We're gonna change the wording of the quoted bit of rules for TUS2.

Wish you swift recovery, Ray

TUS needs a paint/photoshop thread, btw.

Quote from: AsbestMisha on February 18, 2012, 07:31 PM
Husk,try to speak en english. I don't understand, what r u talking about... I left,coz when game started,I thought,water rise was right,then I saw,that water rise fail again, I told "omg,lets again rh". Coz we were failing with this water rise many times...But TdC just ignored this moment.

There was no "water rise fail". There was simply land below that mine which you thought it should sink. I find it funny you demanded english from Husk.

The water level is fine.

How do you explain the poster to the chicks you invite to your place? 

Welcome. Good luck climbing, we ain't gonna make it easy for you 

Quote from: wormf00d on February 11, 2012, 03:58 AM
You can all suck my lovely cock! Zero respect to all of you who think you f@#!in invented worms or something, f@#! you too.  I only read 1 page out of the ongoing 6 pages and you can all suck it. Bng needs rules or it's not bng, did msdos sorched earth have any problems? No! I can't care less what you wanna call your weirdo schemes just don't call it bng!

/drunk out!

Don't mess with this guy!  

Touché, hehe.

Deleted. Re-report, quickly 

I will later, have to go now.

Quote from: Komito on February 07, 2012, 12:33 PM

Quote from: Rok on February 07, 2012, 12:25 PM
I call bullshit.

Good for you.

Feel free to ignore the first sentence of mine if it bothers you and concentrate on the rest, it might be good for you.  I don't pretend I know what's good for you, though.  

Quote from: ShyGuy on February 07, 2012, 12:58 PM
how could you possibly know this for a fact? the turn of that fall my crate was impossible, how do you know, even if I didn't fall, that a fair crate would drop next time?

I don't understand the mindset of people who defend this scheme... ps made 3 obvious mistakes which gave us a solid lead, then the game engine gave the game back slowly

Fair point, can't say for sure the next crate was gonna be easy, but my point is you didn't even give yourself a chance to see, you fell (after you already got that crate) and got killed next turn, while you could've just hid on top and waited. 90% or so that the crate was going to be easy enough, and you would've won, you can't deny that, right?

IIRC, you had 3 ridiculously easy crates while ps had just 2. You also did 3 mistakes, it's not like only ps did mistakes and only your hard crates enabled them to get back in the game.

I didn't defend the scheme itself (I might have, in some other discussion), I'm merely saying you're overreacting and blaming crates while that's not the main reason you lost.

Quote from: ShyGuy on February 07, 2012, 12:58 PM
"the game WILL f@#! you up at times for no reason, but the playerz who can keep their kool after an unfair crate will win in the end!"

Yeah, that's how f.e. poker basically works. Still it's considered a game of skill, isn't it?

Quote from: Komito on February 07, 2012, 07:49 AM

Quote from: ShyGuy on January 28, 2012, 09:53 PM
if you guys cannot see how crates allowed them to get back in the game, then there is nothing more i can say to change your minds. you are all brainwashed

I 2nd that

I call bullshit. Watch the game carefully. mm lost because of their own mistakes. Devilage's fall from the right side of the roof made the comeback possible and they'd still have won if shyguy didn't fall in hist last turn.

Is it possible I've seen this table on 2+2?

Nice!

Done.

Unlucky last teleport for Husk