W2B

Kradie · February 11, 2016, 03:20 PM

Whoever gave this a bad rating, has surely no balls to stand up and explain as to why they gave such low score.

VoK · February 11, 2016, 03:30 PM

pecouse we have elite , roper , wxw , bng and hyst we just dont need new schemes.

Sbaffo · February 11, 2016, 03:34 PM

coz it sucks

Kradie · February 11, 2016, 03:36 PM

Quote from: VoK on February 11, 2016, 03:30 PM
pecouse we have elite , roper , wxw , bng and hyst we just dont need new schemes.

That does not excuse to neglect new content from other.

Quote from: Sbaffo on February 11, 2016, 03:34 PM
coz it sucks

Have you tried it?

Peja · February 11, 2016, 03:38 PM

too lazy to read all the rules

spleen17 · February 11, 2016, 05:19 PM

It's a good scheme. You guys are assholes.

Sbaffo · February 11, 2016, 05:48 PM

It's an easier version wxw, that's what it looks, am i an asshole for giving my opinion? He asked for it, and i gave it.

Kradie · February 11, 2016, 06:10 PM

Quote from: Sbaffo on February 11, 2016, 05:48 PM
It's an easier version wxw, that's what it looks, am i an asshole for giving my opinion? He asked for it, and i gave it.

Sbaffo, all you said was ''It sucks''Without any detail on as to why it ''sucks''
Now you are saying it is an easier version of WxW.
The scheme gradually becomes more difficult as players play. A map can feat up to 10 walls, the more section walls you destroy, the more walls there are to touch. Ergo the game becomes harder, with new and sometimes complex routes. The girders compensate the rise of the difficulty, it lets players patch up section walls to downgrade difficulty, as well blocking worms in sections. So there are some strategy here.

spleen17 · February 11, 2016, 06:17 PM

Quote from: Sbaffo on February 11, 2016, 05:48 PM
It's an easier version wxw, that's what it looks, am i an asshole for giving my opinion? He asked for it, and i gave it.

It's not easier, it's way harder. Did you see the maps?

If your opinion is based on a 2 second glance of the scheme settings then no, no one wants to hear it.

Sbaffo · February 11, 2016, 06:26 PM

Quote from: spleen17 on February 11, 2016, 06:17 PM
Quote from: Sbaffo on February 11, 2016, 05:48 PM
It's an easier version wxw, that's what it looks, am i an asshole for giving my opinion? He asked for it, and i gave it.

It's not easier, it's way harder. Did you see the maps?

If your opinion is based on a 2 second glance of the scheme settings then no, no one wants to hear it.

That may harder for you, i find it easier honestly

Kradie · February 11, 2016, 07:01 PM

Quote from: Sbaffo on February 11, 2016, 06:26 PM
Quote from: spleen17 on February 11, 2016, 06:17 PM
Quote from: Sbaffo on February 11, 2016, 05:48 PM
It's an easier version wxw, that's what it looks, am i an asshole for giving my opinion? He asked for it, and i gave it.

It's not easier, it's way harder. Did you see the maps?

If your opinion is based on a 2 second glance of the scheme settings then no, no one wants to hear it.

That may harder for you, i find it easier honestly

Have you tried it yet?

Husk · February 12, 2016, 05:20 AM

well the amount of text makes people not want to read the rules...

just put 3 simple lines:

do this

do that

attack

XanKriegor · February 12, 2016, 06:30 AM

Example replay would answer all questions, eventually.

Kradie · February 12, 2016, 08:33 AM

I appreciate the proper feedback and I have edited the description. I hope that will suffice.

nabwhoo · February 12, 2016, 11:44 AM

The maps need more work, rather than churning out map after map spend time perfecting one with a better design. Be a bit more Steve Jobs, you can't get the numbers till you have a product.

W2B

Scheme #1938, Viewed 5666 Time(s)