I mean, that might should choose two picks before the game. Because there is still such a situation, that we play our first pick, others say, for example, Roper, later changing to wxw etc., simply set the two picks ahead of the two games I think it would be ok?

Most of the time there's no point to that. If you don't wanna play the scheme they pick after, you're an avoider.. So you'll just have to accept it.
But yeah, can't bargain for a better pick after you've already done your own fav one. 

i always ask opponents pick also before my pick, if they dont say it, camelo wont light. its bullshit to change the pick after the first game when they can choose the scheme which fits better after lose or win.

ah.. guess name of topic is "my dick - your dick"

Not like I care, but.. What's the problem with picking their scheme only after you played your pick? Some points might change after the first game, so if you care about that, you would analyze only after. That's prudence, not bullshit.

much time i must say my pick, and hear, we decide after etc

fair = we say our they our  before the game

after not change

Quote from: NinjaCamel on February 22, 2012, 04:16 PM
i always ask opponents pick also before my pick, if they dont say it, camelo wont light. its bullshit to change the pick after the first game when they can choose the scheme which fits better after lose or win.

me too

I much prefer picking before both the first game starts.

Quote from: Chicken23 on April 06, 2012, 09:55 AM

Quote from: NinjaCamel on February 22, 2012, 04:16 PM
i always ask opponents pick also before my pick, if they dont say it, camelo wont light. its bullshit to change the pick after the first game when they can choose the scheme which fits better after lose or win.

me too

I much prefer picking before both the first game starts.

me too.it is unfair wen you join n your oponent tells you last moment his pick but you allredy started