I'll f@#! Spaazi up in T17. Mwhauha
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Quote from: Dub-c on March 23, 2010, 02:31 PMQuote from: Free on March 23, 2010, 01:49 PM
In old days there were only few who could do ropers without mistakes and be very consistent about it - it was a big deal. Nowadays it's pretty common to play full roper without a single fall or big mistake.
And when it comes to HHC's opinion: I'm sure that top eliters in older days wouldn't be anything special nowadays, they would be easily beatable.
It's just my opinion naturally, but until someone actually proves me wrong, I'm gonna stick to my opinion.
I think you have miss-remembered.
Quote from: erdy` on March 23, 2010, 12:00 AM
Free and me just played and it ended in a 1:1. After that he had to go in order to sleep, i was okay with that and i hope you`re too, so that we can finish the game tomorrow, although the deadline already passed.
I tryed to report 1:1 with replays but that wasn`t possible; just to show that we realy played the first 2 rounds.
Quote from: Dub-c on March 23, 2010, 10:34 AM
I can only speak on roper. I'd consider myself a noob in elite. Ropers in general are nowhere close to the level people were on even 6 years ago. As long as the running league models is to play a bunch of schemes I don't think the gap will ever close. This game is at a different era now where you have to be good at all schemes and it takes away from the skill people can achieve on singular schemes.
So of course ropers "back in the day" are way more skilled then ropers now. Considering the dominant league game being played was roper, this should be common sense.
Quote from: Crazy on March 22, 2010, 09:15 PM
Probably of jealousy, as he owns everyone in elite