DarkXLord isn't able to reply on a simple PM.
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
#166
Cups and Tournaments Comments / Re: Cup #231: The Long Desired Intermediate Cup
July 04, 2011, 06:00 PM #167
Cups and Tournaments Comments / Re: Cup #231: The Long Desired Intermediate Cup
July 01, 2011, 10:19 PM
EDIT: Why I can't delete my own posts?
#168
Cups and Tournaments Comments / Re: Cup #231: The Long Desired Intermediate Cup
July 01, 2011, 10:13 PM
Hey, where I have to go to find this tourney page, if I don't want to follow the posted link in NNN forums? It's not listed at "current cups"
P.S. DarkXLord and Cinek, you got a PM!
P.S. DarkXLord and Cinek, you got a PM!
#169
Cups and Tournaments Comments / Re: Cup #231: The Long Desired Intermediate Cup
July 01, 2011, 09:33 AMQuote from: NAiL on July 01, 2011, 09:25 AM
You can still mix up the draw Jakka, speak to MI or a mod!
Nah! Objectivity ne1?! It doesn't matter if a pseudo pro meet a better player in 1/8 finals or in group stage.
#170
Cups and Tournaments Comments / Re: Cup #231: The Long Desired Intermediate Cup
July 01, 2011, 08:36 AMQuote from: zoky on July 01, 2011, 07:54 AM
gl all
but MI and adminsis there any way to avoid situation with 3 top player in same group,and 4 not so good?
Hmm, what group do you think of? IMO group 6 is the strongest.
#171
Cups and Tournaments Games Comments / Game #70371, Reported by Joschi
May 22, 2011, 07:43 PM
[Fantomas] have fun, you persistent f@#!er xD
Nice verbal disqualification. The ownage was for free.
Nice verbal disqualification. The ownage was for free.
#172
Cups and Tournaments Comments / Re: Tournament #205: Weekly Elite #08 Tournament
May 22, 2011, 06:32 PM
Please check the scheme of the replay
#173
Leagues Games Comments / Game #70183, Reported by Joschi
May 21, 2011, 02:27 PM
Hihi :-) Good games.
#174
Leagues Complaints / Re: What happens if rope knock in elite?
May 21, 2011, 09:07 AM
I didn't want to generalize, SPW ;-) I know a bunch of very friendly TEL players. But I just meet a player, who quitted the round after the very first turn, because of a silly mistake. That shows me, that there are some people, who only enjoy the game, when they are successful.
Spaazi, well, I feel affronted, because you started a discussion in my back, though I was a part of this discussion. As franz saied, your worm was dead anyway, with or without knock, so I toke it as a very last try from you to change the outcome of the round.
Hf there.
Spaazi, well, I feel affronted, because you started a discussion in my back, though I was a part of this discussion. As franz saied, your worm was dead anyway, with or without knock, so I toke it as a very last try from you to change the outcome of the round.
Hf there.
#175
Leagues Complaints / Re: What happens if rope knock in elite?
May 20, 2011, 08:11 PM
Rofl, what the heck is going on here? Why you just don't ask me to void the round? I saied sorry and since you didn't reply, I could estimate that the case is closed ... I give a shit on the round.
Meh, how annoying!! Leaving the round without saying good-bye, just to open a complain thread in my back. It's not long that I started to play TEL and I already toke more then one negative moment out of this.
I wonder anyway what the knock changed here? Your worm was dead, with or without knock.
P.S. I thought I play against an honorable player. But Spaazi doesn't realize that I was just better this round. So give him the win please, I don't need to discuss this. And sorry for my knock, I just forgot about it.
Meh, how annoying!! Leaving the round without saying good-bye, just to open a complain thread in my back. It's not long that I started to play TEL and I already toke more then one negative moment out of this.
I wonder anyway what the knock changed here? Your worm was dead, with or without knock.
P.S. I thought I play against an honorable player. But Spaazi doesn't realize that I was just better this round. So give him the win please, I don't need to discuss this. And sorry for my knock, I just forgot about it.
#176
Cups and Tournaments Comments / Re: Tournament #143: Intermediate
March 26, 2011, 10:06 AMQuote from: DarKxXxLorD on March 24, 2011, 05:52 PM
Good rules
Copy+Paste of NNN-One-Evening Tournaments

Tomorrow, 16 GMT, 41st Intermediate Tourney hosted by NNN clan. Check it out
#177
General discussion / Re: Crespo's Worms Tournament 2010
February 01, 2011, 11:17 PM
Weee, 1 trophy is still on the way to his owner Dario. So far we got 2 winner pics of Mablak and Kayz 
Both with their trophies in their hands

Both with their trophies in their hands


#178
Leagues Games Comments / Game #50472, Reported by Kayz
January 04, 2011, 06:45 PM
[dC`Chelsea] bad scheme
[dC`Chelsea] and map
Bad loser ne1? xD
[dC`Chelsea] and map
Bad loser ne1? xD
#179
TUS Discussion / Re: NNN merging with TUS
December 31, 2010, 02:37 PM
Sorry, but your huge humbleness should forbid you to claim about my low level of discussion.
I don't want to win anyone's credits, I just clearify our clans position. The actuall discussion about the topic also don't run here in this thread. That's the reason why I only corrected - from my point of view - your exxagerations/things which could be misinterpreted from the community.
I don't have to take your line of "Humbleness, prouds, rivalries", I can also contradict your statistic of hosted games since 2003-today, meaning - from your point of view - that TUS let raised the number of hosted games. What about the fact, that more and more WWP players settled over to W:A, due to T17 refusal in year 2003(?) to release and devellope updates. I toke the change about 2007, most wormers I know changed 2006. Since then I only play W:A. But I don't know the birth of TUS, but I guess TUS grow up due to the new strenght and high amount of W:A players. But I doubt the validity of your argument, that the "system TUS" increased the games. Moreover the inverse is real.
My point is, that I think only the diversity safe our reached standing. You just can't deny that not everybody has to like TUS, not everybody has to like Facebook and so on...
I nowhere doubt your estimations. I just tried to show you, (1) that humbleness is a too strong verbalism for our case (actual it's only a game community and most of us don't know each other personal; in fact we spend some of our spare time here, instead of dying in borness
) (2) the synonym 'proud' is nothing negative.
Your way to talk in general is also dangerous, since you only give us 'hints', but never facts. So your posts might explode of generalities, but don't help us really. I prefere another way, also with the risk to touch someone. Sorry that I toke you, but it seemed that you are the loudest speaker in this thread and at the same time, since you are an ex-NNN member, also enjoy some public confidence for everything what is related with NNN. I might say sorry for my side-kicks of my previous post, but your recent comment in NNN shoutbox let me emote a bit.
The fact that I am against a merge doesn't mean that I don't admire MonkeyIslands's work and the fantastic develloppment of the whole system. It's a overwhelm running project and W:A without TUS isn't imageable anymore. But a continuation of the discussion wouldn't bring more benefits. The things are clearly setted. So long the OnL is still accepted of their members and the hoster, NNN clan, is standing unique behind the project, there is no reason to convince anyone.
That's from my part, I wish everybody a Happy New Year.
I don't want to win anyone's credits, I just clearify our clans position. The actuall discussion about the topic also don't run here in this thread. That's the reason why I only corrected - from my point of view - your exxagerations/things which could be misinterpreted from the community.
I don't have to take your line of "Humbleness, prouds, rivalries", I can also contradict your statistic of hosted games since 2003-today, meaning - from your point of view - that TUS let raised the number of hosted games. What about the fact, that more and more WWP players settled over to W:A, due to T17 refusal in year 2003(?) to release and devellope updates. I toke the change about 2007, most wormers I know changed 2006. Since then I only play W:A. But I don't know the birth of TUS, but I guess TUS grow up due to the new strenght and high amount of W:A players. But I doubt the validity of your argument, that the "system TUS" increased the games. Moreover the inverse is real.
My point is, that I think only the diversity safe our reached standing. You just can't deny that not everybody has to like TUS, not everybody has to like Facebook and so on...
Quote from: Ivo on December 30, 2010, 12:40 PM
... believe me, the things that was told me in the discussions that I had, totally justify those words! I just don't want to say more about it, to not follow your style. That's why I spoke in a general way.
I nowhere doubt your estimations. I just tried to show you, (1) that humbleness is a too strong verbalism for our case (actual it's only a game community and most of us don't know each other personal; in fact we spend some of our spare time here, instead of dying in borness

Your way to talk in general is also dangerous, since you only give us 'hints', but never facts. So your posts might explode of generalities, but don't help us really. I prefere another way, also with the risk to touch someone. Sorry that I toke you, but it seemed that you are the loudest speaker in this thread and at the same time, since you are an ex-NNN member, also enjoy some public confidence for everything what is related with NNN. I might say sorry for my side-kicks of my previous post, but your recent comment in NNN shoutbox let me emote a bit.
The fact that I am against a merge doesn't mean that I don't admire MonkeyIslands's work and the fantastic develloppment of the whole system. It's a overwhelm running project and W:A without TUS isn't imageable anymore. But a continuation of the discussion wouldn't bring more benefits. The things are clearly setted. So long the OnL is still accepted of their members and the hoster, NNN clan, is standing unique behind the project, there is no reason to convince anyone.
That's from my part, I wish everybody a Happy New Year.
#180
TUS Discussion / Re: NNN merging with TUS
December 30, 2010, 11:12 AMQuote from: Ivo on December 30, 2010, 02:11 AMYou're welcome, I hope I didn't disappointed you.
I was wondering when you would do this post, with a personal attack against me. But I knew that would be at your first in this discussion.
So you talked to the NNN members of your wish (can you remember at my reproach, that you split the clan in worth, no-worth members?

It's really gay to speak for our clan, since 1) Kilo asked for TUS guys opinion 2) You aren't a member of our clan, moreover, as you saied on your own, you couldn't identify yourself with the clan. But for outstanding people it seems like you could be an insider, that's why I think you only utilize this to gain persuasiveness for your posts. And that is the only reason why I posted here.
Maybe it's a silly question from me, but did you guys already discussed a merge of a2b and TUS?