Quote from: darkmaul on January 25, 2013, 01:04 PM
I challenge you to 15 games in a row 

Quote from: van on January 18, 2013, 10:43 PM
Biggest fart award goes to lales!

Yeeha.

Well gratz Dulek and Casso, and gj everyone for getting the games done so quickly. Fun cup.

Well you asked if there is any way you can fix this, or if it is a hardware issue, so i said keylock is always a hardware issue, what it is... what you mean is that different keyboards have different kind of keylocks, which is right of course. You will not be able to bypass a keylock with some kind of software though, that's what i wanted to say by saying it is hardware related.

Keylock is always hardware related, no way you can fix this.

Mh, i see now there's a FAQ in the TTRR scheme description. Could be added there then.

Quote from: Prankster on January 14, 2013, 12:53 PM
then calling me an idiot

Who called you an idiot? I only know that you said that i brought the bng argument to piss you off, which can't be a case as i don't know you really, thus i can't know which schemes you play. It's just that bng is a perfect example for a scheme which has to have many rules to allow fair league play.

Apart from that, let's say we write down the rule the way you want it. Then comes the next thing. As there is a Start block on most maps, it would have to be regulated where exactly to place a worm at start. Most games are being started not from the start block, but from the floor on which the start block is. Get what i'm trying to say? Making an easy thing complex. As it is the same for each player, it doesn't even matter where you place your worm, could start from the middle of the map, as long as it is the same for each player.

Quote from: SPW on January 14, 2013, 12:00 AM
Wow, really nice video! Very entertaining and with some awesome moves.

Quality very high. Gj!

Confirmed. 

Quote from: Prankster on January 13, 2013, 05:46 PM
That's actually not true.
So if a scheme is less complex, its rules don't have to be written? Honestly, I don't know what are you trying to say.

So you want an easy scheme like TTRR to be more complex by specifically defining where one has to finish in what way? Besides, as i said, everyone who played more than 2 TTRR's knows, that you can finish your worm in any way, as long as it touches or ends up on the finish. But ok, if you want, this can be added to the rules, it is just that this is as obvious as it is obvious that you have to move your worm from start to finish.

Quote from: Prankster on January 13, 2013, 05:37 PM

Quote from: chakkman on January 13, 2013, 05:25 PM
If you can do a 46 on such a map, then you sure know also that you can end a map by crushing into the ceiling.  Seriously everyone who played 2-3 TTRR's knows this is a valid way to finish a map. Don't have to be "oldschool" to know.

Yeah, why don't we apply that to every scheme?

Probably because there are schemes which are a bit more complex than TTRR. See BnG for example, it needs to be over regulated to make people play fair.

Quote from: Riviva on January 13, 2013, 05:28 PM

Quote from: chakkman on January 13, 2013, 05:25 PM
If you can do a 46 on such a map, then you sure know also that you can end a map by crushing into the ceiling.  Seriously everyone who played 2-3 TTRR's knows this is a valid way to finish a map. Don't have to be "oldschool" to know.

In each league are different rules, Here such I was looking and did not find...

You're right that it is not written in the rules. But imagine how big the rule book would have to be if every eventuality would have to be listed there. And noone would bother reading it either. Therefor the guideline for one should be, if it's allowed in funners, then it's allowed in league games also. Especially in TTRR, as it is played in funners as in league games...

Btw, talking of this, i never liked when peopl touch the finish on the side only. Imo one does have to finish on the finish, or touch the wall behind it. Touching the side feels like cheat really.

If you can do a 46 on such a map, then you sure know also that you can end a map by crushing into the ceiling.  Seriously everyone who played 2-3 TTRR's knows this is a valid way to finish a map. Don't have to be "oldschool" to know.

Grats! Didn't see that it is over yet...

Well, there was a discussion about roper maps some time ago too. I don't really feel the need to bother, if both players enjoy playing on such a map, why not then.

Kind of, 2 weeks after you "deleted" it, they deactivate it, it can't be seen or be searched anymore afaic. It never gets really deleted though, once you login again, it is active again, so it remains on their servers.

Btw, i would like to see the option on TUS, that you can deactivate your account too. A simple option in the user control panel would be enough. That way fake reports against inactive players who didn't visit TUS site for a long time could be avoided too.

Quote from: Ramone on January 07, 2013, 11:56 AM

Quote from: MonkeyIsland on January 07, 2013, 08:24 AM
What good is a discussion when you can't be civilized?

Sry mate, I'm just considering every thread in which Komo post (more than twice) a failed one, no use of it anymore.. So I just took a piss while it's there, I admit.
We'll talk about improving bng maps some other time. (again) :/

Mh, you said yourself that the topic title is "No, no, this ain't a good BnG map! dunno who has put this kind of a map as a "standard" one? Was it Komo?" Can't be surprised then really when he answers on it.