Quote from: Mablak on October 03, 2012, 03:13 AM

Quote from: Prankster on October 02, 2012, 01:12 PM
inf sg, inf tele, inf torch, no girders
shorter turn time (10-12 sec) and no hot-seat time in league games

This is a good suggestion, girders cause drama half the time I use 'em, and shotgun is always helpful for clearing land. Also, to reduce the effectiveness of notching, shorter turn time is the best method. It wouldn't eliminate it, but it would make it much more prone to error, I'd probably go even lower than 10 secs though.

Yea, maybe even lower. It was just a first idea according to a2b, where 12 is perfectly enough even with the no-repeat rules.

inf sg, inf tele, inf torch, no girders
shorter turn time (10-12 sec) and no hot-seat time in league games

This is basically a good idea and a good feature, but. Theres is a type of not-played games that shouldn't be considered pending, imo. Ie.: I have a few pending games that I weren't to play in groups stage because they wouldn't have made any difference, the same players would have advanced to the knockouts.
Also, I don't wanna play old games now, just because my former opponent needs to improve his/her percentages..

This feature needs another feature to involve activity too (by activity I mean which one of the two players tried to arrange their game and which not).

Ramone: there would be just the same questions, we would have to specify which schemes make one an all-rounder.

Also about an earlier thought of MI: I don't think a2b on TUS is a good idea. It's not just a simple BnG league with a2b rules. There's a very big amount of philosophy in it, those rules are more like guidelines, than strict and ultimate rules.. Anyway, if we can keep it invite only (and might keep the points system too), then maybe, but I personally don't really see the point..

guuria don't forget the picture!

hahahaha! are you a gardener?

Bump.

Hey, is there anyone else who liked the arcade games on TUS?

Would you like to have them back?
Maybe without highscores? It'd be a chance to make new champions! Or even new games?!

Opinions please!

Quote from: harpy on September 17, 2012, 08:02 PM
lo let me serioz but no too many not scary if u know how i look like dont upload that sheet - i,m the like KING OF TITANS AND VERRY BEAUTIFUL - BETTER MORE LIKE ALL OF HERE I,M STRONG AND NOT STUPED dx

realy name the white wolf Slavil  army lion

What kind of random text generator are you using?

Quote from: Balee on September 11, 2012, 11:33 AM

Quote from: Prankster on September 10, 2012, 11:53 PM
(...) so you brought up this aliasing thing to punish some guys you don't like (...)

I'm sorry, are you accusing FFie and me with being biased against eS? Really?

Erm. No. Why do you think so?

Quote from: Balee on September 10, 2012, 11:52 AM
Punishments only affect a handful of people. Aliasing affects the entire community.

How exactly aliasing at WO affects the entire community? Again, it doesn't give any advantage, well, except if you got paired with your own alias - but this can only happen if you use multiple nicknames.

If the problem is that multiple nicknames generate much more work, then ban and punish multiple nicknames. Or limit the number of players (yes, I know you will). Because increasing popularity does the same. But simple aliasing doesn't have to do anything with this.

I know what's really bugging you, it's the style of playing, which is kinda impossible to punish, so you brought up this aliasing thing to punish some guys you don't like, because that's forbidden at TUS leagues (at least this is what your argument implies). But seems like you did not think through why is that so. I hope I don't have to explain the Élő system. WO doesn't run anything like that, afaik.

I never knew aliasing was forbidden at WO, because I don't see any problem with it. Also I'm quite sure there were a lot aliasing before as well. If it was such a big problem, you could have clarified the punishments already before the games started.

Make it invite only, I know FFie's planning to do it. That might solve your problem. But please. If you do so, let the players know that in advance.

What's the actual problem with someone playing under a different nickname on WO? Or even multiple nicknames. As long he/she doesn't get free wins against his/her other nick, I don't see any advantages.

Also, creating new rules to hand out punishments after the game ended is incredibly childish and unfair.

Not like I care about WO, or I think that it should be played like some of my clanmates do, but these punishments are unfair. Rules should be formed before the game starts, not after. Maybe some people should think twice before preaching about manner.

Wasn't a sitter, only .12.

Anytime at your service, sir.

@ 8:31