Quote

UC`Wormgamer`dS..``UC`ZxrZ`DOS``: no...
UC`Wormgamer`dS..``UC`ZxrZ`DOS``: torch
UC`Wormgamer`dS..``UC`ZxrZ`DOS``: or sg
UC`Wormgamer`dS..``UC`ZxrZ`DOS``: xd
``UC`ZxrZ`DOS``..UC`Wormgamer`dS: too late
UC`Wormgamer`dS..``UC`ZxrZ`DOS``: bow push to much
``UC`ZxrZ`DOS``..UC`Wormgamer`dS: pinned chat
UC`Wormgamer`dS..``UC`ZxrZ`DOS``: torch was better ;]
``UC`ZxrZ`DOS``..UC`Wormgamer`dS: now i have pinned chat
UC`Wormgamer`dS..``UC`ZxrZ`DOS``: okz
UC`Wormgamer`dS..``UC`ZxrZ`DOS``: ae
``UC`ZxrZ`DOS``..UC`Wormgamer`dS: XD

I don't like this. This was supposed to be a 1v1 match.
I'd rather like play against one player instead of a pair discussing strategy with a pinned chat.
The game was close enough for any unfair advantage like this having a chance to be crucial.

As you can see, i didnt asked for help, but he preffered to help me

Hmm i dont see anything worth to complain imo. I see that WG told some stratregy in a single round but you won that round anyway. Or maybe its about your principles i guess.

Lol nice sheeet !!!

Well, it is undeniable WG did something he shouldn't, due to not knowing; he's regretting it now, and he promised not to do it ever again.

However, yes, I've considered that Zexorz didn't ask, which makes him slightly less at fault (I mean, if he asked, I'd most likely have delete the game), and that barman won the round (don't get me wrong: what happened shouldn't have happened and that's for sure, there again, but removing that round would penalize barman, who only was a victim in this cheating situation).

Now, this is the first time I see this happening in any of my cups, and WG promised not to do it ever again, as I explained him why it was bad; now though, if you want to be perfectly sure this won't happen in the future, I'm not against disallowing spectators. I'm really sorry that happened.