PSS: MI, you can't control every crates your opponent collect.
If it's his turn, a crate appears, he collects the crate containing a SS: then you can do nothing.
Except maybe blocking all of his worms everytime, but should I remind you how lame it is ?
Moreover, should I remind you a T17 where you got angry 'cause I picked only super weapons (while only revolvers for you), and you died in like ... 4 turns ?
All this without being able to do anything ?
PSSS: Your argument is like "- I didn't do it on purpose ! - Then deliberately don't do it" to me (translated a french expression in english, I maybe made a mistake).
#194
General discussion / Re: Markings on your monitor- okay or not?
December 06, 2011, 04:52 PM
Nicely said.

#195
Tech Support / Re: LAG PROBLEMS
December 06, 2011, 03:01 PMQuote from: StepS on December 06, 2011, 02:40 PMhere it's like "Use 640x480 resolution"No ?

Quote from: StepS on December 06, 2011, 02:40 PMPS: Warning, there can be issues with creating/modifying a team when certain compatibility options are active.Np, since we only disable.

Anyway, let us know if it works Shy.