l3x, Saturday or Sunday 19 GMT?

Semifinals

dibz (1) vs messi (5)
Sbaffo (2) vs daiNa (3)

Deadline: Friday 2016-03-11 (14 days)

Semifinals

Almog (1) vs Senator (5)
Spoon_head (2) vs MaStEr (3)

Deadline: Friday 2016-03-11 (14 days)

Mega`Adnan when can u play this?

Quote from: Ryan on February 23, 2016, 12:43 PM
I don't understand 

Look at games played on this map. He used to complain that people have practiced the maps :p

dat hypocrisy xD

It was Dead's and lales' pick and they had played your pick (T17) already. They are entitled to a free win if u can't play their pick. Dead & lales had also a good lead when pizzasheet dropped and disappeared.

The game stands. If u ever find pizzasheet and the opponents, you can finish the game and report the result.

Quote from: RIP on February 20, 2016, 11:27 AM
to the other players wanted to continue it is necessary to first remove the game or they will never be time. I know it.

And what's your and pizzasheet's motive to finish the game if it's deleted?

You could continue the game with the HPs u had (147+128 vs 114+69)

Nice lie @ 24:52 (2nd replay, fruit)

TdC vs l3x will be played when NiCo is back (next week). The deadline needs to be extended to Sunday 28th.

Your video is gone You need to tick "Archive broadcasts" checkbox from settings

Actually we didn't reach a clear consensus on this one but the games will be void. This kind of case is quite rare (2vs2 funners turned into tus games while one player wasn't monitoring the game chat). Usually a player must know he is in a 2vs2 tus game after all the AG/lobby chats.

What we learned here:

[Riaan-Marais] TUS Confirmed
[William1977] tus confirmed

I still didn't get answer to the question how would all 3 players benefit from cheating someone, though.

Quote from: Komito on February 11, 2016, 01:13 PM
By not voiding it you are creating a way for people to cheat, now that people know they can get away with this, who is to stop people from doing it? (3 out of 4 people could simply say they agreed to TUS in order to get free points).

How would all 3 cheaters get free points again? That's not irrelevant

In this case messi didn't confirm his partner is on radar and paid the price for it (he lost as many points as Walrus did).

You like examples so here is one:

You and Walrus are looking for 2vs2 tus bng on AG
I agree with VoK in PM that we will play but VoK won't say a word about tus to u
I say "wait I ask VoK" to u on AG and a moment later "ok let's do 2vs2 tus bng"
Then we lose the game and VoK says he thought it was a funner

Hands up who would have confirmed from VoK individually that he is aware he is playing tus?

This Walrus case is a bit different though and MI makes or made the final call.

Quote from: Komito on February 11, 2016, 11:17 AM
So technically I could grab 2 friends, play a funner with some newcomer who doesn't know any better, report it as TuS as long as me and the 2 other people agreed on TuS?

Then one of u would agree on losing along with a guy who has no clue he is playing a tus game. Would u be willing to play along with a such guy?

Quote from: Komito on February 11, 2016, 11:17 AM
It's THEIR fault for assuming walrus agreed, unless they can provide evidence that walrus agreed to play TuS, these games should definitely 100% be void.

Eh. messi represented team messi&Walrus. AnGsT and Degox had all the reason to assume they were playing a tus game after messi said "ye this is tus".