So why wouldn't governments around the world go back to the normal? Because it is not profitable. Why end wars? Why end terrorism? It is not profitable, fear drives it, and Covid-19 is pinnacle of profitability. CCP, WHO, EU, Globalists, Green activists, Big Tech, MSM, & Vaccine Companies, they are the real winners, while we run around as their guinea pigs. The Media, the driving force of the narrative, instructed by the overlords, and once you hear an alternate voice E,g by me, you laugh, & dismiss it. This is how they control us and want you to behave.
this is totally incorrect. The governments want their countries to be profitable and for the economy to boom. Money is the biggest driver and hopefully one day we'll stop focusing on profit (look at some of the economic beliefs of David Attenborough about sustainable economic models). The only reason why some western governments have not gone full lockdown is because of the economy. This is the political debate between conservative and more socialist parties, that governments who are conservative want fewer restrictions so the economy isn't badly impacted. COVID is causing huge economic recessions and governments are paying out of their pockets to bail out businesses and individuals, it is not in their interest to impose restrictions because they aren't gaining any profit from it that you claim they want.
If your argument is about control and governments restricting liberty as we prepare for the new normal, what is the motive behind this assuming I've convenience you its not a monetary motive?
Also, the countries which have the highest death toll and the ones which have imposed the least restrictions. Asia has dealt with the virus so well because they are so authoritarian. New Zealand had one of the strictest lockdowns and took advantage of being an island nation. Countries like Singapore and Taiwan which are so densely populated have been strict and protected lives and done the best, and now their economics are in a much better place because they live with very few restrictions.
The problem with COVID is that for most people it is symptomless and won't be deadly, but for others, it's a nail in the coffin. Like I said in an earlier post, it's not as easy as giving people the freedom to take their own risks, because its on thing imposing restrictions on things that damage yourself, like drugs are illegal when perhaps they shouldn't be in a pure liberty sense, but with covid, giving you freedom won't just put yourself in danger, it puts others in danger... Now the argument there is educating people on the dangers of covid and letting people choose if they want to venture out and risk close contact. I know people that have lived normally since the virus, going for meals out, the gym, they really don't care and are risk-averse, I know other people that wash everything down from the mail order supermarket and won't see a single other person and locked themselves away. You are right that the vaccine is one of many, this is a coronavius, the same as a common cold.
The biggest thing in society is accepting everyone is different, but being tolerant of those differences, I'm not sitting here and telling you that you can't have an opinion on this. But I can tell you I disagree with you, just as much as you disagree with me