Nope, just when browsing the cup pages, i guess it's due to the interactive groups displays, probably also because of the water and sky thing on top and bottom.
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
#347
TUS Discussion / Laggy cup pages
March 28, 2011, 04:23 PM
Would be cool if you could do some optimizations so Cup pages don't lag so much, even on a dual core this is laggy as hell...
#348
Cups and Tournaments Comments / Re: Cup #120: team17 for all #6
March 28, 2011, 03:46 PM
Sorry for letting you wait but i always looked around for Warg when i was on ag and never saw him online so...
#349
Announcements / Re: TUS Tournaments released
March 21, 2011, 01:24 AM
Same here, still buggy a bit. I guess it'll be sorted out soon.
#350
Cups and Tournaments Comments / Re: Cup #132: Wascar
March 20, 2011, 12:54 AM
Husk, what happens when you drown your worm on a map where it's possible? Port next worm to a position before the plop and lose the turn would be the most fair thing i guess.
Damn that pairing tool btw, i always have a clan mate in my groups on the cups...
Damn that pairing tool btw, i always have a clan mate in my groups on the cups...
#351
Leagues Complaints / Re: Regarding ban threads
March 19, 2011, 08:29 PM
1. I think this thread was actually made to prevent from people suggesting to ban each other^^.
2. You don't have any proof that he was actually cheating/using macros. And even if you had proof that he uses macros it's not sure if that's worth a ban. I guess we all have to live with guys being so unskilled that they have to use cheats to get good (or to tap quickly like in this case which is even more pathetic...).
2. You don't have any proof that he was actually cheating/using macros. And even if you had proof that he uses macros it's not sure if that's worth a ban. I guess we all have to live with guys being so unskilled that they have to use cheats to get good (or to tap quickly like in this case which is even more pathetic...).
#352
Leagues General / Re: Scheme discussion - T17
March 17, 2011, 04:56 PM
I have an even better solution: Don't change anything about this scheme at all. There are many people who love it how it is. There had also been discussions about changing the random placement at start on the inter scheme. Mostly from people who simply don't like the scheme. I think a change of attitude would be more important than a scheme change. People have to face that luck is a part of the game and accept it. Apart from that i doubt that anyone plays so smart, perfectly or whatever that luck makes a difference. Even if 2 players with the skill play against each other it's a matter of who has the better ideas, is in better day form and such.
#353
Cups and Tournaments Comments / Re: Cup #132: Wascar
March 17, 2011, 04:50 PMQuote from: DarkOne on March 16, 2011, 08:37 PMIf i take a look at who joined the cup so far i must say +1...
Joined as cannon fodder again
#354
Leagues General / Re: Scheme discussion - T17
March 16, 2011, 06:21 PMQuote from: HHC on March 16, 2011, 06:03 PM+1
7 girders seems fine to me. That's enough for most games, just keeps players from spamming girders from the start.. and it makes sure you've got a way to attack if you're outnumbering the enemy in the end. It's not easy, as you still gotta fight your way through 7 girders, but it's at least possible. More options = more fun & challenging.
I wouldn't mind to play with inf girders also though. Still i think limiting girders adds something to the scheme. You gotta be economic with your girder usage and can't just "destroy" the game with massive blocking even though the terrain on most maps makes it almost impossible to simply "girder your opponent to sd" anyway.
#355
TdC / Re: husk and other finns or finnish minds
March 14, 2011, 11:41 PM
J'encule Brigitte Bardot dans le cule.
#356
Announcements / Re: TUS schemes
March 14, 2011, 11:34 PM
It would be nice to have the good old rule on any league back... light up and you accept map and scheme. But i guess ppl are too lame nowadays to do so.

#358
TdC / Re: Welcome to D1 in TdC
March 14, 2011, 06:36 PMQuote from: MonkeyIsland on March 14, 2011, 01:10 PMWhy? You wanna marry him?
I didn't know your marital status is single DakrOne!!

Anyway, grats do D1 and TdC, good choice for both sides i guess.

#359
TUS Discussion / Re: rules change request for Hysteria in clanners
March 13, 2011, 06:06 PMQuote from: Johnny on March 13, 2011, 03:36 PMWell the name was probably chosen a bit unlucky. Classic is probably referring not so much to the schemes in it but the type of league. I always wondered about the existence of the hysteria scheme in it too... it kinda came out of nowhere and got mostly pick by guys who can't win any other scheme against you but got decent pretty quickly in hyst as it is a scheme u can get pretty decent in quite quick. And that actually shows the quality of the scheme too, maybe interesting on the surface but it simply lacks depth. Also it kinda represents every lame stuff that you would lose ur credibility for when you did it in any other scheme like bng for example...
The scheme is not classic and therefore should not be in the classic league. Or maybe someone can give me a definition of classic.
#360
General discussion / Re: cheater
March 12, 2011, 08:56 PMQuote from: Maciej on March 12, 2011, 07:23 PMThat game actually seems to be more of a case of who's not cheating... their taps all look weird.
I added 2 games, once is my, the other one is Sniper's last clanner, just let's simply check the shadows.