Started by Senator, December 15, 2018, 08:10 PM
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Quote from: TheKomodo on December 15, 2018, 08:27 PMDid it not used to be 8 players in PO?
Quote from: XanKriegor on November 18, 2015, 03:21 PMAdnan, you are Mega, not Micro and not even faint So fight till the end please.
Quote from: Rogi on January 02, 2019, 06:52 PMwhat about clanner po's? What the point we played so many games and can't have some final tourney CW's. I dont rly get it.
Quote from: Chicken23 on January 10, 2019, 09:29 PMQuote from: Rogi on January 02, 2019, 06:52 PMwhat about clanner po's? What the point we played so many games and can't have some final tourney CW's. I dont rly get it.sX should play TdC, both got over 20 games and a 50% win ratio. in my opinion.
Quote from: Senator on January 13, 2019, 07:14 PMQuote from: Chicken23 on January 10, 2019, 09:29 PMQuote from: Rogi on January 02, 2019, 06:52 PMwhat about clanner po's? What the point we played so many games and can't have some final tourney CW's. I dont rly get it.sX should play TdC, both got over 20 games and a 50% win ratio. in my opinion.not sure what the issue is with having a final for those two clans? easier PO qualifications may help motivate clans into playing again.20 games min requirement, 50% winning ratio, if 4 clans its semis and final, if 3 clans its a bye for first place to final and 2nd and 3rd do a semi?think about the people, not the live by the code (MI can always fix that later :p)You guys played 24 games.. TUS system doesn't support 2 clan playoffs and MI sets up playoffs only when there's 4 candidates. This time we don't have enough candidates. Pn with 61 games and 44% would be ok. HCP has over 50% winning ratio but they didn't care to play even 20 games (missing 25% of games) so I don't know...