[SOLVED] https://www.tus-wa.com/leagues/game-128254/

[Devilage]

its like talking to a brick wall..

yeah, ur best friend in jail along with soap.

[avirex]

maybe instead of making lame jokes, that no1 thinks are funny, that you have repeated so many times it wouldnt be funny at this point either way....


you should work on getting that game completed, because times-a-tickin

[MonkeyIsland]

I can't believe you guys. You argue over a map. I watched the main two replays, watched Statik's replays, read games comments and read 4 pages of complaint, for what exactly? You guys are old schools FFS! Can't you deal with a damn map yourselves?

Congratulations, you found a hole in rules! The map pick is scheme-based. The agreement-talk in the rules is concerned about the scheme. There's no rule saying what should happen to the map if there are drops in the agreed scheme. But it seems to me that if the 8 years old kids couldn't reach an agreement then the default one must be applied, meaning the very first map that had the agreement must get played over and over.

avirex, There's no rule saying you can report a free win on such disagreements. If there's a disagreement, you call the mods. Therefore your report is deleted. Your warning is raised due to insulting.
Devilage, your warning is also raised for your attitude (shocking!), I don't think I need to explain why.

I'd like to point out that franz was right on his call. Such games must be rematched. These stuff happens, be a grown up and cut each other some slack.

At this point by reading this novel, l3x's report stands because:

• In the second replay, the game is much in favor of l3x. 4 worms for l3x and 2 worms for mm (one is skunked too).
• At this point Statik drops for the second time, that makes things even more in favor of l3x.

I'll have a talk with the mods to update the rules on this matter.  Might as well add what's the deal if UFO's come and interrupt the game.

[Peja]

so basicly people get rewarded if they refuse to play on a new map after a drop? you seriously wonder about drama when drama gets rewarded with a free win? with a general straight order to rematch in such situations players maybe wont try to find loopholes or try their luck with dirty reports. would make less sense to create drama when you know u cant change a shit with it.

[Prankster]

I think I would have asked for a new map too. They started two games on the first map (with minor changes tho). One of them was short, but what if luck would have turned out opposite to the second game (don't forget, it was the team who was in advance in 2nd game dropped both times)? I think it's kinda understandable to request a new map. However, since it's down to this situation, I would do that same as franz suggested. Why make an advantage to anyone here?

[Statik]

gj l3x, you've won this game for sure!

[DioZ]

I think this rule is only good if the map is awful because of the hides or placments then i would agree but every player has the right to chose what kind of maps he wants to play in his pick...

But i get the point i think that would be a good rule to use if you rape a map like 5 times every time you play vs that player then you can say could you change the map ffs...