wow nt homing at end crash, bl

sure you can crazy, you havent reached the 50 game minimum yet.

You'd PO in 3rd with your current rating if you had.

Quote from: benz on November 27, 2009, 02:27 PM
Be online and dont leave ur stupid snoopers online, hate those dead snoopers on, why do u have it on then?

agreed

Now another post for another idea.

As random said, it is difficult for players with high overal rankings to "win" a season. now. They can come second easily enough, but comming first will be very difficult and require a very large number of games to be played.

Why not have PO positions like this.

1 Random (Highest Overal Rating)
1 NAiL       (Highest  Seasonal Rating)
2 benz      (2nd Highest Overal Rating)
2 Luke      (2nd Highest  Seasonal Rating)
3
3
4
4

i.e. Joint places!


Then have 1v4, 1v4, 2v3, 2v3 etc for the knockouts.

I understand your point Random. It was a bad thing to allow ranks to be reset, that completely and utterly destroys the purpose of keeping long term rankings. People need to play for at least 2 seasons for their true skill level to is reflected in their ratings.  This makes it easier for newcomers to the league to gain lots of points, but the next season it'll be much more balanced.

Now I think its been changed so that you can only reset if your under 1000, which is fine.


MI the current system does not display PO positions as they should be. It makes sense to consider ones overal rating BEFORE their seasonal rating.

Look at the standings now, I have a higher overal rating, and a higher seasonal rating than Ray, but he qualifies in 2nd and I qualify in 5th.

I realise that this is because the system is considering seasonal ratings before overal ratings., but this is silly because once other players in the top 20 reach the minimum game limit (benz and random for example), I willl be knocked down the seasonal rankings until the system considers my overal rating.

So in effect I will drop down in the seasonal standings, but keep my overal rating and so qualify HIGHER than if I had played more games for the season.

I understand how PO qualification currently works, but the way in which it is displayed is misleading until the end of the season.

My main point is, the system MUST consider overall ratings BEFORE seasonal ratings.

Undestand what I mean now?

but MI, I have higher ratings than phantom and hes second.

Im the highest overal with 50 games played, surely I should be 2nd. It doesnt make sense that phantom is higher than me, and that if I loose enough points, I willl qualify higher!

Pleas explain this, also pls remind me how the PO qualifications work.

Quote from: Dub-c on November 26, 2009, 05:47 AM
Ahwell, I guess I'm the only one who thinks its stupid to stop a scheme after 10 mins of playing.

no, havent you read the posts in this thread...?

Monkey I have a higher seasonal and overal rating than some players there, and qualify below them. This must be a bug, pls explain!

Quote from: Dub-c on November 25, 2009, 10:20 PM

Quote from: NAiL on November 25, 2009, 07:25 PM
Just because something remains unchanged over time doesnt mean that it cannot be improved or should not be changed.

I think an ENFORCED wxw rule in roper would make things better.

This would mean consistant roping would be requred every turn, and no falling and running back to the hide would take place.

Thats not a roper. Roper is get crate and attack.

yes, im talking about SD though... you dont seem to follow this basic thing

lol nice

zippo is a cyber bully xD

Yes please exaplin.

I think there should be a dedicated PO button on the standings page that lists all of the players qualifying for PO positions, that also explains why they positioned as they did.


e.g. You press it and get this:

Playoff Positions

1st :  Phantom  (Highest Seasonal Rating)
2nd:  yanme     (Highest Overall Rating)
3rd : NAiL         (2nd Highest Sesonal Rating)
4th:  Phil          (2nd Highest Overall Rating)
""   ""    ""

etc...

So you dont have to scroll through pages to find the players and also avoids any confusion.

Just because something remains unchanged over time doesnt mean that it cannot be improved or should not be changed.

I think an ENFORCED wxw rule (during SD)  in roper would make things better.

This would mean consistant roping would be requred every turn, and no falling and running back to the hide would take place.

ali_c_1233@hotmail.com

email me because I dont have msn on this comp

add dark to the group with 3 players PR!

Dno why you wouldnt wait for just 1 more player before starting it lol