What was great about W:A?
-uncluttered and simple UI
-easy and quick text chatting with simple team chat, as well as personal (/me) statements and anonymous (/anon) statements
-the best ninja rope ever
-near perfect gameplay mechanics
-being able to handicap HP per team + or - while still maintaining the same number of worms

skunk3, are you being serious or just trolling the devs?

Afaik, Walrus is banned

hm
https://www.tus-wa.com/profile/TheWalrus/
Does the "watched" status mean he's banned?

Can't say I was satisfied with this game that much, but at least I still can remember its name 

it's possible to play rayman arena online through evolve

What is evolve?

oooh  rekt

.:Edit:.
[attachment=1]
SheriffBot u r coward, come back!

vague, easily abuse/ignore-able rules
*points fingers at rope shopper*

There's 2 things I want: an ability to pin/stick weapon panel like chat, and an option to hide those useless **whisper**s. If 3.8 can do that, I'm all for it.

I think I'll just quote it.

Quote from: skunk3 on April 23, 2016, 03:10 PM

13. Only one player per computer/system for online matches... which I don't see as a huge issue anyway since most people who add 2 teams are lying anyway.

Putting such a restriction is... a bad idea, to say the least.
Point 1: In W:A, teams' names in lobby share their color with teams' owner's nickname, which makes this tactic quite obvious, and therefore ineffective.
Point 2: In case of 1v1ing schemes which require a high number of worms per alliance, adding more teams per player is what people usually do.

A suggestion: put MapGEN version number into the installer file name
no guess games plz