And to think all we needed was a cookie

Ray has ordered me to give you a cookie, so here goes:

https://www.tus-wa.com/forums/complaints/regarding-ban-threads/

You're getting a warning for asking us to ban Ray, Ray

...



...

never mind!

Quote from: chakkman on October 19, 2010, 02:26 PM

Quote from: DarkOne on October 19, 2010, 02:08 PM
And believe it or not, his first post here was made with good intentions (though, as Komo pointed out, the execution could've been better)

I didn't see Husk nor NinjaCamel say "thank you for your good advice Zipp0! We really needed your help on that one!".

How is this a refutation of what I said? 

nino, what I've seen you do the past weeks isn't asking for a solution, it's trolling the forums.

Quote from: nino on October 19, 2010, 02:21 PM
then when things get calm again

When did that happen in the past?

Quote from: NinjaCamel on October 19, 2010, 02:17 PM
just calm down for a week and lets see what will happen. zippo really is trying to act better imo...

Quote from: NinjaCamel on October 19, 2010, 02:25 PM
i would say that i have been one of the biggest zippo haters and now i wanna see what will happen

Quote from: nino on October 19, 2010, 02:13 PM
lmfao D1, i dunno why u keep finding way to defend and protect him, of course, u gonna find always one way.

I don't know why you're obsessing so much over Zippo while I can only find 2(!!!!) games where both you and zippo are playing. There's really only one way Zippo could be bothering you and that's by looking up games/threads with Zippo and being offended by something he says to someone else.
Same goes for Ray: 1 game since February. ONE! And just 10 games before that in the entire 2 years of TUS.

It's bo5

Quote from: chakkman on October 19, 2010, 01:50 PM
I think you got that a bit wrong, noone asked you to change.

Except they are You can look for it, there's a good amount of posts about zippo here. And believe it or not, his first post here was made with good intentions (though, as Komo pointed out, the execution could've been better)

These are the only PM responses I got btw after I sent out reminders. I might've just sent them to people without games played, though

Quote from: Phanton
I said yes to oldsock, but he preferred to play Clann and shadow do not see him for some time ...
Dark also had that in WORMNET predicament in which we could not get into the predicament in the server room ...

Quote from: Unique
Hey,

Yes, I know! I'm in #AG every day, but I don't see them! But I will try a bit harder to arrange the matches

Made it a complaint thread This is the best to get an actual answer, NC!

https://www.tus-wa.com/forums/complaints/ninjacamel-vs-rocket-game-41663/

19:35

I'd be tempted to void this game, but I'd like to hear from some BnGers. It's not actually a sitter, but the timer is clearly way too high.

Quote from: BnG Scheme Description3 Fouls means a lose by default.- Game ending by a foul is completely void. Game must be replayed.

I'll ask Komo to post here

Perhaps it would be best if you started off with posting here next time something like this occurs, even if it's only a question, mister camel!

https://www.tus-wa.com/leagues/game-41663/

Sorry for making this take a bit longer than usual. These night shifts take it out of me.

Quote
2) Lag-outs

    * If one player lags out and returns to the given channel, the game should be continued with handicap or restarted.
    * If a player lags out and is not seen online 10 minutes later, then the game is taken care of by the following rules:
    * If it was the first game, then the game should not be reported, rather played at another time.
    * If it was the second game and the loser of the first game was seemingly losing the second game too, it can be reported. At any other occasion the moderators will decide about the outcome of the game, after it is posted to the forum's League Complaints section.
    * Moderators will never decide about the outcome of a game considering the skills of the players. Always the state of the game is what the moderators consider.

I think we can read the same for crashes etcetera. I crashed a game to see what it shows me in the replay and it shows exactly what we saw in replay 5.

Quote from: Dub-c on October 18, 2010, 03:03 PM
lol why are you minimizing in a clan game? Even I know that causes crashs.

I'll start off with this. Simply don't do this. You know crashes make awkward situations.

But considering there's always a doubt whether a game crashed or someone quit, I checked back at the complaints where lalo was involved (either by posting or because he was one of the players) and I saw no major problems, certainly no one accusing lalo of false play. Lalo was usually the voice of reason in complaints, so I think it's safe to say it was a genuine crash.

Now for the position itself. I'm not a major elite player, so of course I may have a wrong impression of the game. If an independant elite player thinks I'm talking out of my ass here, please give me your take on the game
mm had 3 worms, 2 of which were poisoned. cfc had 2 worms, but considering the turn order, the one with poor health will die the very next turn.
That leaves 1 full health worm vs 1 full health worm and 2 poisoned worms (though both had a fair amoung of health during the crash).

Clearly, mm has an advantage in health. cfc has an advantage in that it can make use of no turn order. It's going to take mm time to get his worms in the same location, during which cfc has time to damage the healthy worm and during which the sick worms lose hp. On the other hand, mm has the option of damaging cfc with kamikaze turns. Both teams still had airstrikes/napalms and a supersheep and cfc still had a dynamite. mm still had 1 rope, cfc still had 2.

I think the outcome of this game depends on which tactics are used. The longer is takes, the bigger cfc's chances of winning, the shorter is takes, the bigger mm's chances of winning, but in the end, there are too many variables to predict a definite winner. I certainly wouldn't award a win for this, though you could debate about whether there should be handicaps in a replay. I personally would vote for not having one because of the points I mentioned above.

Error 404: game does not exist

Please report it again

It's this game: https://www.tus-wa.com/leagues/game-41470/

I can't change it to hysteria though

Contrary to popular belief, I don't have a backup of RRkit

I do have a bunch of tool assisted replays by Deadcode and M3ntal, though

 
He did use the rope on his last turn.
He didn't use the rope on the turn before that, but that's cause he used shotgun.

If you read through his more recent game, you can see a trend where he's trying to avoid that sort of thing. It's not the way it's supposed to be (at least not yet), but he he's definitely trying.
I had a little chat with him on msn and he said he'll avoid this sort of chat in the future.

I'm asking people to be patient though. People don't change overnight.

Quote from: Cueshark on October 18, 2010, 12:44 PM
I'm so glad I don't play TUS competitively.  I love playing my friends and enjoying the game in a social setting.  It still can be competitive, but having fun is top of the list.

Speaking of which! It's been too long since we've had a proper sheeprace or even a roperace!