4
« on: August 09, 2015, 12:57 PM »
I know it might be a discussion forced and very critical, but I feel the need to talk about it in a site where there are many players of worms and this seems like the right place.
Also this year I played the worm olympics and although I am a player of medium \ low level I noticed, first of all, the decline that these Olympics have taken over the years, as the number of players, but this is justifiable.
Rather, the moderation of worms olympics allows too many noob schemes hosted and played by some players, and he doesn't attach much importance to the most important schemes that made the history of this game: schemes that have more quality.
This is not right for me and I complain of poor moderation of these Olympics: little reciprocity, many individualism.
I'm glad to know what you think, thank you; (and sorry for possible grammatic errors.