just wondering if anyone has an opinion on this weird scenario ;o

at 22:21, artic starts his turn that ends with him blocking himself with my worm.  mirux tries to attack (but the zook sinks ), and at 23:34 artic can't get out.

is this still a block needing penalty? or was it his fault that he block himself with my worm?  ;x

just every so often.  making them as I go.  thanks 

WACL?  yeah that was a while ago.  what clans were you in?  can you name any wormers that you knew?

what exactly did you want explained?  try playing some singles games and learn some of the new schemes, or download some replays of games already played to learn that way.  gl

intense last few turns.. I knew you had a rope, and so did I.. but I thought I could outlast you since you had no girders and I was so far away.  gj last turn

Quote from: Komo on September 23, 2010, 11:23 AM
Question: Why do you bother making the playoffs for ANY future season when you already have playoffs waiting to be finished?

And if you even dare say "Because I was just playing for fun and made playoffs anyway" Then that excuse backfires with the fact that you should accept the responsibility of playing the playoffs you made them, OR you should use the selection to exclude you from the playoffs if you don't have the time, like myself, I passed up on the playoffs when I finished 1st on my 1st season, I didn't know there was an option to turn off Playoffs, but I made a post to be excluded. I took responsibility, you on the other hand, knew WO would interfere with the playoffs and instead of opting out while busy with WO you decided to stall your games.

Anyone who hasn't finished playoffs should not even be eligible to make any future playoffs.  I don't see why this doesn't make sense.  It gives people an incentive to finish their playoffs if they actually care about any future games, which should be everyone unless a person quit.

Add it to the rules?  Make a poll to see if anyone agrees?

the ending xD

Quote from: Madden on September 17, 2010, 02:32 PM
I dislike it and wish disease and impotence on those who practice it, but it seems most people don't disagree with it so I'll keep quietly stewing while hiding on the sides huheiheieui.

xD

yeah I used to ask before every roper if they like hide on top, because I don't mind doing it or not doing it as long as we agree.  it was just annoying to have to ask every game though, so I stopped    I just assume everyone hides on top now.

it's impossible to make a rule against hiding on top, so I've accepted it and stopped trying to see it as lame or cheap.  it gives the losing player almost no hope of coming back, so you can see why they might get angry... but really, if you're losing by that much in the first place, you should be angry at yourself 

ok, this is my re-report of a clanner.  it was the 1st game with TaG, so it should be put before game #39114.

thank you

on the report page, when you select from 1v1 to 2v2, can the default be clanner instead of singles?

oh, and thank you   i'll report now.

Accident, reported this as a singles 2v2 when it was a clanner.  It wouldn't let me report the clanner correctly after because it uses the same replay.  remove please, so I can report the clanner -.-  sorry

hahahah.. first time seeing this, and wow... haha, I can't stop laughing.  shot of the year

what does this feature do?

no, I used normal sheep on my first rope, but ss works even if it didn't go in the tunnel, to try around.

nice aim