I think the points won/lost should be calculated from clan's scheme ratings instead of the players playing the clanner

why? because clan is as strong as its weakest player

For starters, I would start picking things like Elite/T17/TTRR WAY WAY more often and BnG less and less, if the points weren't so shit for clanners.

I could happily play T17/Elite with Peja and not risk losing HHC/barmans T17/Elite points...

Same with TTRR etc...

lol why is peja always the man at the bottom of your list??

peja is the boss in elite, you havent noticed?


but yeah, if the games were calculated by the specific team, not the clan you would see more activity... clans wont wait until they have the ideal players, they will play more freely, pick a wider variety of schemes, etc...


i dont think this will change tho... doesnt seem like too many people are interested.

Quote from: avirex on March 22, 2013, 07:57 PM
lol why is peja always the man at the bottom of your list??

peja is the boss in elite, you havent noticed?


but yeah, if the games were calculated by the specific team, not the clan you would see more activity... clans wont wait until they have the ideal players, they will play more freely, pick a wider variety of schemes, etc...


i dont think this will change tho... doesnt seem like too many people are interested.

it could change if we had a clear idea from where to get these ratings for the players who played the clanner...

Lol avi, I am actually at bottom of the list, Peja is above me

It's like can't cook & won't cook together xD

woot your a f@#!ing legend in this game and im just a troll and a idiot lol 

thats a good point husk, that would be the next phase of the discussion i spose...


but whats the point of taking it there when only about 4 people have showed interest in this change? others either troller, or did not post.

Well avi, no one's complained yet, that's a 1st