I thought my description was quite unambiguous in my post, since turn time is used the same way everywhere.
Well, problem is, you said "amount of time you spent playing", not turn time. But you've edited it now, thank you!
Also I see something in that scoring method I wouldn't have known otherwise, until you edited it just now: That you don't add a 3 second penalty for the last turn if the retreat was not used. That means some of my submitted runs will score better than I thought. Corrections:
My 177.22s run is actually 174.22s
My 182.96s run is actually 179.96s
After all, when I ask you to describe for example hysteria, don't you say you get 1 second turn time and 5 seconds retreat time? It's also the term used in logs, so I figured you'd appreciate it if I used that terminology
Perfect, thank you. As long as I know that you're using "turn time" in that sense, I'm fine with it
The reason I wasn't sure is that in TCB you used to use the term differently. Now we can finally put that behind us.
What makes you think I remember the exact wording on TCB when I don't even remember the rules for a lot of challenges?
I didn't know you didn't still have the archive of TCB descriptions, maps, and schemes. I assumed you had it, because where else would you be getting the maps? And you got the scoring method for TCB challenge #22 exactly how it was on TCB, so naturally I just assumed you had all the old descriptions. If you didn't... well, great memory!
I don't like having to explain every minute detail about a challenge because there will always be something left to comment on and it would require an extraordinary amount of text to een attemp to remove all doubt - which leads to people not reading the wall of text.
Being precise doesn't necessarily mean being very wordy!
I volunteer to be a challenge description editor. The way I envision it is this: MonkeyIsland sets up something where I get auto-emailed whenever a new challenge is posted. If I see ambiguity in the wording, I ask the author to clear it up, then I edit the description, keeping it concise and as brief as possible while eliminating the ambiguity.
Having linkified text would help a lot. A term that might potentially be seen as ambiguous could be underlined, and clicking it would bring up a little text box clarifying it. For example: "No
skipwalking allowed." Clicking it would bring up a definition, which includes both skipwalking and flipwalking (in case somebody thinks they skirt around this rule by doing flipwalking instead of skipwalking).