Please include the draws?

Quote from: Lancelot on August 11, 2024, 07:15 PMconfirmed

gl

p.s - this is one of my least favorite schemes, so unfortunately I will not be participating here. sry

Consider this for future Wheel of Fortune cups.

Saving the brazilian economy ae

Quote from: FoxHound on August 09, 2024, 12:47 AMAnother possibility for BnG could be the type of SD that ends the game.

After 20 minutes, SD will end the game and the player with more HP wins. If both have the same HP, it would be rare, but it could receive a form to decide the winner. Or consider a draw. Or just count an equal number of turns for both players.

This would limit the game by time.

This is definitely a good solution for long matches. As much as I believe we're just problematizing something unnecessary at the moment, I'd like to see something like this implemented. This shouldn't be a problem or a concern for good players anyway.

Now the hard part, we just need to agree on when a match becomes long. How many minutes? 1 hour? 1 hour and a half?

nice 3v3 series

This game we shopped more SD weapons than anything else.. 7 aquas.. ?

Streaming games is optional or mandatory?

Nah man at this point I just assumed you're being arrogant or trolling/baiting, there's no way that a "healthy grown up adult" can be that ignorant about currency.

The currency is not the same, the minimum wage in Brazil is low and I make below the minimum like millions of other brazilians. I just made a quick search and the cheapest decent full hd monitor costs around 65-70% of the mininum wage salary.
Here in Brazil we have the culture of spliting the purchase in credit card as much as we can.. endless debts to survive.

I know that you have no obligation to know my financial situation or that of my country, but before you continue to insist on measuring the reality of the world with your own metric, I warned you that we didn't share the same reality.
Anyway, I'm done with this subject.

QuoteAnyway, aside the whole buying/not buying better monitor thing - it's like I make a post about banning Inter scheme because some people will surely have advantage playing it on 1024x768, while I'm using 1920x1080. Wouldn't you find that laughable?

Yes I would.
But this argument doesn't make any sense because you can switch back to any lower resolution at any time, unlike someone with a smaller monitor who can't use a higher resolution. It's not as if you're being hardware forced to use your monitor's native resolution, you are just choosing to do it...

My point is, this scheme is the only one in the entire classic league that benefits someone solely because they have a better hardware, but not only that, it happens because by default the maps used go beyond the native map size initially established by the game (1920x696), we are going against the main patterns of the game and rules that is fundamental to other all round schemes, big rr/tower is just unnatural to be placed there, all other schemes you can demand default map size by rule.

Btw I think this is the longest post I have ever written here

The whole idea of necessity to change the resolution just to fit a SINGLE scheme is just ridiculous. We're basically benefiting the exception and not the rule. Sorry for double post and not quoting.

Yeah man, you are god damn right, ofcourse everyone shares the same reality and conditions.
I really hope you are trolling or using exagerated hyperbole there..
But If you are serious I bet you had a boner indirectly calling others poor saying that you make enough money to equate such a purchase with buying 2 beers, rofl.

Anyway, I was mostly venting when I proposed to remove it, it's not an issue right now, the amount of times it's picked can be considered negligible so I couldn't care less.
Let's focus on the banning ideas.

Quote from: TheKomodo on July 27, 2024, 05:58 PM

Quote from: style on July 27, 2024, 04:34 PMThough luck, why?

Well - if I look onto a case where 2 similar ropers play big rr and the one is having a bigger screen, which defo makes it easier to play, is brutal unfair. Despite the popularity we should not forget that it's the PO where games shouldn't be decided by such aspects.

So we're allowed to buy better PC's, better keyboards, better mice, but we're not allowed to buy bigger screens for some reason?

My monitor is only 27" and I can play Big RR just fine.

The truth, from my perspective, is that it's a scheme you simply either don't enjoy, or cannot be bothered spending the time to get good at. Just the same as I don't want to ever play Intermediate or Team17, I'd just give out free wins because life is too short to do things you don't enjoy.

Contradicting what you said, I love big rr but not this from the current league, I like the LDET version.. I made several maps, but I recognize that I can't play at the same level as other players because I don't have/won't buy a bigger monitor just to play rr lol.

There's no reason to make things difficult, big rr is the only scheme that is an exception to the rule, all the other schemes in the league use the native size and are backed by the rule to demand a standard size map if the opponent chooses a large map.

Also I could say the same thing using your perspective but with the reverse argument:
How can someone force themselves to get good/enjoy something if the person is already starting at a disadvantage? There's no point in bothering, I can relate.

Hopefully we get to remove this scheme from league already or at least get to ban schemes, it's something.

Please report the draw replay too. Camper played but had to go I replaced him.

I agree 100%. In addition, I'm against Big RR in the league because this scheme benefits those who have better hardware, a larger monitor that makes it possible to see the path of the map with a visual advantage, while the other maps you can see with most monitors. In fact, it even becomes a visual disadvantage to use a higher resolution in these schemes.

I can't use higher resolutions (1080p and higher), and if I force it, it breaks the game screen.

Hahaha, this is the best map ever made

Thanks for the updates. What's the link adress again to translate TUS?