Leagues > Leagues

Game #188407, reported by Chicken23

<< < (2/2)

MarianRV:

--- Quote from: Chelsea on April 07, 2015, 09:12 AM ---
--- Quote from: pizzasheet on April 07, 2015, 09:05 AM ---
--- Quote from: Chelsea on April 07, 2015, 09:01 AM ---
--- Quote from: MonkeyIsland on April 07, 2015, 04:45 AM ---Something in Chicken's scheme is starting to smell ;)

--- End quote ---

He doesn't Play at league scheme, but at other one... ::)

--- End quote ---

atleast he doesnt avoid,

--- End quote ---

like you  ::)

--- End quote ---
Interesting talk we have here :)

Chrischi:

--- Quote from: MonkeyIsland on April 07, 2015, 04:45 AM ---Something in Chicken's scheme is starting to smell ;)

--- End quote ---

oh yeah, last game he had Nanas, and this game sheeps... next time i bring my own scheme :D

Senator:

--- Quote from: MonkeyIsland on April 07, 2015, 04:45 AM ---Something in Chicken's scheme is starting to smell ;)

--- End quote ---

Yep, Chicken's scheme gives slightly more aquas, missiles, pigeons and bananas. I would keep probabilities for those weapons the same as in TUS scheme.

Husk:
increasing the probability of SD weapons decreases of chances of only 1 player having a SD weapon... something to keep in mind =)

SPW:
But the chance for that scenario is really low. So better both players having more chances to get a lategame weapon. Its more fair, imo. 1 or 4 aquas, doesnt matter. Its just an overkill and with the standard scheme the same like having one aqua and your opponent zero.

Alltogether, better odds for both picking a lategame weapon means better balance.

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[*] Previous page