This one used to be my long time favourite, also the second english song which lyrics I've learned.



Edit: just read the first post here... But ok, this game failed already.

Quote from: ShyGuy on October 29, 2010, 05:14 AM
hopefully you won't let me know, cos i am hoping you kill yourself after it happens

Do you know you are discussing (or debating, or arguing) about a game?

Gj Ray, good to see you play bng again!

I wanted to play, but fell asleep at 14:00 GMT, lol

surgeon killed the cat!?

"No repeat shots."

By the a2b rule, or somehow else?

Quote from: ShyGuy on October 28, 2010, 11:12 AM
Komo, I get the impression you think people use ss in elite and it is some tight squeeze ssr adventure through the map... that is hardly ever the case, although there are cool replays of that.

I was thinking about this, but didn't want to say before, 'cause i found it stupid. But now you came up with it... So if you think this way, then what's the point of playing RopeRace? You hardly ever need to use that style of roping in any other "popular" scheme.

Do we talk here about being all-rounder, or about being good in popular schemes?

Btw don't you think that being / not being part of classic league quite determines the popularity of a scheme? I think a lot of players play Roper, Shopper, WxW, Elite, TTRR, T17 and BnG because they have to know them to earn points in classic league.

Quote from: chakkman on October 25, 2010, 10:51 PM
Actually that has also already been discussed quite a few times. If i remember right MonkeyIsland's point was that it would reduce the activity of each league. Totally agree with that. Really, the point is not to deny any new ideas, it is just that i wonder if people are unhappy with the league as it is now, or if they are into something "new and sexy" (more likely) which becomes boring again when it has grown old. Better to check yourself first before shouting for breaking changes in this league.

That point is right, a new league like this would reduce activity in other leagues, especially classic. But just two more things: 1. I don't care about something is getting boring. There will be new players every time, who will find it "new and sexy". I'm not bored about classic league; never liked it. 2. "shouting for breaking changes"? I came up with an idea, and You came here shouting me down.

Please don't think I am forcing something or i can't take criticism. Make your point, explain it, and see, it's all okay.

avirex! I'm laughin

Komo, how do you exactly imagine the all-round standings? Every schemes which someone plays as for a TUS league count? Shouldn't there only be specific schemes which count? I think I understand how do You mean, but not sure how would that give an objective picture of how "all-rounder" a player is. If we specify some schemes which must be played for the all-rounder standings, it will act like a new league. If we don't, then who will tell if I am all-rounder "enough"?

Meh. What's this all against SSR?
Chakkman, you totally got me wrong. I don't care about those 1 scheme leagues, that's only an idea, if anyone misses something...

I'm just trying to make my point of this thread.
I didn't know you discussed these things already.

Quote from: chakkman on October 25, 2010, 07:44 PM
Are people unsatisfied with the way this league is going? You know, i think the selection of schemes in the classic league is great, those schemes are popular, most people try to be good at them, the perfect league schemes, and now you want schemes like SSR to be in the classic league, ugh...

I think most people who satisfied now, would be satisfied with my ideas too. And yes, many people complaining about the schemes in classic league (hyst, t17, shopper, roper...).
Perfect league schemes? Because they are popular?
Btw, I never said i want SSR in classic league.

Let's not talk about classic league, but all-round league as Komo said. And let's talk about this as an idea of a new league. Can we do it now without people saying "revolutionary nonsense", and "thats just lol" without explaining?

This way You can concentrate on small changes in classic league, and who is interested, can talk about the all-round skill league.

Quote from: TitiO on October 25, 2010, 12:26 PM
Prankster, u mean make 1 league for each scheme ? and the points gained/losted dont interfer at the overhall of the all schemes (classic league) ?

i agree to make 1 league to each scheme.

and can be add tower to the classic league, cuz it the other that is 0% of luck.

Yes I mean something like that, but that's not a must. Btw it's not my idea, a2b is done already. We only have our forums on TUS.
And there is TNL too, but it's open while a2b is private.

I meant tower OR roperace. But in some way they are the same.

Quote from: DeathInFire on October 25, 2010, 06:06 PM
If it comes down to skill only schemes, Super Sheep Race would be a very good candidate. There is no luck involved in that scheme. It's just not popular. I like the idea of just 1 scheme of one of a kind as well. 1 pure roping scheme, 1 artillery etc. +1

Edit: It would even be possible to do time trial super sheep race, would be fun too.

Adding SSR to classic league is a good idea for example! Driving the sheep is quite a basic skill, imo. Hm, I didn't really thought about skills only schemes or not, but i think it's doable. But then there wouldn't be roper or any shopper in classic league, and that idea would face too big resistance... Or maybe roper without crates, but a spot to touch before attack..?

Husk. I didn't know that, but of course. Or maybe even better if we say that TNL (or later TEL) is a good example for one scheme leagues, what I talked about (which clearly is in my sight!). Then it wouldn't mean any problem to pick intermediate or elite in free league (as we choose the other one to be the classic league scheme). Or if we choose a 3rd (what I doubt), both could be picked in free league...

I express myself a bit complicated in english, but hope You understand what I'm trying to say.

Quote from: Komo on October 25, 2010, 11:00 AM
Honestly, I think BungeeRace, Forts & Super Sheep Race should be added to the all-round league:

Calling it all-round league instead of classic league is a good point! Good idea about those schemes to be added, too, but I don't think forts will be in the all-round league while there will be intermediate or elite... They're just not too much different, like shopper and wxw.

Ps.: Now I'm getting applaudes (thx for them! ), but I can foresee a war about which skills are basic and which are the best schemes about them...

This topic became a topic about ppl dont like hysteria or t17... lets ban every scheme from classic league, except ttrr, because thats the only one with 0% luck! (heh jk, i hate ttrr )

anyway some limitations in hyst weapons would be nice...

and about free league. i dont think there should be any limitations about what scheme u can pick. (except classic league schemes and intermediate).

but again, in some way this whole classic league schemes and free league schemes is wrong.

imho classic league should be something like:
1 scheme for pure roping (ttrr or tower or something)
1 for attacking and tactics from rope (roper, some shoppa...)
1 for artillery skills (bng, burning girders...)
1 for tactics and knowing weapons (elite, int maybe?...)
...
1 for every skill which we can agree as a basic skill in worms.

so what i mean is there should be one scheme in classic league for every basic skills, the best one about the actual skill, but not more.

every other schemes in free league.

and anyone can run a specific league along with tus, or independent. like a2b.

that video is just amazing! and when galaxies looks like the stars on the sky... and the whole thing is infinite... woah, thats crazy! and even here on the earth our mind is limitated to understand and think in 4 dimensions...

Quote from: THeDoGG on October 23, 2010, 12:52 PM

Quote from: Prankster on October 23, 2010, 12:16 PM

Quote from: THeDoGG on October 22, 2010, 05:23 PM
Nice pics Prankster
What camera do you use ?

I have a Canon 30D with a 50 mm f 1/1.8 II, and soon I'm going to buy a 28-135 f 1/3.5-5.6 IS USM. Sometimes I borrow lens or tripod from friends... Building my own slowly
Do you take photos too, Dogg?

Well, I am still noob I've bought a basic camera, the canon eos 1000d whith classical objective too :p I'm still learning!! and if i'm liking it maybe i'm going to buy some better material

If you will like it, buy a 30D 40D or 50D. You can get those at a good price (used), with only a few thousand shots either. 30D is a very good camera, I only have some problems because once I dropped it...

Quote from: THeDoGG on October 22, 2010, 05:23 PM
Nice pics Prankster
What camera do you use ?

I have a Canon 30D with a 50 mm f 1/1.8 II, and soon I'm going to buy a 28-135 f 1/3.5-5.6 IS USM. Sometimes I borrow lens or tripod from friends... Building my own slowly
Do you take photos too, Dogg?

Quote from: CMV on October 23, 2010, 11:44 AM
There is a hysteria community (lead by my humble self) already, why make another one? =o

challenge?

thx Ramo! noone said im not a photographer, i just saying im not a professional (i mean i never learned).

haha Komo, very nice!
btw avi. if u dont tell them u have a dancemat before they come up to u, they will like it when they see it. i bet