Every time I read "telecow" my eyes bleed. Had to throw that in. Please continue.

I was just making a joke. Or was I? Huehuehue.
Nice Komo reaction though. Everyone knows we can beat dt with or without Mablak, we just didn't do it the last few times. 

Very generous of you SPW.

Cheers buddy, glad we solved the confusion.

Quote from: SPW on December 08, 2013, 09:26 AM
We dont wanna destroy our nice overall stats, thats for sure. So we always try to have best lineups. This means, that I dont play clanners with one of you alone. Maybe there are some clans willing do defaults only, but thats not the main thing. Usually, we need, including me, 3 guys online. I prefer that we only play clanner when 3 of us are online.

You're probably talking about this paragraph. The whole point of playing with a strong roster is to be able to play every scheme at a high level. Ergo, it's basically to avoid avoiding. I don't get what you're on about.

You're forgetting (or ignoring) the fact that it's also a clan league, not a whichever two individuals are online league. I'm sorry to say but your argument is invalid.

But I think I know what the problem is.

Imagine these two scenarios:
1.) CF has an internal agreement, we all meet up on Ventrilo and join WormNET only as a group when we're all ready and want to play clanners.
2.) CF join WormNET one by one and wait for the others there. As soon as two of us are online people immediately assume that they can ask us to play a clanner and we have to agree.

It's basically the same thing, yet one kind of behavior does absolutely nothing while the other one makes people grab their pitchforks.

Why do you think this is the case?

Quote from: Ryan on December 12, 2013, 07:51 AM
I am not asking anyone to fool around, I am asking you to play fair.
You pick, we pick, no avoiding, simple.

I totally respect your skill, but not the way you propose to use it.

You really want to play a TTRR clanner against SPW don't you? Would be amazing competition. If you want default wins look somewhere else, it's that simple.

Quote from: Free on December 12, 2013, 04:13 AM
dtMablak tactic is simply the best: have fundon't play during season and just have your lackeys make po, win po = simple.

Ftfy.  jk, or am I?

franz left CF quite a while ago to try and revive six together with Mil2 (for the third time or so?) I think. But Crash makes up for that I guess.

No we don't. It's always been CFs philosophy to play clanners when there are enough people online to cover most of the schemes. It's not our fault you guys aren't taking league games serious, I'll kindly ask you to stop trying to encourage us to fool around. Cheers.

Quote from: NinjaCamel on December 11, 2013, 12:08 PM
There should be the home clan and the league clan. I dont want to leave TdC but it would be fun and fresh to play sometimes with totally new line up. Not sure if i had enough time to play that much tho.

I agree, there was a number of times when I felt like changing clans either because I was bored or my clanmates weren't active. In the end I decided to stick with my clan and continued to be bored and/or inactive. It doesn't really make sense - I think we make those decisions because in W:A we all have known each other for so long and spent a couple years, some even a decade together and because we have a very limited amount of players/clans. For example, I had no problem leaving my (now former) Dota 2 team in a heartbeat because I haven't known the guys for as long (no real attachment) and I can just look for a new team when I feel like it, there are literally thousands looking for players.

If only people on W:A weren't so quick in calling someone a clan hopper, it's not as bad as it sounds in my opinion. In the end we all just want to have fun and need some fresh wind from time to time.

That's not even my point.
Anyway back to topic. I don't really care about the PS4, I never had a PS (more of a Nintendo guy), it's enough for me that every other friend has one so I get to play FIFA sometimes.

It's pretty damn obvious from the post itself, I didn't need to use Google to see that there's sort of a 'formatting error' and words in :: usually are smileys, that's like internet 101. I meant no harm either, just wanted to point it out. No f@#!ing clue why you'd get worked up over such a trivial matter. 

Ah, nothing. Nothing at all. :Saboteur:

Nice copy pasta.