English
Search
My panel
  • Welcome to The Ultimate Site of Worms Armageddon. Please log in or sign up.
Active chat preview
This box automatically views your last visited chat.
Menu

Show posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Show posts Menu

Messages - chakkman

#346
TUS Discussion / Re: Laggy cup pages
March 28, 2011, 06:01 PM
Nope, just when browsing the cup pages, i guess it's due to the interactive groups displays, probably also because of the water and sky thing on top and bottom.
#347
TUS Discussion / Laggy cup pages
March 28, 2011, 04:23 PM
Would be cool if you could do some optimizations so Cup pages don't lag so much, even on a dual core this is laggy as hell...
#348
Sorry for letting you wait but i always looked around for Warg when i was on ag and never saw him online so...
#349
Announcements / Re: TUS Tournaments released
March 21, 2011, 01:24 AM
Same here, still buggy a bit. I guess it'll be sorted out soon.
#350
Husk, what happens when you drown your worm on a map where it's possible? Port next worm to a position before the plop and lose the turn would be the most fair thing i guess.

Damn that pairing tool btw, i always have a clan mate in my groups on the cups...
#351
Leagues Complaints / Re: Regarding ban threads
March 19, 2011, 08:29 PM
1. I think this thread was actually made to prevent from people suggesting to ban each other^^.
2. You don't have any proof that he was actually cheating/using macros. And even if you had proof that he uses macros it's not sure if that's worth a ban. I guess we all have to live with guys being so unskilled that they have to use cheats to get good (or to tap quickly like in this case which is even more pathetic...).
#352
Leagues General / Re: Scheme discussion - T17
March 17, 2011, 04:56 PM
I have an even better solution: Don't change anything about this scheme at all. There are many people who love it how it is. There had also been discussions about changing the random placement at start on the inter scheme. Mostly from people who simply don't like the scheme. I think a change of attitude would be more important than a scheme change. People have to face that luck is a part of the game and accept it. Apart from that i doubt that anyone plays so smart, perfectly or whatever that luck makes a difference. Even if 2 players with the skill play against each other it's a matter of who has the better ideas, is in better day form and such.
#353
Quote from: DarkOne on March 16, 2011, 08:37 PM
Joined as cannon fodder again :)
If i take a look at who joined the cup so far i must say +1...
#354
Leagues General / Re: Scheme discussion - T17
March 16, 2011, 06:21 PM
Quote from: HHC on March 16, 2011, 06:03 PM
7 girders seems fine to me. That's enough for most games, just keeps players from spamming girders from the start.. and it makes sure you've got a way to attack if you're outnumbering the enemy in the end.  It's not easy, as you still gotta fight your way through 7 girders, but it's at least possible. More options = more fun & challenging.
+1

I wouldn't mind to play with inf girders also though. Still i think limiting girders adds something to the scheme. You gotta be economic with your girder usage and can't just "destroy" the game with massive blocking even though the terrain on most maps makes it almost impossible to simply "girder your opponent to sd" anyway.
#355
TdC / Re: husk and other finns or finnish minds
March 14, 2011, 11:41 PM
J'encule Brigitte Bardot dans le cule.
#356
Announcements / Re: TUS schemes
March 14, 2011, 11:34 PM
It would be nice to have the good old rule on any league back... light up and you accept map and scheme. But i guess ppl are too lame nowadays to do so. :(
#357
TdC / Re: What is your favorite smiley!?
March 14, 2011, 07:52 PM
>:-()
#358
TdC / Re: Welcome to D1 in TdC
March 14, 2011, 06:36 PM
Quote from: MonkeyIsland on March 14, 2011, 01:10 PM
I didn't know your marital status is single DakrOne!! :o
Why? You wanna marry him? :P

Anyway, grats do D1 and TdC, good choice for both sides i guess. :)
#359
Quote from: Johnny on March 13, 2011, 03:36 PM
The scheme is not classic and therefore should not be in the classic league. Or maybe someone can give me a definition of classic.
Well the name was probably chosen a bit unlucky. Classic is probably referring not so much to the schemes in it but the type of league. I always wondered about the existence of the hysteria scheme in it too... it kinda came out of nowhere and got mostly pick by guys who can't win any other scheme against you but got decent pretty quickly in hyst as it is a scheme u can get pretty decent in quite quick. And that actually shows the quality of the scheme too, maybe interesting on the surface but it simply lacks depth. Also it kinda represents every lame stuff that you would lose ur credibility for when you did it in any other scheme like bng for example...
#360
General discussion / Re: cheater
March 12, 2011, 08:56 PM
Quote from: Maciej on March 12, 2011, 07:23 PM

I added 2 games, once is my, the other one is Sniper's last clanner, just let's simply check the shadows.

That game actually seems to be more of a case of who's not cheating... their taps all look weird.
Paradise - THeDoGG