Quote from: Anubis on March 08, 2013, 05:47 PM

Quote from: Dub-c on March 08, 2013, 01:33 PM

Quote from: Anubis on March 07, 2013, 10:02 PM

Quote from: Husk on March 07, 2013, 09:20 PM

Quote from: Anubis on March 07, 2013, 01:26 AM
Here a replay about the 1v1 situation in Roper. Additional info in the chatbox at the end.

Btw I meant buffer, not puffer. XD

nr there

but I think blue lost because of that failed hiding at the 4:20 turn

But that's the whole problem, the probability for red to win is a lot higher since red can hide on top (more reachable cr8s) and blue must hope for hard cr8s for red or looses no matter what happens. It makes me feel pretty helpless as blue as my actions don't really matter (even with fd, no chance) since red will have easier cr8s and doesn't need to care about hiding at all.

I've suggested a thousand times to increase fd. Can you see why? Why would blue also not hide on top? Various maps can also help with this dilemma. I think blue lost because he was retarded.

So you suggest for the blue team to hide on top so red wins even easier? Red attacked every turn and only some harder cr8s/better hides by blue would have stopped the default win. Makes no sense for blue to hide on top because of the advantage red has from the beginning.

I would rather draw, then let red team win (unless he does 37 + damage 1st turn and plays flawlessly). You are stating a problem that does not exist yet. When this problem exists, let people find a strategy against it. To discourage it, I would increase fd, so that more skill is involved then just getting the crate and placing a mine complacently on top of the worm . I would use 2 worms, perhaps 3 worms even.  I would use a map where hiding on top would not be optimal because of fd. The main problem with all schemes is that they do not evolve and have changed very very little since the beginning. For roper in particular, the one who picks the scheme should be able to modify and play the scheme however they want (notifies opponent of changes before the game) . That is how things evolve. Not by having a ridiculous popularity contest.

Quote from: Impossible on March 08, 2013, 05:54 PM
roper is awesome scheme as a funner, but its really unbalanced as a league scheme. Honestly if not a bunch of old school players Id like to see it remove from classic

And . . . I'm done.

Quote from: Anubis on March 07, 2013, 10:02 PM

Quote from: Husk on March 07, 2013, 09:20 PM

Quote from: Anubis on March 07, 2013, 01:26 AM
Here a replay about the 1v1 situation in Roper. Additional info in the chatbox at the end.

Btw I meant buffer, not puffer. XD

nr there

but I think blue lost because of that failed hiding at the 4:20 turn

But that's the whole problem, the probability for red to win is a lot higher since red can hide on top (more reachable cr8s) and blue must hope for hard cr8s for red or looses no matter what happens. It makes me feel pretty helpless as blue as my actions don't really matter (even with fd, no chance) since red will have easier cr8s and doesn't need to care about hiding at all.

I've suggested a thousand times to increase fd. Can you see why? Why would blue also not hide on top? Various maps can also help with this dilemma. I think blue lost because he was retarded.

Thanks for challenge Franz

Quote from: Statik on January 24, 2013, 07:37 PM
I really dunno what franz will prefer, a variety of moves in my current run, or this kickpump madness in the attached replay xD

Pick the run YOU like best! I like the madness though

Nice run Wolfgang, you had a couple pumps I really liked!

5.47.WAgame5.37.WAgame8.15.WAgame

New run added. Old run attached.15.23.WAgame

I'll get the ball rolling . . . lets see some replays.

who is peja?

Quote from: avirex on December 13, 2012, 11:35 PM
wally, its not active !! lol you dont believe me?!


the only reason it says active in the past couple days is because every so often players get runged ranks for inactivity...

trust me, cases ladder has been dead for years, the only reason you see names on the cases ladder site to begin with is because the nerds payed for gold membership, and i dont think that supreme is the same supreme u guys are thinking of

Did I not just say that? lol

Quote from: TheWalrus on December 13, 2012, 11:15 PM

Quote from: DeathInFire on December 13, 2012, 11:03 PM
Dunno, the style contest is in essence good, but it requires too much man-power in my opinion. There needs to be some automation in place where people can reliable decide what was "better". Of course that is not really objectively possible since many have a different view what is style. But if it would be possible to measure distance, velocity and obstacles crossed there could be a scheme that requires tricks for maximum "points".

Also: If we already can have a portal gun it shouldn't be any harder to determine if a pump was a pump, a shadow a shadow etc.

unrelated, i was talking on fos boards about old worms 2 cases ladder, i looked at the standings, and look who is active:  http://www3.igl.net:81/perl/find.cgi?path=worms2&svr=cgi1&ser=39224&ladder=worms2
Thats not the german supreme right?  He cant still be worming all this time on worms2?  I know your one of the few people that probably remember supreme, kai.

Inactive . . . . simply has a membership. The top 20's of both ladders rotate between the few people who bought memberships. Not the same person.

Who gives a f@#!? Yall honestly have nothing better to do?

Quote from: zippeurfou on December 10, 2012, 01:45 PM
sorry to intrude in this thread but just wanted to say lol @all of this.
Do you guys even realize that you're bashing the one who made the community ?
b2b was and always will be komo's as ckc is chicken's as TdC is rash's and mine....
Would anyone from ckc dare to treat him like you guys do to komo? As anyone in TdC would dare to manage the clan without rash and mine agreement ?
A clan/community without its leader is not anymore a community. To be honest I still can't believe how you dare say b2b is yours when the creator of it disagree in eveyway how it is managed. It is not komo who should create a new community but the current b2b people who should at least rename it.
Honestly as much as I like all of you, you're deeply wrong here and you should listen to komo, at least be polite with him.
The guy thought he could give mod power to everyone which I believe is an error. Komo was too idealistic thinking everyone could come up with nice decision but fact is there are people who have to take the harsh decision that the rest wouldn't dare to take.
I know komo might has been a jerk in past, I even had a complaint against him which might be one of my only one so far but as a clan leader I really can't stand the attitude from some of his past member...
And editing other people post to make them look stupid is really out of the line. Do you think the community is not smart enough to read between the line and see when someone is being a jerk ?
Sorry to intrude in a matter that doesn't concern me but i've to admit i'm quite disapointed about some of you .
PS: komo, bng is not dead at all. Watch TdC last clanner against cfc there was not a single notch and we all enjoyed the game. It is not because some only think about winning that it's the case for all of us.

Please don't compare Chicken23 to Komo ever again, k thanks.

Quote from: l7cx1ClMY word should be enough dark since I am successful 25 year old worms vet from the 90s. . . .I'm oldschool

no