I totally just disagree with everything you said at me Free, I just see things differently and have a different opinion from you, so whetever lol.
Now this might look like I think mm sucks or something which is the complete opposite, they always have and always will continue to impress and inspire me for certain reasons, but anyway here:
I don't feel mm are as strong as you think in clanners, where you consider "winning the PO" as the only thing that matters, regardless of how they managed to do this and the circumstances, I feel the complete opposite, IMO mm's 3 strongest schemes in the playoffs are BnG, TTRR, Elite, BnG only because Mablak taught Barman to notch, your competition for BnG is at an advantage because of notching, soon when others know how to notch, this won't be as easy for you, I honestly feel cFc had good chance of winning if I wasn't such a fussy twat and gave away the BnG cuz I didn't wanna play lame at 1st and then quit, and I didn't want to play Hysteria either and imo me/daina are cFc's best Hysteria team, so that's 2 schemes already you won easy, you don't have to care or agree with it, but just think about that, and remember it.
TTRR I feel is pretty much equal when mm's and cfc's top TTRR players are at their best, sometimes Mablak gets 4/5 seconds faster than most so that may give them the edge, but in Clanners, live, he's more human than in the challenges.
All other schemes I feel would just go 50/50 because of things like luck/who starts etc, look how well eS done against mm, they lost 3-2, that's only 1 game from winning...
ps, CKC, CF, cfc could all win PO just as "easily" as mm, this is why I feel "overall" is more important to me personally, even if Mablak was as active as the rest of us, I still feel the standings would pretty much be the same because it's still 2v2/3v3 games and not everyone is Mablak or Random or ArtiC lol.