Check the opening post of the topic...

You pick one scheme, I pick one scheme.

Simple - as it always been.

Wally, most of my opponents pick RR (seriously) to take a punt at points.

What can I do?

Komo, your post reads like a Subway advert (play it YOUR way)

In that case, I will play Allround league with no 5h0pper or hysteria. That's right, none of you can pick shoppr or hysteria against me.

I raise my chance of reaching playoffs and get to focus on reaching #1 in rr at the same time.

Let me play it my way, don't be selfish.

Haha Fada your example is terrible.

By playing an allround classic league you sign up to the chance of playing any allround classic scheme.

Lex is right - ironically there are many other leagues to play if you want to avoid refuse specific schemes.

Fair enough - I've not experienced it first hand.

However, no one needs to justify why it is complete bullshit - similar to avoiding.

Take the ass-kicking and improve.

Scheme avoiding is why I don't play singles - complete bullshit.

Learn to play other schemes.

And Kamouchi aka DiD was gand's sidekick

That looks good, ANO but it is about the same price as the Steelseries 6gv2

Will get it done before the 10th!

No need to justify yourself, was highlighting a clear flaw with the avoiding logic.

This avoiding thing is could open a can of worms *ahem*

What if someone asks for TUS in the channel and you ask someone else via PM?

You picked/targeted your opponent instead of taking the open offer - sneaky avoiding.
The person who asked won't know though.

Asking for league games could be half of the battle...

Haha.

I gues the difference is that roper can be heavily luck based

Quote from: Senator on May 29, 2016, 04:05 PM

Quote from: darKz on May 29, 2016, 03:15 PM

Quote from: Ryan on May 29, 2016, 02:36 PM
I don't understand why it is lame to not hide if I gain a lead.
Why should I allow the opponent the chance to beat me if the aim is to win?

It's not lame. People just make up excuses when they lose and try to shift the blame on the scheme or the rules, that's all.

It depends how u gained the lead. Let's say u get 2 easy crates while the opponent gets 2 very hard/impossible crates. Then u hide at mid/top to make your further crates easy for u. In other words u don't let crate luck balance and u win by luck.

I understand what you are saying, but if you are leading, you want to take luck out of the scheme, hiding well will get you in trouble if the crates get hard.
I don't want to be thinking about how I got a lead. I am winning and that is all that matters - my best chance to win is to take luck out of the scheme, so I "hide" up top to minimise the chance of crate rape hurting me.

It is like taking a lot of crates in T17 then leaving one for your opponent because they had bad luck with placement.

You wouldn't do it.

I realise this is getting off topic fast, and I appreciate that you are trying to take luck out of the scheme.
Crates will always create an element of luck which we just have to deal with...

I don't understand why it is lame to not hide if I gain a lead.
Why should I allow the opponent the chance to beat me if the aim is to win?

Also, 4 star bazooka alone gives player 1 a bigger advantage especially when they get a successful attack first turn.