Ok 1st off, yeah we will have to agree to disagree because it's obvious the point he was making is many people would have a different choice, hence why I said take a vote.
And if the people I voted for didn't win the vote, but someone else did, I am sure they would have a respectable amount of votes and I would be happy to have them judge the Playoffs, it's not like it's stopping anyone from playing is it?
Who said I was letting them judge themself? I didn't? But this point you make is easily avoided, hence why I suggested a variety of judges, so they can judge each other and not themselves, there is nothing bias about respectable people we trust making decisions for us(the most successful gaming leagues and sports IRL more than usually have a commitee of "moderators" or chairmen making the decisions, people others can trust, and it works), and if people think they done a poor job, which I doubt would happen, you could re-elect other players, the reason I voted for these players is because they have more knowledge of Elite and "good players" and sportsmanship than a vast amount of wormnet.
The amount of work required isn't actually as much as what you make it seem, it takes a few minutes to flick through 3-7 pages of played games checking who they have played, If 20 players had the Playoff requirements it shouldn't even take an hour, considering how important people are making Playoffs seem, I would expect them to put in a little effort to make sure things go over smoothly and fairly.
What you have mentioned are not exactly problems are they? It's more of a dis-agreement of opinion and putting trust in other people.
Now, instead of people like avi giving me crap and smiting me just because I like to defend my ideas suggestions and opinions, why don't you take the time to realise I am trying my best here to give suggestions and ideas to help everyone out, and if you feel like you find flaws with this, just post them, with a level head, and I will reply with the same tone and try my very best to defend those accusations.
And if the people I voted for didn't win the vote, but someone else did, I am sure they would have a respectable amount of votes and I would be happy to have them judge the Playoffs, it's not like it's stopping anyone from playing is it?
Who said I was letting them judge themself? I didn't? But this point you make is easily avoided, hence why I suggested a variety of judges, so they can judge each other and not themselves, there is nothing bias about respectable people we trust making decisions for us(the most successful gaming leagues and sports IRL more than usually have a commitee of "moderators" or chairmen making the decisions, people others can trust, and it works), and if people think they done a poor job, which I doubt would happen, you could re-elect other players, the reason I voted for these players is because they have more knowledge of Elite and "good players" and sportsmanship than a vast amount of wormnet.
The amount of work required isn't actually as much as what you make it seem, it takes a few minutes to flick through 3-7 pages of played games checking who they have played, If 20 players had the Playoff requirements it shouldn't even take an hour, considering how important people are making Playoffs seem, I would expect them to put in a little effort to make sure things go over smoothly and fairly.
What you have mentioned are not exactly problems are they? It's more of a dis-agreement of opinion and putting trust in other people.
Now, instead of people like avi giving me crap and smiting me just because I like to defend my ideas suggestions and opinions, why don't you take the time to realise I am trying my best here to give suggestions and ideas to help everyone out, and if you feel like you find flaws with this, just post them, with a level head, and I will reply with the same tone and try my very best to defend those accusations.
