English
Main Menu
My panel

  • Welcome to The Ultimate Site of Worms Armageddon. Please log in or sign up.
Active chat preview

This box automatically views your last visited chat.

Shopper

Tournament #918, Viewed 4304 Time(s)

Basic Information
Moderators

4.25 / 5
Total Members Voted: 4
Log
Signups
31 minutes
Knockouts
98 minutes
Name: Shopper
Type: Public
Game type: 1vs1
Created: February 12, 2017, 12:48 PM

Tournament scheme(s): scheme Shopper Cup
Click on the book to download the scheme. Click on the scheme name to view the scheme page.

Signups time: February 18, 2017, 06:00 PM

Finished


Description:
Signups open at 18:00 GMT and are open for ~20 mins

Games are played on #RopersHeaven channel

The cup scheme is based on the scheme of First Blood league, read description

Use this map pack only: https://www.tus-wa.com/maps/mappack-441/

4 worms per player

Rules:
- Crate Before Attack (CBA). If you break this rule, you are not allowed to attack the next turn.
- No permanent blocks (with Longbow)

All games best of one

:-\ If you host with HostingBuddy, you can load the correct settings this way:
!tusscheme 2279
!tusmap pack:441
!worms 4

Knockout



Final

VoK Finland
TdCVDVea

Bronze Match

Gold

VoK Finland
TdCVDVea

Silver

Bronze


VoK Finland
TdCVDVea


VoK Finland
TdCVDVea

VoK Finland
TdCVDVea


0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

nino

You Are Losing Time Reading my Signature.

TheKomodo

#16
MI, I see this behavior in managers and leaders quite often, instead of accepting the fault, and/or mistake, you make excuses and try and pass the blame on to other people, i've also been guilty of it myself, I don't expect you to take this on board and honestly don't care if you do, I still respect you for everything you've done for the community, everyone makes mistakes we're only human :)

I(for one), totally understand there are ways to avoid the Tournament system faults, hence why I am a Tournaments Moderator, and I have added players in after the Tournament has began before just like you suggested, it's only happened a few times though, but in those cases it was more like we had 7 players, and needed 1 more, or we had 14-15 players and needed an extra few, and that's back when people were more active.

As you said, I would never start a Tournament with 9 players, I would always kick the last player to join.

That isn't even the problem here, the problem is how XanKriegor managed to get 3rd place in a 9 player Tournament, without winning a single game, claiming more points in the Tournaments standings than for example Senator, who at least won a game lol.

Please correct me if I am wrong:

Xan gets 2 free rounds - Could you please tell me if this counts as a win or not? (I can't find information about this anywhere)

Xan loses to VoK

Xan automatically gets 3rd place(and because it's more than 8 players Tournament, he receives 20 points), minus the 5 points he lost against VoK, 15 points, if he got 5+5 for the 2 free wins, he got a total of 25 points, for just being lucky, if not he still receives 15 points more than the 0 points Senator earned for winning 5 then losing 5.

This is why the Tournaments system is flawed, not because of anything you said in your entire post, and that's why I said pass the blame because you still haven't even admitted that there is a problem lol.

I don't know how to code Tournament systems, it's something i've never researched(yet), I am coming to you, who I consider an expert in coding asking if you can update the system in some way to prevent this from happening, please :)

P.S. - I must add, yes this flaw can be avoided by not starting with 9 players lol, but that's why it's a flaw, because it CAN happen :D And well look, it did :P

MarianRV


XanKriegor

Nothing here to congratulate.