Quote from: MonkeyIsland on January 11, 2014, 06:16 AM


Lukz quit (and Bry4N after) without having Aef's agreement or even giving them a chance to consider which makes this disagreement in favor of Aef. You just can't quit whenever you want. You could at least talk in the game and do not fire any shots in your turn until you reach a decision. What TaG did was hasty.
But that's not punishable by costing them the final game of PO which not everyone got even their first shot.

nope but i can read

then, MI

why they can regroup? in the moment that u said "Lukz with -21hp damage" i understand that this is a rematch with handicap and not a new game

this all happens because they dont let me play
otherwise this would be over 

jk i cant even play intermediate now

Quote from: MonkeyIsland on January 11, 2014, 06:16 AM
The left side of the map was a bit weaker and that couldn't be spotted before the game unless Aef would show png version of the map in the lobby.

TaG spotted it though, before the game, as my lobby log shows. They wouldn't have quit if they had come to tele on the good side. Do you think TaG would let us quit if we ended up left? I don't think so.

QuotePlease rematch this game having Lukz with -21hp damage. Aef can regroup for this game.

Will be hard to put -21, but I guess it can be done.

@Lukz: doesnt matter if we regroup or not. Bar left, so did kyho/swist. That doesn't leave many other options than just Pej & Impo again. Regroup would only be advantageous to AeF if they get to pick an entire new scheme, which isn't what MI supports right?

rofl hhc, play that bng with chelsea

really u guys can't keep quiet xD

then, MI

why they can regroup? in the moment that u said "Lukz with -21hp damage" i understand that this is a rematch with handicap and not a new game

too, obviously we start if we apply handicap, not?

@Lukz,
-21hp is not an advantage for Aef and the first shot of the new game must start with TaG. Aef's is having an advantage on this complaint, that's why I'm giving them the chance to regroup.

@HHC,
It's really bad luck to lose your members at this time, but I don't think we can do something about that. Changing scheme requires both sides to have an agreement but you couldn't reach one in the first place.

I'll let Peja deal with this from now. I quit and so did Chelsea today. AeF can still play it, but with half the clan gone it'll be a tough nut to crack for them. Just wish we could have re-played this sooner.

Since when a bng map has to be fair on both side ? I remember loosing lot of bng because of that and the rule: light mean ok. I thought that if I had started I would gain advantage so that was part of the "risk" by lighting up (and also because I didn't know before game start that one side was better than the other as all bng map).
Next time, if it turns out I don't get best hide, I guess I'll just leave and link to this topic .

Thought the same, fada. 

Quote from: MonkeyIsland on January 11, 2014, 08:17 PM
@Lukz,
-21hp is not an advantage for Aef and the first shot of the new game must start with TaG. Aef's is having an advantage on this complaint, that's why I'm giving them the chance to regroup.

@HHC,
It's really bad luck to lose your members at this time, but I don't think we can do something about that. Changing scheme requires both sides to have an agreement but you couldn't reach one in the first place.

ok

days aef?