Forums
May 09, 2024, 05:27 PM

Author Topic: [SOLVED] 34394 t17 vs doh  (Read 4902 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Re: 34394 t17 vs doh
« Reply #15 on: July 19, 2010, 08:08 PM »
"everyone knows chicken dont have some tool to boot people lmfao.. "

that's the reason also - why chicken used it with knowing people will think so..
btw it wasn't a crash,all know that,the replay shows that, and smok and dibz know that, and other ckc know that, cus they saw in msn im on, but yee they didn't pm me what happened ofcourse

Offline sm0k

Re: 34394 t17 vs doh
« Reply #16 on: July 19, 2010, 08:08 PM »
lucky games ofc xD btw avi , did someone tell u that ur comments are pretty useless ;p

Offline TheKomodo

Re: 34394 t17 vs doh
« Reply #17 on: July 19, 2010, 08:09 PM »
Crash, you lagout and crash all the time, more than others i've seen, so don't start accusing people of things this serious, without proof.

You are just being pretty pathetic and you know it.

Offline TheKomodo

Re: 34394 t17 vs doh
« Reply #18 on: July 19, 2010, 08:11 PM »
And if we lose 4-0 why didn't he do it the 1st 3 games?

Exactly...

Offline ZiPpO

Re: 34394 t17 vs doh
« Reply #19 on: July 19, 2010, 08:44 PM »
guys....is 35-34 for u guys!

in clanners...

i count it now!!

we got 3 members...

in almost all times we got only 2 members...me and crash...

we can play more 2 games now...and change it for our side haha!

btw 3 or 4 doh's > ckc 15 millions of ckc's!

Offline sm0k

Re: 34394 t17 vs doh
« Reply #20 on: July 19, 2010, 09:05 PM »
actuelly 5 doh s  as far i know
zippy , crash , dibz , alias and me xD

Re: 34394 t17 vs doh
« Reply #21 on: July 19, 2010, 09:06 PM »
And if we lose 4-0 why didn't he do it the 1st 3 games?

Exactly...

nah komo,
trust me I didn't crash that time, i was all time on msn, why ckc didn't check it? they did, they have me on msn and they seen me ON!
so don't be cheaters now and say it you damn did pff
if I crashed = msn auto logs out, u know that?

Re: 34394 t17 vs doh
« Reply #22 on: July 19, 2010, 09:52 PM »
Is it possible to crash only inside the game, without affecting someone's connection? This would explain why Crash stayed online.

Offline nino

Re: 34394 t17 vs doh
« Reply #23 on: July 19, 2010, 10:22 PM »
lol look for his nick..any doubt he did?
You Are Losing Time Reading my Signature.

Offline darKz

Re: 34394 t17 vs doh
« Reply #24 on: July 19, 2010, 10:40 PM »
Dulek, it is. When I have my 24h disconnect I usually lag out from games, but stay on at messengers, voice chat and other stuff because the disconnect is just that short.

Other than that I can only laugh at Crash for this funny assumption. Don't jump to conclusions man. :D
I remember knowing who it was but dont remember exactly what I knew
~ Dubc 2010

Offline nino

Re: 34394 t17 vs doh
« Reply #25 on: July 19, 2010, 10:46 PM »
ye deco used to disconnect the network cable for seconds a lot to dont lose to me some elites, and that puto always came on msn saying "wtf happened" lol , as if i didnot know him lol
You Are Losing Time Reading my Signature.

Offline Free

Re: 34394 t17 vs doh
« Reply #26 on: July 19, 2010, 10:52 PM »
What a bunch of lame shit doh...

Kicking tool, lol.

Offline Agneau

Re: 34394 t17 vs doh
« Reply #27 on: July 19, 2010, 10:59 PM »
i'll buy this kicking tool on internet but seems i will waste euros for something which doesnt even exist :d

Offline Guaton

Re: 34394 t17 vs doh
« Reply #28 on: July 19, 2010, 11:39 PM »
i'll buy this kicking tool on internet but seems i will waste euros for something which doesnt even exist :d

HOHOH XDDDDDDDD



Re: 34394 t17 vs doh
« Reply #29 on: July 19, 2010, 11:48 PM »
Crash, your claim is just ridiculous, try to have a little more respect for your opponents. And dibz / smokz, you should know by now that going along with his thinking will usually mean you're wrong.

The only way there could be any evidence for this sort of thing is if the behavior happened repeatedly. If you want to accuse someone with no evidence, then you're also accepting that in the same situation, it would be alright for someone to accuse you with no evidence.