Forums
May 19, 2024, 05:57 AM

Author Topic: Changing Classic League Schemes  (Read 24806 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline avirex

Re: Changing Classic League Schemes
« Reply #300 on: August 16, 2012, 01:56 AM »
i have only played aerial a few times, and i liked the scheme...

it seemed much more challenging, and i really had to think of what to do, and where to hide, and how to approach each turn....

i think thats a scheme that could really take time to master, and be a skillfull scheme that everyone would enjoy...

but as shy said, hysteria is just full of flaws, and 1 second is just a mess... it turns into killing yourself on purpose... when clanning with shy, ill often just kill myself and let him win.. its much easier that way.... noone thinks thats a problem??

there really is no learning curve (as many have mentioned) to hysteria... any random person can come to Wnet, and play hysteria...  sure, some are good... some are better, and some are great at the scheme...  but that does not mean the scheme is not flawed... of course Random00 is going to have a high win percentage in hysteria, his knowlede and understanding of the game, and weapons is above alot of players (and certainly above the newbs that pick it against him, out of fear of trying him in other schemes)

i agree with everyone here though, everyone has some good points....

ropa and shyguy both make good points the scheme needs to be updated (the facts are, the scheme was never meant to be in league.... it was meant for fun... so it obviously needs to be tweaked)

HHC's good point was that nothing will ever come of this thread :P

Offline Husk

Re: Changing Classic League Schemes
« Reply #301 on: August 16, 2012, 03:56 AM »
we pick hysteria because it's fun O= not because we have better chance to win in it compared to other schemes

Do you have any data to back this up? Or is this just what you want to believe and hope that by repeating it many times it eventually becomes true?
Can you elaborate? Why do you think "fun" is the reason and not "small learning curve therefore anyone can get decent at it and actually win games in a league"?

excuse me, let me rephrase my words:

I pick hysteria because it's fun O= not because I have better chance to win in it compared to other schemes

and sometimes when we r clanning, my clan mate let's me pick and I pick what I find fun

Offline Hussar

Re: Changing Classic League Schemes
« Reply #302 on: August 16, 2012, 07:41 AM »
well, aerial is much funniest then hysteria for me Husky.

Offline Husk

Re: Changing Classic League Schemes
« Reply #303 on: August 16, 2012, 08:25 AM »
are we allowed to pick aerial in classic league? =P

yeah I like aerial alot more than hyst

Offline TheKomodo

Re: Changing Classic League Schemes
« Reply #304 on: August 18, 2012, 08:04 PM »
Instead of talking about it, can you just find some replays please and we can do what MI done.

I strongly believe you will never find a game that proves anything you say.

Re: Changing Classic League Schemes
« Reply #305 on: August 18, 2012, 08:21 PM »
but as shy said, hysteria is just full of flaws, and 1 second is just a mess... it turns into killing yourself on purpose... when clanning with shy, ill often just kill myself and let him win.. its much easier that way.... noone thinks thats a problem??

One way to counter this is not to make use of the WA team system, i.e. playing with 4 colours instead of 2.

Offline Doubletime

  • Sr. Member
  • ****

  • Sweden Sweden
  • Posts: 442
    • View Profile
Re: Changing Classic League Schemes
« Reply #306 on: September 05, 2012, 06:14 PM »
Hysteria is a good scheme...For funners with several players..As it stands now it is not suitable for a leauge..Perhaps if we added a limited ammount of teleports ? That could propably make it more feasible....oh well i would still much rather remove it and replace it with intermidiate luckless.

I have almost opposed shoppa...It is like russian roullete...Just remove it..

Offline Korydex

Re: Changing Classic League Schemes
« Reply #307 on: June 02, 2015, 05:02 PM »
del
« Last Edit: May 19, 2016, 05:23 PM by Korydex »

Offline Chelsea

Re: Changing Classic League Schemes
« Reply #308 on: June 02, 2015, 06:07 PM »
i'd remove hysteria cos there's bng, remove shopper and wxw cos there's roper. and add br cos there's ttrr.
bng, elite, roper, team17, rr, br - sound good? :-)

lol nope xD

boom race is funny but i don't think, it should be in calsic league :D

replace ttrr by big RR and hysteria by aerial :D and maybe BnG by forts :D

Offline MarianRV

Re: Changing Classic League Schemes
« Reply #309 on: June 02, 2015, 06:14 PM »
replace  hysteria by aerial
Hell no!

Offline Triad

Re: Changing Classic League Schemes
« Reply #310 on: June 02, 2015, 06:36 PM »
Add Darts, there's no luck factor at Darts.

Ah, but Darts is a nope for the most of people. xd



Offline Korydex

Re: Changing Classic League Schemes
« Reply #311 on: June 02, 2015, 06:36 PM »
del
« Last Edit: May 19, 2016, 05:23 PM by Korydex »

Offline Chelsea

Re: Changing Classic League Schemes
« Reply #312 on: June 02, 2015, 06:56 PM »
it's battle race... :-[

battle race suck xD

Offline Peja

Re: Changing Classic League Schemes
« Reply #313 on: June 02, 2015, 07:07 PM »
chelsea would love to play battlerace if there would be jetpacks in crates  ;D
VoK: i have now beer so my rope will be perfect.
 VoK: will do ttrr every map under 30s

Offline Csongi

Re: Changing Classic League Schemes
« Reply #314 on: June 02, 2015, 07:53 PM »
remove shopper and wxw cos there's roper

wut ?  ;o
"Every day I get up and look through the Forbes list of the richest people in America. If I'm not there, I go to work." - Robert Orben

[avirex`mm] ill rape ur mother
[avirex`mm] twice in the same night
[avirex`mm] and she will ask for a third
[avirex`mm] cuz she's a whore

kins> Don't let girls ruins ur tus games :)