There isn't 4 Canadians. Bad idea lol
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Quote from: Casso on June 23, 2012, 09:46 PM
I think that noob bashers won't never set the status "Available to play" but they will wait for a noob which ask to play. Anyway i think that this idea is great (as i said to Statik)
Quote from: Professor on June 23, 2012, 09:31 PM
to be honest i didnt read this thread, just in some parts.
But i have an idea what i guess already was discussed in TUS.
It's about calling tus.
Nowadays, any player goes to ag and call "tus ne1?" or send pms for players who is online to play it.
The idea is create a menu "Leagues > Ask a game" in the website. If i want play some TUS, i set this feature and my nickname will appear in TUS Home Page with the status "Avaliable to play". So, wanna suppose Random saw my name there and he pressed a button "Accept TUS against Professor". Done. Its avoids a big part of avoiders / noob bashers because i cant choose my opponent.
I know, my idea is incomplete. Firstly, i want to know if my idea is good or not.
Quote from: ropa on June 23, 2012, 06:59 PM
I've been saying this for the last 5 years. Unanchored BnG takes care of most of the scheme problems. It's only those who know how to notch, which obviously happen to be the best BnGers who strongly argue agaisnt it. They are willing to give in in other forms of Bng scheme, but never to unanchored.
Quote from: easy on June 22, 2012, 06:13 PM
i think all scared es steal 1 of first 4 position hauahhuahau
u all continue to repeat avoid avoid avoid
and i say :
yes I DO!!
why put a rule where i must play against random or almog or whoevere .. or i must play against ALL or i play with i love play or i CAN play
u do yourself a lot of paranoies
btw i never come in PO so i dont care about it
Quote from: MonkeyIsland on June 22, 2012, 05:51 PM
An avoid could have a response with a free win so that it forces avoiders to get that game done but with the players available at the time of avoiding. (here comes in your evidence dub)
But more on this subject, I'm planning to code some additional requirement for PO and scheme medals: The player must have played n games versus x top players in that specific season.
Quote from: ropa on June 22, 2012, 10:30 AM
So can we have a response on this? It's been what? Weeks...
Quote from: Chelsea on June 22, 2012, 04:47 PMQuote from: Dub-c on June 22, 2012, 04:46 PM
Ok so, Chelsea, Jot, and easy.
Tomi & Scorpus were online but afk...
Quote from: MonkeyIsland on June 22, 2012, 04:16 AM
We don't have "gg" as it is over for a free win. For any free win, the opponent have one week to claim that game to be done.