Quote from: Komo on June 04, 2010, 06:14 AM
I don't care what anyone says about this match or me, the 2 players involved in this game for TpM are the worst BnG'rs I have ever played and would advise ALL clans that enjoy a proper, good BnG match to avoid them, I would easily annihilate all 3 players for TpM at BnG and it just really really annoys me I couldn't do anything because they have 2 shots to me and doing those grenades every single shot and hitting always 1/2 of those shots in this 2on2.

Quote from: Komo on June 04, 2010, 04:53 AMYou should all think about that, grow up, and treat each other the way you would like to be treated.

Great lession of life, yeah. Wonder if it also applies to you or if you are ahead of things.

Grats Crazy.

Hm just realized this cup is 3 months old lol...

Well Ibrahimovic has one of the biggest ego of all football players... he's damn good though. But the money f@#!ed him up a bit yeah.

[OmG`Leone89] whit my cock i could hit your shithead

LOL

Quote from: Komo on May 28, 2010, 04:49 PM
Yes I agree, what you are saying Chicken done, in my opinion is lame, but if you were throwing repeat 3s nades and rolling 4s nades, then I think what he done is right and pretty fair.

Please don't turn this around man... they were 1st to accuse us of throwing lame rolling nades, we just asked if what Chicken did wasn't darksiding after they complained about our nade shots. If our shots were lame or not also is in the eye of the beholder, see for yourself if their hides didn't enforce roll shots. Seriously we were playing just like in any other league game and no1 complained about it.

That doesn't convince me one bit as when you take a look at ANY other scheme, rules are made to prevent players from getting theirselves into positions where their opponent can't attack them. E.g. the disallowed glitch on t17 where you port yourself on top of the map, the anti-blocking rule on roper, anti permanent block rule in shopper and so on.

I give you an example: You get yourself into a position from which you can bounce shoot a nade and you are able to hit your opponent, but hes not able to hit you, so he shoots the terrain for 5 or 6 turns to make it possible to hit you. Isn't that extremely lame? Wasn't the case with you Chicken, as i hit you (altho with big luck). Just an example of how a game could look like according to your rule.

Me too

You mean a hole like Chicken23 picked as hide in that game?

Uzur, please disallow Glitches and permanent blocks, no fun with those... imagine getting 2 of your worms blocked by bow early in the game...

Considering darksiding as not being able to hit or be hit with a nade is a completely new aspect actually Ramone. Chicken23 and others argued like it was darksiding when you can't hit your opponent/he can't hit you with a nade or zook. To me your rule makes much more sense than the nade or zook thing, as the scheme is called "BnG" and not "Bazooka" or something.

I also still wait for the explanation why it should be senseful to get your worm into a hide from which you can't attack, nobody could explain that so far... people rather trust in rules that seem to be written into stone, while in the leagues i have played i have never come along the "darksiding is considered moving in a place where you can't hit or be hit by nade/zook".

Well, don't get me wrong i used to enjoy BnG's but that was before i realized that this is a easy-to-be-complaint scheme. If every1 would accept that this game should be played "for the win" in the league just like any other scheme it would make things much easier. Now we have the situation that certain people expect you to play it just like a rope warmer and that's why things are getting complicated. <- referring to this thread in general

Never seen some1 doing it, so i can't tell. Makes exactly zero sense to me. But well i'm quite a new player with my 4 years of experience or so, so wth do i know.

You know i still think it makes much more sense to forbid to move into a position from which you can attack your opponent but he cannot attack you rather than to forbid moving into a position from which you can't attack/can't be attacked. No harm done by that, don't you think? Still i was proved wrong by some old school fashioned guys who rely on a non-sense rule created before World War II, so no point in discussing with guys that are immune towards logic.

I can just agree with TheDogg. And Crazy, seriously spoken your name is an insult for people from the lunatic asylum.

I actually think you are overreacting a bit Crazy. I mean this is a game and people pick their nicks for fun, there's not too much thinking behind it mostly i guess.  

Quote from: THeDoGG on May 20, 2010, 08:18 PM
THAT SUX !

No. Blue please.