English
Home | Forums | Groups | Leagues | Cups | Tournaments | Challenges | Maps | Schemes | Files | Calendar | Donate
Menu

Show posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Show posts Menu

Messages - NAiL

#1186
lol last crate before draw, check the ending!
#1187
carlumbo never plays lol, saw diego and tried to play games only once but connection wasnt working.
#1188
bOr / Re: rejoin bor
December 09, 2009, 04:33 AM
easily pleased 8 )
#1189
TUS Discussion / Re: Limited girders in T17
December 08, 2009, 11:11 PM
Well if anything surely this makes for a more exciting game.

My point is, even if your getting better weps in general, then so is your opponant.

This doesnt mean each turn will be attack attack attack, you'll still play with defence in regard the same you would had you picked up worser weps.
#1190
bOr / Re: rejoin bor
December 08, 2009, 11:06 PM
Quote from: Crazy on December 08, 2009, 05:04 PM
You are using gay as a synonym for negative adjectives, for example lame, stupid and so on. It is disrespectful for homosexual people, and I feel sorry for you if you dont`t get this. I know you don`t mean anything when writing that, like 95% of everyone else, and I don`t take any offence by it, but in general and over time, it is damaging. Using gay in a derogatory manner is insulting, period  :o

Im probably the least homphobic person you'd meet, I dont hold prejudices against people for being the only thing that they can ever be.

I use this word ALL the time, our generation has grown up with it, our generation has cultivated it.

I'd never use it in a formal environment, and my gay friends (yes everyone says they have gay friends don't they) take NO offense from it whatsoever, they even use the word in a derogatory manner themselves.

Sorry for being a smart ass, I think the Norwiegans are not yet as acustomed to the alternative uses of this word as we are in the UK. We're much more lax about the whole "gay" word over here, be you hetrosexual, homosexual or animal f@#!er.

But I hear you, I won't say it any more 8 )
#1191
bOr / Re: rejoin bor
December 08, 2009, 03:31 PM
well crazy knows I love him, and I won't use that word like that EVER again in worms forums, just for you.

I'll say lame instead, but then I might offend my crippled grandpa whos legs are completely lame, if he happens to browse the wormy forums.
#1192
TUS Discussion / Re: Limited girders in T17
December 08, 2009, 03:24 PM
Quote from: Chicken23 on December 08, 2009, 08:40 AM

the current tus scheme it sooooooooo unbalanced. its just hhg, flamie, minigun, longbow, old woman, sheep launcher............

there isnt enough shit weapons. These change the tactics of a game.. at the moment its just pure aggression. ATTACK, ATTACK, ATTACK..

players who remember the alternative schemes to tus agree with me here.

I played the AL, FB, XTS and TUS schemes.

Honestly I cant remember what the differences where like, although im almost certain crate chances weren't that much different.

What do you mean by shit weps? Handgun, uzi, grenades, clusters etc?

I get these weps along with better ones in almost every T17 I play.

Your a good T17er, you know that even if you get a "good" wep, its only useful to you in the right circumstances. You dont usually use a granny as soon as you get one, or any other "good" wep for that matter. You use your weps when an opportunity arises, when you can get the most bang for your buck.

If both players have the same chances of getting the same weapons then there isn't a problem.

I dont think you've played enough T17's with the TUS scheme to come to that decision. Its also a very subjective opinion as for every game you could show me (uisng the TUS scheme) thats "all aggression" as you say, I could find you a replay where ive had "shit" weps and have had to play extra defensive.

It all comes down to luck on the day, and as you know getting "good" weps does not automatically secure a win, or lead to attacking every turn. Thats what the girders are for, thats why we darkside worms and wait for good opportunities to attack.
#1193
TUS Discussion / Re: Limited girders in T17
December 08, 2009, 04:44 AM
Quote from: chakkman on November 24, 2009, 01:37 PM
Quote from: NAiL on November 24, 2009, 12:25 AM
I find that the only argument for limited girders in T17 is "stop blocking me".

You named the most relevant argument for limited girders right there. Theoretically you could simply draw a game by blocking your opponent in every single turn.

SG ne1? Aqua ne1? Homing ne1? SW ne1? Moving far away enough to prevent block ne1? Magic bullet ne1?

Counteracting TACTICS, with TACTICS is the name of the game when it comes to turn based strategy.

How many games have been won when girders are unlimited, an uncountable number.

If your argument was true, no T17 games would ever be won.

About the weps in the current tus scheme, I like em. Balanced.
#1194
bOr / Re: rejoin bor
December 08, 2009, 04:26 AM
Wikipedia:

"The term gay was originally used, until well into the mid-20th century, primarily to refer to feelings of being "carefree", "happy", or "bright and showy"; it had also come to acquire some connotations of "immorality" as early as 1637.

The term later began to be used in reference to homosexuality, in particular, from the early 20th century, a usage that may have dated prior to the 19th century. In modern English, gay has come to be used as an adjective, and occasionally as a noun, that refers to the people, practices, and culture associated with homosexuality."

So Crazy, by using the word gay to describe homsexuality, YOU are actually taking the word out of its original context, and so contradict yourself by saying things like that.

That goes for the rest of you who say "ooo dont use gay as a negative word wawawa", food for thought.
#1195
bOr / Re: rejoin bor
December 08, 2009, 04:16 AM
Quote from: Crazy on December 08, 2009, 03:17 AM
It`s also kind of gay to use gay in a negative way like that Nail :-\

Its also kind of gay to say things like that.

Words evolve, take on new meanings, are used within different contexts.

Gay originally meant quaint, happy, joyfull. It was then used to describe homosexuals due to the common stereotype happening to fit its orginal meaning.

I dont describe something as "gay" meaning that it is homosexual, I use its alternative meaning to describe something as being lame, inappropriate or unamusing.

This happens with many words, take "black" for example.

How many times have you heard this word be used to describe something negative? "It was a black day", "The black death killed millions", "His heart was corrupt, blackened after being subjected to years of pain and anguish".

You dont get every black man in the world complaining about other uses of the word black, so what makes this any different for the gays?

Words become SYNONYMOUS over time you know?
#1196
bOr / Re: rejoin bor
December 08, 2009, 12:57 AM
Why doesnt the boy post here...?

I mean I knew that that post was a load of ass licking ramble but he could show just a tiny bit more intrest in joining the clan.
#1197
Maps / Re: THeDoGG random ropers pack
December 05, 2009, 06:21 PM
great maps gj
#1198
bOr / Re: rejoin bor
December 05, 2009, 06:11 PM
I like you dibz, but leaving without even a goodbye is kinda gay, even though I know your a clan hopper!

But yeh welcome back, cant really refuse you.
#1199
wow shot at 1.08 on the 3rd replay!
#1200
bOr / Re: gg
December 04, 2009, 10:28 PM
gg, dont bother calling.