Forums
106
Leagues Playoffs / Re: Season 37 PO discussion
« on: April 21, 2014, 11:57 AM »
So, what will happen?
Forums
May 21, 2024, 01:05 AM
News:
Leagues updated to v2.0
Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
107
Mappacks Comments / Re: Mappack #120, The Big WA Starter Pack submitted by Mablak
« on: April 16, 2014, 04:30 PM »
Same here, I can't download the map. Chrome says: "The page you are looking for is temporarily unavailable.
Please try again later.", all after like 1 minute of "Waiting to www.tus-wa.com"
Please try again later.", all after like 1 minute of "Waiting to www.tus-wa.com"
108
Leagues Playoffs / Re: Season 37 PO discussion
« on: April 15, 2014, 06:48 PM »
About clanners, I have a question.
Some p3's results were:
vs l3x: 18-7
vs TdC: 22-12
And TaG's:
vs l3x: 17-13
vs TdC: 2-0
p3 and TaG reached the 50%, so they both reached the PO.
l3x and TdC didn't reach the 50% according to the TUS rules in order to qualify to PO.
If l3x wouldn't lost 4 games, let's say 4 vs TaG or vs p3, they would reach that minimum of 50%. They had a 52-60 record, and they finished in 2d place at season ranking.
If TdC wouldn't lost 2 games, let's say 2 vs TaG or p3, they would reach that minimum of 50%. They had a 41-45 record, and they finished in 4th place at season ranking.
If p3 and TaG wouldn't beat TdC and l3x in 4 and 2 games respectively, the PO wouldn't be cancelled. So the actual PO TUS rules are saying that we had to lose against them, let's say, giving some points to help them to qualify? There was only 13 (and basically only 10 clans played more than 6 games) clans playing on this season, so it's too hard that 4 clans can reach the 50% PLUS 70 games played in a season. So, what's the point on requiring a minimum of 50%, to punish two clans that defeated too much their opponents by cancelling a PO? or forcing to the rest of clans to be better, to lose less or to search for "easy-wins" clanners? In next season, we and p3 or any other clan that want to play PO, will have to see if we NEED to lose some games or not. This rules aren't helping with the competitiveness at all.
Some p3's results were:
vs l3x: 18-7
vs TdC: 22-12
And TaG's:
vs l3x: 17-13
vs TdC: 2-0
p3 and TaG reached the 50%, so they both reached the PO.
l3x and TdC didn't reach the 50% according to the TUS rules in order to qualify to PO.
If l3x wouldn't lost 4 games, let's say 4 vs TaG or vs p3, they would reach that minimum of 50%. They had a 52-60 record, and they finished in 2d place at season ranking.
If TdC wouldn't lost 2 games, let's say 2 vs TaG or p3, they would reach that minimum of 50%. They had a 41-45 record, and they finished in 4th place at season ranking.
If p3 and TaG wouldn't beat TdC and l3x in 4 and 2 games respectively, the PO wouldn't be cancelled. So the actual PO TUS rules are saying that we had to lose against them, let's say, giving some points to help them to qualify? There was only 13 (and basically only 10 clans played more than 6 games) clans playing on this season, so it's too hard that 4 clans can reach the 50% PLUS 70 games played in a season. So, what's the point on requiring a minimum of 50%, to punish two clans that defeated too much their opponents by cancelling a PO? or forcing to the rest of clans to be better, to lose less or to search for "easy-wins" clanners? In next season, we and p3 or any other clan that want to play PO, will have to see if we NEED to lose some games or not. This rules aren't helping with the competitiveness at all.
109
TUS Discussion / Re: i'm the new cueshark! look this super sheep :(_____)
« on: April 15, 2014, 03:33 AM »
caralho!!! vn man
110
TUS Discussion / Re: WxW Scheme: baseball bat & firepunch
« on: April 09, 2014, 03:48 PM »
So, who the hell support FIREPUNCH (and Dragon Ball) on the Wxw scheme?
I reopen this thread because I can't believe that in almost 4 years nobody talk about this :0 or at least I haven't see it.
I reopen this thread because I can't believe that in almost 4 years nobody talk about this :0 or at least I haven't see it.
111
Off Topic / misspellings/fails on your language
« on: April 09, 2014, 12:14 PM »
Anyone has pics of misspellings/fails on signs, labels, tv, ads, etc, of your country, or on ur language? Like this ones (Chile):
I need someones please
I need someones please
113
Off Topic / Re: bodybuilding forum
« on: April 07, 2014, 12:46 PM »
Alright ^^ just trying to help. Keep it up mate 
114
Off Topic / Re: bodybuilding forum
« on: April 07, 2014, 02:49 AM »Not machines, but in a few months you'll need more WEIGHT than you body weight if you want to gain more strength.Look this Street workout site http://www.madbarz.com/all-routines ... i dont need any stupid machines for get more strongerwell first month i didnt do even 5 pull ups ... lo .. and i didnt been in gym i did it alone without nothing just i do it for myslef and no1 help me in itSo your just doing pull ups and pushups? Thats why you have so little progress. You need to weight train.
JUST NO GYM NO STEROIDS NOTHING xD
3 moths with diet and good workout plan...
115
Off Topic / Re: bodybuilding forum
« on: April 06, 2014, 05:23 AM »
Gj Cinek, keep working out hard, but if you have been hardcore at wo's, then try to be hardcore at kitchen aswell. Don't skip leg day
116
Leagues Games Comments / Game #167442, reported by Wolfgang
« on: April 05, 2014, 02:07 AM »
watch 10:55 of last replay
117
Leagues Games Comments / Game #167273, reported by avirex
« on: April 02, 2014, 07:52 PM »Quote
[Chelsea`p3] btw./ Ano, it was our 1st win togetherxDD! I need a compressed version of this log in order to add it to my signature
[p3`ANO] pussies everywhere
[dt`avirex] well, dont be so f@#!ing retarded
[dt`avirex] and u wont have to worry about a pussy
[p3`ANO] anorex
[p3`ANO] keep this
[Berria`p3] xD
[dt`avirex] ill stick it in ur ass ANO
[dt`avirex] ;p
[p3`ANO] give the preppy dwarf
[p3`ANO] i ll put him in yr ass
[p3`ANO] i m strong enough auhuah
[Berria`p3] dwarf
[Berria`p3] funny
[Berria`p3] 55
[dt`avirex] ok, stfu about that now
[dt`avirex] ur the pussy, you stayed ina community for over a year with somone u dont like
[dt`avirex] u wanna talk about being fake?
[dt`avirex] ur f@#!ing fake, for that
[dt`avirex] so stfu about it.. i dont wanna hear it no more
[Berria`p3] wewwewe
[p3`ANO] i never asked him to join auhauh
[Chelsea`p3] what are you talking about, Avi ? coz i wanna know too
[dt`avirex] u should have said shit a year ago, not wait a year, then cry like a pussy
[p3`ANO] dumbirex
[p3`ANO] i told you
[dt`avirex] and wanna call everyone else a pussy?
[p3`ANO] and i m not crying at all
[dt`avirex] sure the f@#! u r
[p3`ANO] i don t care about 110 cm of dry shit
[dt`avirex] then why u keep talking about him? let it go
[p3`ANO] don t need to stay with pussis
[dt`avirex] ok then, stfu
[dt`avirex] its over
[p3`ANO] f@#! off
[dt`avirex] or better yet "calm down"
[p3`ANO] don t call me
[p3`ANO] i won t answer the phone
[p3`ANO] auhauh
[dt`avirex] lol
[dt`avirex] 52 gj
dt`avirex..dt`dibzz: what was my time?
dt`dibzz..dt`avirex: 55
dt`avirex..dt`dibzz: good times.
[dt`avirex] Chelsea, this is none of ur buisnes.. fight club buisness ;p
[Berria`p3] 110 cm of dry shit
[Berria`p3] ahuauhauha
[dt`avirex] lol
[Chelsea`p3] ok, i'm sorry
119
General discussion / Re: Some funny old nostalgia logs
« on: March 29, 2014, 09:29 PM »
too hilarious!
120
Leagues Playoffs / Re: Playoff talk: Season 36
« on: March 27, 2014, 05:29 PM »Peja, my friend, this time "you are peeing out of the water-closet" as we say in Italy.jaja, we say here in Chile "cagando fuera del tiesto" (shitting out of the pot)