English
Search
Main Menu
Profile
Menu

Show posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Show posts Menu

Messages - TheKomodo

#12676
Off Topic / Re: Whats better?
July 17, 2010, 12:05 PM
Clanners

I own Chuck Norris

And Grenade are better

Synthesizers or Pianos?
#12677
I am really interested in this scheme and I will try it, but I don't think it will take over the normal scheme.

Besides it's not the scheme thats wrong with ropers, people are only being crate raped because they are using ridiculously hard maps these days, the old style maps used to never have crate rape, like the maps I host with, hard crates, although hard, are very possible to at least collect and hit with a 1s/2s grenade or something, I don't know who 1st thought of making these ridiculously tight and high maps but it's stupid, it doesn't present true skill and never will thanks to the factor of crate rape...

When people see my maps they are like "Aaah this map sucks" but lol, not it doesn't suck back in the day they would be great, my maps are perfectly created for the skilled roper, if you actually think of it, roping on my maps isn't even too easy, yeah it's easier than most peoples because it isn't practically touching the roof or the sides, but it presents true skill.

I do like your idea Avi, but I wouldn't use it to replace the current scheme and it's not the scheme thats wrong, it's the maps, anyone with common sense and has been around for longer than only 5 years will know this is right and see what I mean, even if say "I don't like Komo so I won't even listen to him", I think your scheme will be good, as a 2nd choice of roper scheme, like just to make it more interesting, but I don't know if it should count to the same Standings or make a seperate scheme of it.

People started making these silly maps because more and more people started to tap fast and think that they have advantage over someone who can't tap fast, whether you believe this to be true or not does not matter, but does not relieve the fact that i've seen players get beat that are much better, because of these maps and their unlucky crates.

Something needs to be done about this, because not just is it frustrating to lose games because of crate rape, if you think about it, it can, and does cause people to fall out, some people who are friends, sometimes start arguements with each other because of a bad game, I am not saying this will solve that, but it will help a little if the scheme is more skill based and not luck.


And I had an idea a while back and never bothered to mention it, but here it is:

Let's go back to oldschool roper maps, you all know what i'm talking about, and if you don't i'll show you, but here's the perk, people will now say, blah blah 1st shot will win, well no, if you really want it to be a fair and true game then make it so the person who gets the 1st turn does NOT collect the crate, they instead w2w and THEN attack, but then the 2nd player gets 2 crates and attacks, then it's playing normal.

I have played several ropers like this, and imo it is better than the w2 rope scheme.


#12678
Leagues General / Re: wxw scheme
July 16, 2010, 08:55 PM
Quote from: Camperz on July 16, 2010, 08:15 PM
Quote from: guaton on July 16, 2010, 08:11 PM
ah omg

leave it like it is , the luck gives flavor to this game ...

its like adding machines to football , so the referee's mistakes could be avoided , lol ... would lose the essence of what football is

the game would become more monotonous and boring

if u wanna play without luck , dumbiej ( hard to do) , just play ttrr , elite and bng , and tell me how funny u will find this game




Agreed.


EDIT: Actually, LUCK is in all,
Luck is on the winds of BnG
Luck is on the hard moves of Elite
Luck is on the hard tricks of rr

Nah man, there is no luck in BnG, even when you get nice wind, you still have to be good enough to hit with it, if you are smart enough you can hide where it's hard to be hit when even wind, grenades are far more useful than wind, so is it luck that you can use grenades?

If I get no wind 5 times in a game, yeah I will probably use it, but then again, without this wind i'd probably still hit anyway, so how is that lucky? lol


Anyway yeah Nail, I understand and yeah you are right, it DOES suck when you play perfect, but lose because of bad crates and you obviously roped better than your opponent.
#12679
Leagues General / Re: wxw scheme
July 16, 2010, 07:19 PM
Also Nail I have played games where I have hit EVERY shot perfect, and had like FD on few shots so I am about 30hp ahead, both have like 40hp left, my turn, impossible crate, next turn, crate lands next to me so now I lose...

So many times... And so many people have had this too lol.
#12680
Leagues General / Re: wxw scheme
July 16, 2010, 07:11 PM
Quote from: NAiL on July 16, 2010, 06:04 PM
Crate luck is FAR more relevant to roper than it is to any other scheme that revolves around collecting weapon crates, and even still its extremely RARE that a game is ever lost soley because of the weapons you collected, or the crate luck you had in a roper.

You are so wrong lol, the amount of ropers lost because of 1 team getting harder crates is ridiculous, hence why I always host with maps that don't fill most of the map area, that are ridiculously high, and ridiculously tight at the sides, so that in term even with hard crates, it's always possible to get crate and hit if you are good enough.
#12681
Leagues General / Re: wxw scheme
July 16, 2010, 04:47 PM
Quote from: chakkman on July 16, 2010, 04:20 PM
Quote from: Komo on July 16, 2010, 10:33 AM
Quite alot of people still use FB shopper and wxw scheme, as do I and it's pretty decent, but seeing as FB and TuS only schemes I used for league matches in these schemes I don't really have a valid opinion, but alot of people seem to like the FB schemes for Shopper/WxW.

Either that, or just put the crate drop ratio down on the worse items? I don't know lol, but I agree that the crates are kinda weird, I got 4 prods in a TuS shopper once, and like lots of bows.

FB shoppa scheme has a lot of super weapons actually... i usually delete them from the scheme which makes it quite ok for me. I guess if TUS would tweak the FB schemes a bit and take them people would be happier with those all in all.

I would REALLY appreciate if you took the Team17 FB scheme at least, TUS one, excuse me, sucks hard.

The super weapons is what makes it good lol, some super weapons and some of the low power boring weapons, a good mix is perfect
#12682
Leagues General / Re: wxw scheme
July 16, 2010, 11:49 AM
Quote from: Ray on July 16, 2010, 11:00 AM
Quote from: MonkeyIsland on July 16, 2010, 04:21 AM
Why don't you offer a 'balanced' scheme and we shall update? :)
Monkey, the community is not always the solution! Have some balls and do what avirex said. Put a good staff together - as avirex said (thumbs up) - including reputable wormers, arrange a meeting on MSN/Skype/IRC, it doesn't matter, just make sure it has group talk. Then these people should discuss what to do with the scheme, then make it and then upload it. Work is done, everyone is happy.

You could also use that meeting to discuss other things?
#12683
Leagues General / Re: wxw scheme
July 16, 2010, 10:33 AM
Quite alot of people still use FB shopper and wxw scheme, as do I and it's pretty decent, but seeing as FB and TuS only schemes I used for league matches in these schemes I don't really have a valid opinion, but alot of people seem to like the FB schemes for Shopper/WxW.

Either that, or just put the crate drop ratio down on the worse items? I don't know lol, but I agree that the crates are kinda weird, I got 4 prods in a TuS shopper once, and like lots of bows.
#12684
Off Topic / Re: DRAGON OF KOMODO HAHAHAHAHA
July 16, 2010, 10:17 AM
Lol nino, everything is relative !!!
#12685
1st of all, a big thanks for EVERYONE who took part.

Sorry I had to leave halfway through, my mates were desperate to get me out to the pub, so I ended up going thanks to darKz finishing hosting the tournament for me, so a big thanks to darKz for finishing up, appreciated mate :)


Here are the results:

1st - wormf00d
2nd - darKz
3rd - Dead
4th - OoO

And here are the fixtures:  (The numbers represent the order they won their games)

1st round:

prankster vs Gonzo    /  Prankster wins   4
darKz vs Skunk3    / darKz wins   5
wormf00d vs ShyGuy   /  wormf00d wins  2
obscure vs lacoste    /  lacoste wins  3
FX vs DarkOne    /  FX  wins  6
Knight vs Campz    /  Knight  wins 1
KRD vs OoO    /  OoO wins  8
AngSt vs Dead    /  Dead   wins 7


Quarter Finals:

Knight vs darKz    /  darKz wins  2
wormf00d vs FX    / wormf00d wins  1
lacoste vs Dead    /   Dead wins  4
Prankster vs OoO    / OoO wins  3



Semi Finals:

wormf00d vs OoO    /  wormf00d wins
darKz vs  Dead    /  darKz wins


Final:

wormf00d vs darKz    /  wormf00d wins


3rd Place Decider:

OoO vs Dead    /  Dead wins

Again, thanks to everyone for taking part Smiley

Same time next week, hope to see you all again and more Smiley

Thanks, Komo.


*Edit* - Could someone who has the Final replay please attach it to this thread, thanks.

*Another edit* - And here's the replay :)
#12686
Nice lol
#12687
*bump*

It's tonight 7:30pm GMT - Party Time
#12688
Leagues Playoffs / Re: Clanners messed up 2
July 15, 2010, 09:18 AM
80 is fine, thank you MI and I hope everyone enjoys it.
#12689
Leagues Playoffs / Re: Clanners messed up 2
July 14, 2010, 10:20 PM
Wtf Chick, you said to me 60/70 wasn't enough...
#12690
Leagues Playoffs / Re: Clanners messed up 2
July 14, 2010, 09:51 PM
Quote from: beer on July 14, 2010, 09:48 PM
ill not do offtopic and show how cool and skilled I am.

just play us when we ask, thats the way to have 100 games played for season

Dude, seriously, 1st time i've said no to clan you ! i'm just having a day off from clanners because I played like 14 hours clanning yesterday... lol

We will play next time or something...

Anyway, WHO ELSE thinks 100 games? lol