About clanners, I have a question.
Some p3's results were:
vs l3x: 18-7
vs TdC: 22-12
And TaG's:
vs l3x: 17-13
vs TdC: 2-0
p3 and TaG reached the 50%, so they both reached the PO.
l3x and TdC didn't reach the 50% according to the TUS rules in order to qualify to PO.
If l3x wouldn't lost 4 games, let's say 4 vs TaG or vs p3, they would reach that minimum of 50%. They had a 52-60 record, and they finished in 2d place at season ranking.
If TdC wouldn't lost 2 games, let's say 2 vs TaG or p3, they would reach that minimum of 50%. They had a 41-45 record, and they finished in 4th place at season ranking.
If p3 and TaG wouldn't beat TdC and l3x in 4 and 2 games respectively, the PO wouldn't be cancelled. So the actual PO TUS rules are saying that we had to lose against them, let's say, giving some points to help them to qualify? There was only 13 (and basically only 10 clans played more than 6 games) clans playing on this season, so it's too hard that 4 clans can reach the 50% PLUS 70 games played in a season. So, what's the point on requiring a minimum of 50%, to punish two clans that defeated too much their opponents by cancelling a PO? or forcing to the rest of clans to be better, to lose less or to search for "easy-wins" clanners? In next season, we and p3 or any other clan that want to play PO, will have to see if we NEED to lose some games or not. This rules aren't helping with the competitiveness at all.