GGz

I've extended deadline good number of times, but group 1 haven't played a single game yet. Can you put WormkoS and NEO.X into the knockout round since they have played good number of games? Faster the better obviously. =)
https://www.tus-wa.com/cups/cup-268/15/

I'm going to put any absurd, surreal, random, weird, and/or idoitic stuff in here. Enjoy! XD

Knockout is Bo5. Technically they already played a bo5 game in group matchup, but I guess It's up to dien if he wants one more chance or not. (Not really sure y he said cya.)

Very Good Games. I sure did awful on first 2 games though. XD

I believe admin function for Cup Games is simply not flexible enough. With confidence and certainly, I believe that players shouldn't advance evenly in each group beause some players may not play enough games and/or don't try to schedule a matchup with opoonent well enough to be elligible to advance to the knockout round. If we don't change this limitation, there's possibility that Cup games are going to lot less fair.

Check my cup example: https://www.tus-wa.com/cups/cup-256/
Matenga agreed to drop from the cup due to busy schedule and generousity. I believe dienadel85 definitely deserve to be in knockout round instead of huskov because he actually participated well in the tournament unlike good number of other players. I do not wish to switch players because it's already past the due date for group pairment. At Least, please put dienadel85 to the knockout round.

Please trust me in this. And here are examples, and I'm not saying every cup has to be like this. I just want cup admins to have more freedom on which players to advance to knockout round.

==Examples of Ranking of Advancement to Knockout Round== (Just my way of doing things.)

1st Example:

First Group
Player 1  3 wins 0 loss 1st
Player 2  2 wins 1 loss 2nd
Player 3  1 wins 2 loss 4th
Player 4  0 wins 3 loss 8th

Second Group
Player 5  2 wins 0 loss 3rd
Player 6  0 wins 1 loss
Player 7  0 wins 1 loss
Player 8  0 wins 0 loss

Third Group
Player 9  1 wins 0 loss 7th
Player 10 1 wins 1 loss 5th(2ppl)
Player 11 1 wins 1 loss 5th(2ppl)
Player 12 0 wins 1 loss

Fourth Group
Player 13 0 wins 0 loss
Player 14 0 wins 0 loss
Player 15 0 wins 0 loss
Player 16 0 wins 0 loss

(Which means ppl shouldn't expect even number of ppl to advance in each group.)

2nd Example:

First Group
Player 1  1 wins 0 loss 2nd
Player 2  0 wins 2 loss 3rd
Player 3  0 wins 0 loss
Player 4  0 wins 0 loss

Second Group
Player 5  2 wins 0 loss 1st
Player 6  0 wins 1 loss 4th (This player won once and lost twice in bo3 game.)
Player 7  0 wins 1 loss (This player does not have any win in bo3 game.)
Player 8  0 wins 0 loss

GJ Dennis

GJ Dmitri

Since Spaazi wanted to play only one game, I just played one game for kaos. (read the full chatbox)

Everything good and all, but isn't league suppose to have this rule? (check the first game chat) Meaning we have to play 1 or 2 more game with each other. I know I played only 1 game with Kosmos but I have to wait until he logs in at as he had to gtg last time.

4) Proceeding

   First, you need to find a partner. Then you decide which kind of league you want to play: Classic or Free. Both of you have to pick one scheme and play those two games.
   Before the first game start, both of you have to tell what your username on the site is. Missing to do this might have your games infirmed.
   After you finished the games, and the games result is 1-1, you can agree on playing a third game.
   EVERY GAME MUST BE REPORTED! This means DoN (Double or Nothing) games are highly forbidden!

(And btw, check the reply for Game #79683 complaint.)

Hello everyone. Our website is now open for public view! =) Check this link for more info.
https://www.tus-wa.com/forums/wosc/our-website/

Our website contains many of the unique schemes that we strive to make it fun and/or competitive. We hope our schemes are sucsessful and popular one day. Your support will help us to be more competent community. ^_^

Our Main Site
http://z13.invisionfree.com/WoSC/

Schemes
Under the forum Scheme Database, people can check our schemes and actually download them! Some schemes requires specific maps, so we actually have map inside the attached zip file as well. Replays are also in the attached file on most schemes to demostrate how game works. If there's a problem with the attached files, reply to us in this forum section. Many of the schemes will likely to be updated to further improve the scheme unless our scheme is at tus wa as well.

Forum Recruitment
Some people can join in this forum despite not being a member of this community in tus wa. It applies when member of tus is already in two communities. Also they can help our forum to be more active in productive as long as they post any useful and/or respectful comments.

kosmos accidently reported a 2 round game with just a single game I lose on. (check the game chat) Anyways he's a very nice guy, and he's new to this site I believe. Be soft on him for this mistake.
https://www.tus-wa.com/leagues/game-79683/

The scheme is updated at July 30, 2011 and uploaded to this site at July 31, 2011. Check the scheme explanation for more info on what's actually updated and changed.

WoSC have released a rubberworm version of one of the most popular scheme played in wormnet! It's called Triple Shopper and check these links for more details.
https://www.tus-wa.com/schemes/scheme-541/
https://www.tus-wa.com/forums/wosc/triple-shopper!!!/

Also we have hosted a tournament and cup for this scheme. Give it a try it as there's plenty of reason to play this scheme!
I have hosted scheme like this many times, and people have told me it's actually more fun than regular shopper! (SiD, Dennis, Foxhound, BittahCommander, and etc.) They also like the fact that there's lot more to do in every turn.
https://www.tus-wa.com/tournaments/tournament-255/
https://www.tus-wa.com/cups/cup-256/

I'm really confused why this contest is taking so long to get approved... There' only single tournament current going on right now.

It's really weird that you can only see this stat only by clicking information in the tournament, and this stat can't be seen by pressing user profile. It would be much nicer and meaningful for playing in the tournament if these issues are solved.

It think it actually looks better to have in-charge ppl to be in the list first. (Our general profile looks rather awkward due to only using alphabet to sort out the list. I kind of make us feel we're not the in-charge member of the clan even this is just a very minor issue.

WoSC are fairly open-minded scheme making community that also wants any constructive comments from any Tus members. As long they give respect and courtesy, we will be more than glad to communicate with you! If there's anything tus members want to post that is not within any of our posts, post it at "Non-Wosc Member Post Area". Our community is fairly new, and we strive to be better and better and better!

Any tus member can post in this one if they got anything to say whether it's a question, demand, compliment, or etc.