I'm dragging it on because it is still relevant... you have an opinion on schemes, I am ignoring your reasoning, you are getting upset. That is exactly what happened before, except we played different roles. You used the same arguments I am using against you... and you getting upset about that just proves in an indirect sort of way that you acknowledge your debate style as being stupid and annoying. well done. Like i said, you kill discussions because you always think you are right and you can't handle what anyone else says... proof of that is in your super long posts. gg no0b
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
#602
General discussion / Re: Which schemes should die a painful death?
December 11, 2010, 02:23 AM
"I've said it once, i've said it twice, now i'll say it one more time:
"although I don't think any should be removed"
^^ referring to schemes."
Wow!!! how does it feel to have to keep repeating your point whenever someone ignores them and accuses you of something else? because that is what you always do, and then you get upset when people do it to you... you kill debates and discussions just by getting involved in them, because you can say whatever you want to say, and others can't.
"although I don't think any should be removed"
^^ referring to schemes."
Wow!!! how does it feel to have to keep repeating your point whenever someone ignores them and accuses you of something else? because that is what you always do, and then you get upset when people do it to you... you kill debates and discussions just by getting involved in them, because you can say whatever you want to say, and others can't.
#603
General discussion / Re: Which schemes should die a painful death?
December 11, 2010, 01:50 AM
I just find it ironic that komo can't handle his own style of arguing when it is he who is getting attacked by it from someone else.
#604
General discussion / Re: Which schemes should die a painful death?
December 11, 2010, 01:42 AM
I am just trying to be more like you, komo... ignoring all the points you made and replacing them with what I think is really going on... and you and I both know that you and I know what you really think. you want bng to remain just because you like it more than the other schemes... you are BIASED... you like bng more than the others so your opinion is BIASED so i am just gonna disregard your other points because they are irrelevant. At the end of the day, 9 times out of 10, you and I both know your opinion towards bng is biased because you like it and hate the other schemes, end of story. PERIOD.
#605
General discussion / Re: Which schemes should die a painful death?
December 11, 2010, 12:58 AMQuote from: Komo on December 10, 2010, 06:57 PMQuote from: ShyGuy on December 10, 2010, 06:39 PM
komo, is there a particular reason why you want TTRR/Shopper/WxW/Hysteria removed? or is it just because you don't like them and you have a stubborn happiness of what you are used to in a league?Quote from: Komo on December 10, 2010, 01:26 PMso if any scheme should be removed, it should be one of those 4, although I don't think any should be removed
Learn to read, and stop trying to start petty arguements with me, it's pathetic, you don't see me arguing with anyone anymore do you? So why are you still doing it?
I am not starting an argument. I asked you a question.. don't you see the question mark? it was a question. You just inferred something that I didn't imply. Not my fault LOL
#606
General discussion / Re: Which schemes should die a painful death?
December 10, 2010, 06:39 PM
komo, is there a particular reason why you want TTRR/Shopper/WxW/Hysteria removed? or is it just because you don't like them and you have a stubborn happiness of what you are used to in a league?
#607
General discussion / Re: Which schemes should die a painful death?
December 09, 2010, 02:30 PM
Change my vote from proper to bng please. thanks.
#608
Leagues Games Comments / Re: Game #45304, Reported by avirex
November 30, 2010, 02:00 PMQuote from: Komo on November 30, 2010, 12:18 PM
Ah, the arrogant and ignorant banter of people "privately" belittling others...
Let's hear the cover up
In CKC you said Mab, Chicken, and you would win the points and the other members would go and lose them. That was talking behind our backs. Let's hear the cover up, hypocrite

#609
Leagues General / Re: Clans.
November 30, 2010, 12:03 PM
oh yeah, komo, that is me... writing up big old posts at anyone who says my name...
"you always reply but you can't control your foul language or your temper, that, is the difference between us."
No, this is the difference between us:
Me
https://www.tus-wa.com/leagues/game-45304/msg42147/#msg42147
look, i didn't long post anyone to death
vs.
You
THIS VERY THREAD
walls of text.
And I am smarter than you because I didn't make a thread asking a dumbass question. Also, you thinking I joined in proves that you are right about something also makes you dumb
"you always reply but you can't control your foul language or your temper, that, is the difference between us."
No, this is the difference between us:
Me
https://www.tus-wa.com/leagues/game-45304/msg42147/#msg42147
look, i didn't long post anyone to death
vs.
You
THIS VERY THREAD
walls of text.
And I am smarter than you because I didn't make a thread asking a dumbass question. Also, you thinking I joined in proves that you are right about something also makes you dumb

#610
Leagues General / Re: Clans.
November 29, 2010, 09:33 PMQuote from: Komo on November 29, 2010, 01:55 PM
To answer the question, if you had all just stfu and stay away, it would have been:
Question
Ray's answer
Thanks Ray (end)
actually, it could have gone down that way if YOU (komo spirit caps) didn't stfu. You asked your question and got the answer, and then you couldn't let one small post go that was posted after you got the answer... so don't tell us to stfu when you are the biggest pussy crybaby on these forums (edit: oh, but i forgot... you are just tough and defending yourself!! you don't back down for anything because you actually AREN'T a crybaby! dur dur durrrr! shut the f@#! up already). I am smarter than you.
#611
Leagues Games Comments / Re: Game #45304, Reported by avirex
November 26, 2010, 03:30 PMQuote from: Crazy on November 26, 2010, 09:36 AM
Lol you american bastards, if anyone deserves the elite rank it`s uber. First of, he ropes and plays default on a damn laptop (which is a challenge in itsself), secondly, he is one of the top defaulters on TUS, and thirdly, he may not be so strong in RR, but that makes it even harder to achieve that elite rank IMO.. Avi & shy, pooo on your legs in this case, rlybut i love you, so does uber, but poo
i was just trying to list some wormers that achieved or was close to avi's goal that he could relate to skill-wise... but now i see why it is such an insult to uber because avirex sucks

#612
Leagues Playoffs / Re: Arrange the playoffs (IMPORTANT! There will be deadlines!)
November 25, 2010, 05:10 PMQuote from: DarkOne on November 25, 2010, 10:56 AMQuote from: ShyGuy on November 24, 2010, 03:40 AM
tbh, I have seen this thread so many times but I never read it because I thought it was just you yelling at us to get our games done...
You're making it sound like I was being an asshole with these playoffs and I hope I wasn't being one.
you aren't, I just remember another thread on this board that you made that said like "guys, get these games done!". I just thought this was another type of that because of the way the title of this thread is... "Arrange your games here!" wouldn't have been misleading :p
#614
Clans & Communities / Re: FoS Community
November 25, 2010, 02:47 AM
if people knew avi was leader of a community about posting porn and shit like that on a video game forum, his reputation as a human would be in jeopardy