The Ultimate Site of Worms Armageddon

Leagues => Leagues General => Topic started by: Korydex on January 25, 2017, 03:53 PM

Title: should hysteria be moved to the free league?
Post by: Korydex on January 25, 2017, 03:53 PM
so Senator asked me to open this poll. you know you want it!
Title: Re: should hysteria be moved to the free league?
Post by: TheKomodo on January 25, 2017, 04:07 PM
Fk that I'm gone if it does.
Title: Re: should hysteria be moved to the free league?
Post by: Kradie on January 25, 2017, 04:08 PM
It's time to add ZaR to the free league.
Title: Re: should hysteria be moved to the free league?
Post by: Chelsea on January 25, 2017, 04:18 PM
In clasic league shoild be ony 5 schemes: shoppa, team17, hysteria, elite and bng!  8)
Title: Re: should hysteria be moved to the free league?
Post by: XanKriegor on January 25, 2017, 04:38 PM
You all have HAL btw.
Title: Re: should hysteria be moved to the free league?
Post by: spleen17 on January 25, 2017, 04:43 PM
It's time to add ZaR to the classic league.

Fixed
Title: Re: should hysteria be moved to the free league?
Post by: TheKomodo on January 25, 2017, 04:44 PM
The great thing about Classic, every single scheme is competitive, period.

You have to remember, this is a casual game 1st, League 2nd, if you make it full of schemes that are all ridiculously hard to compete in you are gonna push newcomers away, perhaps like the current state of TTRR the same 5-10 people playing on the same tight boring maps? You don't see us crying to remove TTRR.

There is something for everyone default and rope :)
Title: Re: should hysteria be moved to the free league?
Post by: Mega`Adnan on January 25, 2017, 05:04 PM
.....You don't see us crying to remove TTRR.

+1
Title: Re: should hysteria be moved to the free league?
Post by: TheWalrus on January 25, 2017, 06:00 PM
haha this bullshit again
Title: Re: should hysteria be moved to the free league?
Post by: Gabriel on January 25, 2017, 07:22 PM
haha this bullshit again
Title: Re: should hysteria be moved to the free league?
Post by: AduN on January 25, 2017, 08:14 PM
i vote yes because simply i dont like hysteria.
Title: Re: should hysteria be moved to the free league?
Post by: h3oCharles on January 25, 2017, 09:10 PM
haha this bullshit again
That

What is the problem with hyst again? You're salty 'cause ppl are abusing quick SD tactics? Sorry, but that's part of the game, so deal with it, bitch!

Also, feel free to talk about hysteria in a more technical way HERE (https://www.tus-wa.com/forums/worms-armageddon/standard-scheme-variants-(part-1-competitive-ground-schemes)-25170/)
Title: Re: should hysteria be moved to the free league?
Post by: TheKomodo on January 25, 2017, 09:17 PM
i vote yes because simply i dont like hysteria.

Why stop there? Just throw your computer in the bin.

Why stop there? Go find your own planet to live on and do the hell what you want.
Title: Re: should hysteria be moved to the free league?
Post by: Gabriel on January 25, 2017, 09:23 PM
i vote yes because simply i dont like hysteria.

Why stop there? Just throw your computer in the bin.

Why stop there? Go find your own planet to live on and do the hell what you want.

Why stop there?

Just throw the whole classic league in the bin
Title: Re: should hysteria be moved to the free league?
Post by: TheKomodo on January 25, 2017, 09:59 PM
Why stop there? Let's assasinate Donald Trump!!!!! IT'S HIS FAULT!!!!!
Title: Re: should hysteria be moved to the free league?
Post by: Triad on January 25, 2017, 11:32 PM
Why stop there? Disregard capitalist classic league as the prevailing ideology of bourgeois and embrace the people's free league. GIVE COMMUNISM ONE MORE TRY.

(https://media.giphy.com/media/axMy0g9z9khZC/giphy.gif)

(https://media.tenor.co/images/024d78605b3a2a743a43f270bedf4591/raw)
Title: Re: should hysteria be moved to the free league?
Post by: avirex on January 26, 2017, 02:08 AM
here are some reason why it should not be in classic.

1) its not a 'classic' scheme... like roper, shoppa, elite, t17, bng  (imo those are the classic schemes, and others should not be in classic.. but thats just my opinion)
2) it was invented for fun, and a laugh between mates... how it got so popular, and even introduced to league is shocking.
3) there are many flaws in the scheme, that should/could be fixed to make it a better "league" worthy scheme.
4) its the easier scheme to learn, newbs can become pros with in a week.. thats not really "classic" league worthy imo.

here are some reason why it should...

1) it has been in tus classic for far too long to remove it now, and more then half the community enjoys the scheme.

i think that trumps all of the reasons to remove it, imo. (as much as it is painful to say that)

but, i do believe the scheme should be updated.... the scheme was invented for fun, not for league... if thats not convincing enough that the scheme needs to be tweaked to be league worthy, then nothing will... and this is just another classic case of w:a never accepting any change.
Title: Re: should hysteria be moved to the free league?
Post by: tita on January 26, 2017, 02:33 AM
i VOTE yes!!! HYSTERIA ISN'T CLASSIC!!!


My rola is on the table
Title: Re: should hysteria be moved to the free league?
Post by: TheKomodo on January 26, 2017, 03:42 AM
here are some reason why it should not be in classic.

1) its not a 'classic' scheme... like roper, shoppa, elite, t17, bng  (imo those are the classic schemes, and others should not be in classic.. but thats just my opinion)

Well, Hysteria would be considered Classic now, think about when TUS was invented(7? 8 years ago?) Hysteria has existed since then, even before, being played competitively, and it's grown to be extremely popular/competitive today.

I'd consider Roper/Elite/BnG as vintage, those are the schemes that have truly stood the test of time.

Not only that, i'd consider Bungee racing "Classic" as well, so to be honest "Classic" is the wrong word for the League in my opinion.


2) it was invented for fun, and a laugh between mates... how it got so popular, and even introduced to league is shocking.

WA was invented for fun, and a laugh between mates, it was introduced to leagues because it's ridiculously fun & competitive.

3) there are many flaws in the scheme, that should/could be fixed to make it a better "league" worthy scheme.

I see no flaws, just a bunch of possible events that some people don't like, such as killing your own worms to get turn advantage, and telecide, which is easily comparable to using kamikaze in Elite? It's the same thing in my book.

Every single flaw ANYONE has ever said about Hysteria can be compared to similar events in other "Classic" schemes.,

It isn't surprising that most people who don't like Hysteria, also don't like BnG(I know that some players who don't like Hysteria, actually love BnG though).

4) its the easier scheme to learn, newbs can become pros with in a week.. thats not really "classic" league worthy imo.

Bullsh*t, BnG / Shopper are the easiest.
Title: Re: should hysteria be moved to the free league?
Post by: lalo on January 26, 2017, 04:27 AM
Seriously? Hyst shouldn't belong to classic, the only reason it has been added it's because it's extremely noob friendly and this league has a good amount of mediocre/lazy players. Absolutely everyone can play it in days, unlike Shopper which makes you rope and it can be pretty tough for begginers and trust me it took me months to play shopper decently in my early days.
Hyst has little room for any advanced tactic/strategy, it's a scheme for lazy people without any desire to become a real good player and that's why we see players focused in other lucky/easy schemes such as t17 and shopper. Any beginner can learn how to play those schemes, avoid as much as possible to get a good spot in PO and win it flipping a coin. All the years learning how to master your roping, learning elite tactics and throwing the perfect nades in bng become pointless if the other opponent picks first.

Bng is easier to learn? LOL, I must be missing something because I don't see any random noob hosting it very often. I only see Shopper/hyst.

How many hyst players became famous and respected for their skills and mastering this particular scheme? Gabriel and Casso maybe? I see a huge difference between them and others wich took the hard way like Dario, Daina, Mablak, Ryan, yourself Dave, Random and many more.

I don't really expect it to be removed though or even improve it (e.g. moles). Nobody likes the hard way.
Title: Re: should hysteria be moved to the free league?
Post by: TheKomodo on January 26, 2017, 05:44 AM
Seriously? Hyst shouldn't belong to classic, the only reason it has been added it's because it's extremely noob friendly and this league has a good amount of mediocre/lazy players.

Hysteria was added to Classic for many reasons:

It's competitive
It's fun
It's fast paced
It's noob friendly and pro friendly
It's interesting to watch nice shots and tactics play out

I could say the exact same thing using the exact same words you used with "Shopper".

Absolutely everyone can play it in days, unlike Shopper which makes you rope and it can be pretty tough for begginers and trust me it took me months to play shopper decently in my early days.

Absolutely everyone can play absolutely everything, maybe for you it was harder to learn rope, for me learning Rope was easier than learning BnG.

Hyst has little room for any advanced tactic/strategy, it's a scheme for lazy people without any desire to become a real good player and that's why we see players focused in other lucky/easy schemes such as t17 and shopper.

Hysteria has more tactics/strategy than BnG, that's a fact.

Why are you even using the term "lazy"? It takes no more or less effort to play Hysteria than BnG or Team17 or Elite etc...

YOUR opinion is that it is for lazy people, when facts actually point out people enjoy Hysteria for reasons including pulling off nice shots, outwitting opponent in SD, the fact that it's fast paced and you don't have to wait long between turns, etc...

You are becoming so elitist and close minded these days you are missing out on more fun, you are limiting your own gaming experience, think about that, it's something I learned a while ago when I used to hate/disrespect Elite/Team17 in the same way you guys are being ridiculous about Hysteria.

Any beginner can learn how to play those schemes, avoid as much as possible to get a good spot in PO and win it flipping a coin. All the years learning how to master your roping, learning elite tactics and throwing the perfect nades in bng become pointless if the other opponent picks first.

Any beginner can play any scheme, nobody gets awesome over night at Hysteria or Team17 or Shopper or Elite or TTRR, but they can sure as hell finish a game within 1 day of practising - ANY F**KING SCHEME.

What about poker? Anyone can learn how to play this within 1 hour, does that make it for noobs? Does that make it any less professional or competitive?

Again, you are being close minded, and limiting your own experience.
Title: Re: should hysteria be moved to the free league?
Post by: Mega`Adnan on January 26, 2017, 07:50 AM
haha this bullshit again
That

What is the problem with hyst again? You're salty 'cause ppl are abusing quick SD tactics? Sorry, but that's part of the game, so deal with it, bitch!


I agree with you Kappa!
Title: Re: should hysteria be moved to the free league?
Post by: Ryan on January 26, 2017, 08:08 AM
Would hysteria be more competitive with worm placement?

As it stands there is clearly a divide when debating if it is "classic" worthy.
Title: Re: should hysteria be moved to the free league?
Post by: rU` on January 26, 2017, 09:02 AM
Thought it was a bump from a 2009 thread when I first saw the tittle.

ps.: idk
Title: Re: should hysteria be moved to the free league?
Post by: Senator on January 26, 2017, 09:30 AM
The league should be made satisfying for those players who play the league seriously because they are the ones who keep the league alive. It's a weird approach to think only about casual players / newcomers and force competitors to adapt. Competitors care more about the league and they will vote with their feet if needed. I think most of the top players would prefer a league without Hysteria so let's ask them and if the majority wants, we can start a new league without Hysteria (here or somewhere else). Newcomers are not pushed away, they are pushed to pick Shopper :P

Various things could be differently
- The rating system rewards for noob bashing (new players have 1000 points although their real level can be 700)
- There's no break between seasons. Some players want to have a break and when they come back, they struggle to get the required 80 games done. Even one week break between seasons would help.
- The playoff system supports only 8 players (could be up to 12 players to encourage more players to compete). At the moment we don't have even 8 players, though :D And the system doesn't support playoffs with 6 players or 3 clans, for example.
- Some schemes could be updated (Shopper & T17 have stupid crate probabilities, Roper has a significant first turn advantage)
- Roper and WxW could have shared points like in the disabled allround league. Currently you get 2 x points for playing basically the same scheme.
- Prize money to bring some extra (if 10 people donate just 10$ per season, we would already have 100$ pot)
Title: Re: should hysteria be moved to the free league?
Post by: Hurz on January 26, 2017, 10:05 AM
What about poker? Anyone can learn how to play this within 1 hour, does that make it for noobs? Does that make it any less professional or competitive?

totally
Title: Re: should hysteria be moved to the free league?
Post by: Free on January 26, 2017, 11:32 AM
BAN HYSTERIA FROM CLASSIC LEAGUE!!

+ what senator said, lets actually listen to those who play leagues
Title: Re: should hysteria be moved to the free league?
Post by: TheKomodo on January 26, 2017, 12:27 PM
Senator, Free, if you had your way this League would die.

You are being unbelievably selfish.

I don't even care you don't like Hysteria it just annoys me you don't understand the definition of "competitive" in the English dictionary.

Title: Re: should hysteria be moved to the free league?
Post by: VoK on January 26, 2017, 01:19 PM
Yes iff we remove rr  to. 
Title: Re: should hysteria be moved to the free league?
Post by: Kradie on January 26, 2017, 02:32 PM
I like Hysteria, it's easy & fast paced. I find myself learning bazooka and grenade shots easier that way.

BnG is more skill based, you have more time to adjust to a desirable shot.
BnG can be tedious for beginners because of turn time & lack of movement.
BnG has too many rules implemented, it's not easy to follow them.
And finally, maps can be uneven on both sides leading to advantages (Unless if you have mirrored map).

Hysteria on the other hand, does not suffer from this. It's straightforward , kill or be killed.

I still think we need a pro and novice league & drop the rest. That is all.
Title: Re: should hysteria be moved to the free league?
Post by: lalo on January 26, 2017, 02:41 PM
Lol now I'm close minded, I am not the one who thinks is always right. You are correct though, I'm a purist and it's shocking to me you can't see the huge difference between mastering wxw and hyst for example.
The league is already dying and we have let beginners have many choices to play what they want. They are not pushed to become good allrounders anymore. So please tell me how many good allrounders were born in the last 5 years? Ren because he's pushed by other allrounder latinos and Sbaffo.
Title: Re: should hysteria be moved to the free league?
Post by: Tomi on January 26, 2017, 02:52 PM
Hm, this is true, some people can live fine with "mastering" hyst, shopp and t17 and they will never try to rope, coz it's not needed.
Title: Re: should hysteria be moved to the free league?
Post by: Kradie on January 26, 2017, 03:10 PM
Indeed. There's no need for master degree for each scheme. Play the ones you like, that's it.

That's for e.g I haven't bothered to master every single thing in Worms.
Title: Re: should hysteria be moved to the free league?
Post by: TheKomodo on January 26, 2017, 03:29 PM
Lol now I'm close minded, I am not the one who thinks is always right.

Yes, you are close minded because you have a bias view of what is acceptable for a League, even though Hysteria fits the category of both "competitive" & "fun", go look up a dictionary if you don't believe me, those are facts, not opinions. That is what a League should be at a core basis, competitive and fun.

LOL, who in their right mind would constantly run into an arguement/debate with the intention of being wrong all the time?

I take advice/help and constantly admit I am wrong to superior intellect outside of this forum on a daily basis almost, again, you are close minded, you don't ask questions you only make assumptions and honestly, whoop-dee-doo lol.

It's not my fault most people on this forum are pretty dim.


it's shocking to me you can't see the huge difference between mastering wxw and hyst for example.

I can see the difference, i've possibly forgot more schemes than you will ever try/test.

As I said before I learned rope much faster than BnG, everyone has different strengths and weaknesses, you can either accept that and enjoy it, or well, be as you are and miss out on the fun :/

You are only upsetting yourself, not me.


The league is already dying and we have let beginners have many choices to play what they want. They are not pushed to become good allrounders anymore. So please tell me how many good allrounders were born in the last 5 years? Ren because he's pushed by other allrounder latinos and Sbaffo.

So what you are saying is we should only play what YOU want to play? Is that it? The whole world revolves around less than a dozen players? Is that what TUS should boil down to? Forget having a variety of fun and interesting schemes, let's just play the ones that the close minded stubborn elitist players want?

Your theory is pretty ridiculous anyway, with or without Hysteria, ALL the other schemes still exist and EVERYONE has the choice to learn them or not.

Newcomers don't enjoy being called noobs and fags and being kicked from TTRR and other schemes where the top players are arrogant f**ks.

Or want to join clans where they are belittled for not being as good as the other players.

That's why they usually end up playing the other schemes, cuz they tend to be more friendly in the long run.

As Kradie said, people will play what they enjoy, SKILL does not matter, winning doesn't matter, people want to have fun.
Title: Re: should hysteria be moved to the free league?
Post by: Sbaffo on January 26, 2017, 03:46 PM
(http://i.giphy.com/t3dLl0TGHCxTG.gif)
Title: Re: should hysteria be moved to the free league?
Post by: Tomi on January 26, 2017, 04:03 PM
Btw i like the most that Random00 or Mablak never posted any complaint about schemes or rules, they just beat everyone in any scheme with any rules and it's that easy ae :D
Title: Re: should hysteria be moved to the free league?
Post by: TheWalrus on January 26, 2017, 04:10 PM
you guys are totally wrong about how the league should be catered toward the top tier or active players, the most important players in tus classic league are the new players, don't know why everyone thinks they are so special in the good old boys club. 

if you hadnt noticed, there isnt really any new players, but yeah, lets make the league more inaccessible to those players.

but as long as the not very active pro players are satisfied, lets go that route and burn it all to the ground

if anything, this league needs to adapt to what is popular on wormnet, not go the opposite direction.  mole shopper should be added to classic league before hysteria is removed.  and i dont like mole shopper one f@#!ing bit. 
Title: Re: should hysteria be moved to the free league?
Post by: lalo on January 26, 2017, 04:30 PM
Whatever Dave, can't discuss with someone who thinks hysteria, t17 or shopper are as challenging/competitive as elite or ttrr. New players don't bother to rope anymore because playing hysteria is much easier. Wanking is easier than getting a pussy too. You're missing the point, Classic League is meant to be a competitive League with the same spirit as XTC or FB leagues. And in strict terms of competition RR, wxw, elite and bng win by a landslide, that's a fact.

And don't even talk to me about having fun in game, you don't see me quitting every bng I'm losing and promising I wouldn't play against someone because I don't like him ''notching'' or not lighting up because ''you didn't give me my favourite colour''.
Title: Re: should hysteria be moved to the free league?
Post by: Senator on January 26, 2017, 04:44 PM
if you hadnt noticed, there isnt really any new players, but yeah, lets make the league more inaccessible to those players.

Were the previous leagues before TUS inaccessible to new players?

if anything, this league needs to adapt to what is popular on wormnet, not go the opposite direction.  mole shopper should be added to classic league before hysteria is removed.  and i dont like mole shopper one f@#!ing bit.

Afaik, Shopper and Intermediate are the most popular schemes on WormNet. I rarely see Hysteria games being hosted (correct me if I'm wrong).
Title: Re: should hysteria be moved to the free league?
Post by: Gabriel on January 26, 2017, 05:34 PM
if you hadnt noticed, there isnt really any new players, but yeah, lets make the league more inaccessible to those players.

Were the previous leagues before TUS inaccessible to new players?

if anything, this league needs to adapt to what is popular on wormnet, not go the opposite direction.  mole shopper should be added to classic league before hysteria is removed.  and i dont like mole shopper one f@#!ing bit.

Afaik, Shopper and Intermediate are the most popular schemes on WormNet. I rarely see Hysteria games being hosted (correct me if I'm wrong).

Supersheeper is more popular than all of those.

Yet you can't put it in classic league because it'd be a complete mess (or would it just be annoying for the elitist players?)

Also...

Schemes aren't similar. Hysteria is probably the least complex scheme in the list right now, simply because of the tactics that have been going around for a good while. What's the challenging part of plopping your own worms? Where's the difficulty in flying a jetpack 40m high then dropping your worm for free turn advantage plus +25 grave damage? How can you compare those with any kind of tactic in Elite?

At the same time (I'm sure this is the thought), where's the difficulty in axe'ing every first turn, then using shotgun? Nothing of that. Elite is way more than that. Late game Hysteria is reduced to tossing petrols from ridiculous distances, or tricky BnG shots. Nothing compared with turn order, rope range, homing usage, etc etc etc.

This discussion is really pointless. How many times do you see newcomers try TTRR? Compare it to the times newcomers try Hysteria. Which one is more noob friendly? WHY is it more noob friendly? Why do people like playing Supersheeper? Because it's simple.

The whole world revolves around less than a dozen players?

Yes probably, that's the amount of players that play the league actively

Why are you talking about "noob friendly" schemes after all? I play newcomers mostly, I try to teach them the rules and some rope tricks and stuff, tell them about schemes. But there have been so little times I've seen someone say "I wanna play leagues". Are newcomers interested in leagues at all?
Title: Re: should hysteria be moved to the free league?
Post by: TheWalrus on January 26, 2017, 05:51 PM
Were the previous leagues before TUS inaccessible to new players?
Only really played cl2k and wl, but these were two very noob friendly leagues that were made up of mostly noobs.  Shopper was the most popular scheme.  There were pros, who obviously didn't like shopper as much as the noobs, but the leagues were built around new players (see div1 and div2 cl2k).  Now obviously having two divisions isn't the answer, but you have lost the overall plot, and that is the point here.  The health of the league doesn't depend on the fairest test of worming ability, your "pro" goggles have blinded you.  The league's viability is bringing in new players, and nothing else.  To constrict the league by removing popular schemes is to basically admit that the current playerbase is all there will ever be, and to rely on those players to always be active from here on out.  That is a losing proposition, as that player pool will slowly die out.   

The only schemes this league should ever consider removing is unpopular ones (Shopper, BnG, Team17), not one of the most actively played schemes (Hysteria)

This season, (games played):

Hysteria   193

BnG   70
Shopper   62
Team17   52

More hysteria games played than the bottom 3 schemes combined.  But yeah, lets remove the scheme from classic.

Instead of looking at it from a prism of "Lets see who is teh most uberleetist champion," how about looking at it from a perspective of, "How can this league be most popular and sucessful for the good of the worms armageddon community"
Title: Re: should hysteria be moved to the free league?
Post by: Sbaffo on January 26, 2017, 05:58 PM
Quote
As Kradie said, people will play what they enjoy, SKILL does not matter, winning doesn't matter, people want to have fun.


Those people don't play a league


Quote
Newcomers don't enjoy being called noobs and fags and being kicked from TTRR and other schemes where the top players are arrogant f**ks.


Ah really? Would you let play someone in your host that doesn't know bng rules and is not even interested to learn those rules? I try to help people that join my hosts as much as i can and as long as they're willing to learn.


This league lacks totally of competition... however hysteria, imo, should still stay in the classic league. What needs to be changed actually is the league system and rules, which became pratically tedious and boring, it's the same shit everyday... what are you're suggestions about it? I'm not here to blame your ideas, because i'm sure this place could get better if we try to collaborate and share our ideas together.

Quote
Are newcomers interested in leagues at all
How can we know that, the proper question is "Are newcomers aware that WA has got a league?" Mostly don't, the answer should be. Because this game is as simple as ut used to be year ago, it gets updated slowly, and things looks like never change, until 4.0 patch is released i guess, the news section is still locked on the 2012 update when it could be used more.wisely. TUS should be sponsorized in wormnet OR we should have a new channel on wmnet dedicated to ranked games. Also as i mentioned before, tus system has to change as well... maybe have two leagues like "pro" and "amateur" league, which in each there are different schemes? I dunno, i have lots of ideas, but i'm not a coder/programmer unfortunately...
Title: Re: should hysteria be moved to the free league?
Post by: Senator on January 26, 2017, 06:24 PM
The only schemes this league should ever consider removing is unpopular ones (Shopper, BnG, Team17), not one of the most actively played schemes (Hysteria)

This season, (games played):

Hysteria   193

BnG   70
Shopper   62
Team17   52

More hysteria games played than the bottom 3 schemes combined.  But yeah, lets remove the scheme from classic.

You would consider removing one of the most popular schemes on WormNet (Shopper)? A moment ago you were bringing in Mole Shoppa cos it's popular on WormNet ;)

Hysteria is popular here on TUS but it has gone out of fashion on WormNet (if I'm right). If Hysteria was moved to Free league, I bet Shopper/T17 would become more popular in Classic league. It's not like the league suddenly loses 193 games.
Title: Re: should hysteria be moved to the free league?
Post by: spleen17 on January 26, 2017, 08:12 PM
If Hysteria was moved to Free league, I bet Shopper/T17 would become more popular in Classic league.

Can't think of anything worse to be honest.
Title: Re: should hysteria be moved to the free league?
Post by: Free on January 26, 2017, 08:40 PM
Senator, Free, if you had your way this League would die.

You are being unbelievably selfish.

I don't even care you don't like Hysteria it just annoys me you don't understand the definition of "competitive" in the English dictionary.

I dont need a dictionary to tell me what I know.

Hyst has potential but aerial atm is closer to a skilled scheme, both skill and tactics wise.
Title: Re: should hysteria be moved to the free league?
Post by: Peja on January 26, 2017, 08:58 PM
Senator, Free, if you had your way this League would die.

You are being unbelievably selfish.

I don't even care you don't like Hysteria it just annoys me you don't understand the definition of "competitive" in the English dictionary.

I dont need a dictionary to tell me what I know.

Hyst has potential but aerial atm is closer to a skilled scheme, both skill and tactics wise.

maybe you should look up your dictionary more often, since losing because of random shit placements  or random generated double damage/ superweapon spawn combos does sound a lot like maxscheme.
Title: Re: should hysteria be moved to the free league?
Post by: h3oCharles on January 26, 2017, 09:02 PM
Afaik, Shopper and Intermediate are the most popular schemes on WormNet. I rarely see Hysteria games being hosted (correct me if I'm wrong).

Shopper, Mole, Supersheeper, Fly/WxW, Others

EDIT1: Guys, should I send MI to this thread?
Title: Re: should hysteria be moved to the free league?
Post by: TheKomodo on January 26, 2017, 10:00 PM
Whatever Dave, can't discuss with someone who thinks hysteria, t17 or shopper are as challenging/competitive as elite or ttrr.

That's interesting, I never once said any scheme is AS challenging as the other, I said they were all as competitive, pay attention please?

New players don't bother to rope anymore because playing hysteria is much easier.

Yes, they do play Rope, there are A LOT of players who play WxW and Big RR presently, they just don't enjoy playing Leagues for whatever reason.

Wanking is easier than getting a pussy too.

True, but at least you save money :D

You're missing the point, Classic League is meant to be a competitive League with the same spirit as XTC or FB leagues. And in strict terms of competition RR, wxw, elite and bng win by a landslide, that's a fact.

As i've already explained, LOOK UP WHAT COMPETITIVE MEANS! Hysteria meets the definition of competitive, period, this isn't debatable, it's a fact.

Why would we want the same spirit as 2 leagues that failed miserably? TUS is better than any predecessor, and schemes like Hysteria is more than likely one reason why.

And don't even talk to me about having fun in game, you don't see me quitting every bng I'm losing and promising I wouldn't play against someone because I don't like him ''notching'' or not lighting up because ''you didn't give me my favourite colour''.

I could stoop to that level and start attacking you personally, but I don't need to because i'm not that insecure, stay on topic please or shut up.
Title: Re: should hysteria be moved to the free league?
Post by: Sensei on January 26, 2017, 10:07 PM
Voted "yes".
Just to see if Komo would really be gone if that happens.

Title: Re: should hysteria be moved to the free league?
Post by: TheKomodo on January 26, 2017, 10:58 PM
From TUS yes, nice to see you wasting a vote though, very mature.
Title: Re: should hysteria be moved to the free league?
Post by: TheWalrus on January 26, 2017, 11:12 PM
You would consider removing one of the most popular schemes on WormNet (Shopper)? A moment ago you were bringing in Mole Shoppa cos it's popular on WormNet ;)
I thought that point was quite obviously demonstrative but apparently you missed out.  I don't actually want mole shopper, can't believe I had to write that, didn't think I would need to spell it out for you. 

If Hysteria was moved to Free league, I bet Shopper/T17 would become more popular in Classic league.
I happen to like hysteria because of my short attention span.  If I couldn't play it, I'd rather not play at all than just start picking something I dislike like shopper/t17.

Your causation makes no sense senator, t17 and shopper are getting less play simply because people do not like these schemes as much at the other options.  Just because hysteria isn't available, it wouldn't make these unpopular options popular by osmosis.
Title: Re: should hysteria be moved to the free league?
Post by: spleen17 on January 26, 2017, 11:24 PM
From TUS yes, nice to see you wasting a vote though, very mature.

It's not an official poll, don't lose sleep over it.

Hyst is going nowhere!
Title: Re: should hysteria be moved to the free league?
Post by: Gabriel on January 26, 2017, 11:29 PM
From TUS yes, nice to see you wasting a vote though, very mature.

It's not an official poll, don't lose sleep over it.

Hyst is going nowhere!

Well it was asked by Senator

And Senator is... well...
Title: Re: should hysteria be moved to the free league?
Post by: Senator on January 27, 2017, 12:05 AM
I thought that point was quite obviously demonstrative but apparently you missed out.  I don't actually want mole shopper, can't believe I had to write that, didn't think I would need to spell it out for you.

My point was that you first used popularity as an argument for Hysteria (to attract new players) but then one of the most popular schemes on WormNet would be first on your removal list.

Your causation makes no sense senator, t17 and shopper are getting less play simply because people do not like these schemes as much at the other options.  Just because hysteria isn't available, it wouldn't make these unpopular options popular by osmosis.

Surely you wouldn't pick Shopper/T17 instead of Hysteria. I was talking about new players and underdogs. Shopper and T17 are the other options for someone who is underdog in every scheme and wants to have the best shot at winning. If winning is irrelevant, they would pick whatever they enjoy (if there's another scheme they enjoy). The point was that some of the Hysteria games would be replaced with other schemes (for example Aladdin wouldn't stop playing Classic league because he wants to get in playoffs. He would be just picking something else besides Roper and TTRR, or more of Roper/TTRR).

Well it was asked by Senator

This is not an official poll. I asked Kory in shoutbox to open a poll as I saw he opened a poll about Elite maps. It was kinda joke but anyway it's nice to see if anything has changed after a couple of years ;D
Title: Re: should hysteria be moved to the free league?
Post by: TheKomodo on January 27, 2017, 12:21 AM
From TUS yes, nice to see you wasting a vote though, very mature.

It's not an official poll, don't lose sleep over it.

Hyst is going nowhere!

:D Thanks :)

I wouldn't leave if Hysteria was taken out, it's the way people act about it that makes me ponder about leaving, of course when I think about it, i'm over reacting, but that's how frustrating it is, it's like watching someone who can't even complete sonic the hedgehog...


@lalo - And anyone in the same boat.

1 more thing, I am open to changing my opinion, I always have been and always will be, but it takes effort to convince me, you can't just say "I don't like it" and don't explain why, you make statements without elaborating WHY you think those things.

You sound like a schoolboy screaming "I don't like it!"

That's why people like M3ntal, StepS, CyberShadow, DeadCode, MonkeyIsland, KoreanRedDragon, Mablak can convince me quite easily when they are actually correct, look at how they write and put their thought across, they go into depth about why they think/feel what they are saying, they use comparisons I understand, they use facts and actually research the subject, and it actually makes me think.

All I see when I read posts like yours is "I don't like it, i'm the king of the castle cuz i'm in the best clan, nah nah nah nah!".
Title: Re: should hysteria be moved to the free league?
Post by: Sensei on January 27, 2017, 12:23 AM
I think TUS will be sad place without you Komo.
Title: Re: should hysteria be moved to the free league?
Post by: TheKomodo on January 27, 2017, 12:31 AM
I dont need a dictionary to tell me what I know.

Hyst has potential but aerial atm is closer to a skilled scheme, both skill and tactics wise.

If you think Hysteria isn't competitive, then you obviously need to re-learn what the word "competitive" means.

I don't care how much skill or tactics is involved in a scheme, if it's fun, and competitive, that's all that matters, and that's also why we have variety to suit all players.

I will however give you a chance to explain WHY you think Aerial has more skill and tactics, if you want me to truly believe you, use facts and research please.

@Walrus

Very nice post about what a League should be, I totally agree :)
Title: Re: should hysteria be moved to the free league?
Post by: Gabriel on January 27, 2017, 12:33 AM
Well it was asked by Senator

This is not an official poll. I asked Kory in shoutbox to open a poll as I saw he opened a poll about Elite maps. It was kinda joke but anyway it's nice to see if anything has changed after a couple of years ;D

thread close

everyone pls get outta here
Title: Re: should hysteria be moved to the free league?
Post by: lalo on January 27, 2017, 12:53 AM
Hahaha Dave, do you really feel insulted or attacked? You rage quitting -in multiple occasions and not only in bng- and demanding your colour even though the other player likes it as much as you are common knowledge but you aren't selfish, the ones that disagree with you are. HOW IRONIC BUDDY!
Don't you get tired of asking people to read a dictonary whenever someone disagrees with you? Congratulations for knowing English, your first and only language, big achievement unlocked. I took a look at some and yet not convinced with Hysteria being a competitive scheme, you can read Gabriel's post and see the reasons yourself but hey you'll always find your way to twist everything to satisfy your huge ego.
I just wanted to give my 2 cents but you find it unreasonable, I'm not trying to convince anyone with my opinion or demanding hysteria to be removed -I even acknowledged I don't see that happening- but you can't respect that, you can't respect anyone but it's nothing new under the sun.
Any time someone says something you don't like you have the urge to embarrass him and say he's a retarded that can't read, can't pay attention, has a narrow thinking, a selfish being that can't enjoy the game and whatever word you find fashionable to show your great English skills. Afterall, most people in this forum are pretty dim and you're our savior who's always right... I wonder why you aren't running this league!. I guess that's why you're constantly arguing with almost every single member. Please, drop some molly again and take a look at this thread. From now on I better stick to your opinions and always nod at you, hope that makes you happier mate!

One more time. IN MY OPINION, Hysteria should not be placed in classic league unless it has some improvement. No place for creativity or advanced tactics unless someone thinks suicides and hiding to throw LG molotovs require skills or it's the pinnacle of competitiveness. No skills needed, as long as you have two working hands and some brain cells you're good to go. I may be right or wrong I don't know but that's how I feel.
Title: Re: should hysteria be moved to the free league?
Post by: TheKomodo on January 27, 2017, 01:03 AM
Ok since you cannot talk like a civilized adult, you had this coming.

I rage quit in games because I don't agree with the sportsmanship of other players notching, because I don't care about winning.

Yes, I know it's childish me wanting green all the time, it doesn't hurt anyone and it's my problem.



Now let's take a minute and discuss your flaws shall we?

How about cheating in TUS with MULTIPLE accounts, still having access to and reading cfc forums through okeis account when you left to make that clan with ropa? Aliasing several players to be in multiple clans at once? Absolutely tearing into Instantly because he lost a lot of games - AT LEAST HE'S TRYING!!!

Or how about asking me to play 2 computers at once to beat CF at a BnG clanner when you were living with me? I am a c**t for actually doing it, but I felt terrible doing it but you were my friend and wanted to make you happy.

All i've done is be confident in myself, I never truly hurt people, but you? You are a f**king bully, a cheat, a smuggler, etc.

After all this I still want to be your friend, but because you cannot accept the way I talk you've f**ked it.

Title: Re: should hysteria be moved to the free league?
Post by: lalo on January 27, 2017, 01:13 AM
Lmao, everyone knows I have "cheated" aliasing a lot of times, I never ever tried to hide it. That's bad I know, but I wanted to give more activity to some clans and the league. Not the best way but I had fun which is the ultimate goal of a game and I am not ashamed for that lol.
Cant remember that stuff of CF tbh,  why would I ask you to do that if you cant play without that huge ass monitor? 
I got angry at Ren,  you have done the same and almost destroyed ckc lol.
I may smuggled some points but you smuggled my underwear HAHAHA.
Title: Re: should hysteria be moved to the free league?
Post by: Sensei on January 27, 2017, 01:14 AM
No wonder these two lived together..
Title: Re: should hysteria be moved to the free league?
Post by: daiNa on January 27, 2017, 01:16 AM
Ok since you cannot talk like a civilized adult, you had this coming.

I rage quit in games because I don't agree with the sportsmanship of other players notching, because I don't care about winning.

Yes, I know it's childish me wanting green all the time, it doesn't hurt anyone and it's my problem.



Now let's take a minute and discuss your flaws shall we?

How about cheating in TUS with MULTIPLE accounts, still having access to and reading cfc forums through okeis account when you left to make that clan with ropa? Aliasing several players to be in multiple clans at once? Absolutely tearing into Instantly because he lost a lot of games - AT LEAST HE'S TRYING!!!

Or how about asking me to play 2 computers at once to beat CF at a BnG clanner when you were living with me? I am a c**t for actually doing it, but I felt terrible doing it but you were my friend and wanted to make you happy.

All i've done is be confident in myself, I never truly hurt people, but you? You are a f**king bully, a cheat, a smuggler, etc.

After all this I still want to be your friend, but because you cannot accept the way I talk you've f**ked it.

and what all this cfc and lalo stuff has to do with anything?
first of i had okeis acounts because i put him in chargue, cfc is my clan still even when i was in other clans,and  i decided to close it and kicked everyone. i founded it with friends, its still ours, period. it was never a secret LOL

u talk about ren? ren loves lalo and me, it was all banter and maybe just a few fights but as mates. u got nothing there again dude

the only thing u can reaveal as lalos "friend" is that cf game i didnt know about. you cheated as well as he did, u are as bad as he is according to your logic


Title: Re: should hysteria be moved to the free league?
Post by: TheKomodo on January 27, 2017, 01:34 AM
Lmfao boxers had totally forgot about that lol.

Daina - That would be like me saying b2b is still mine. And I ask a similar question what does me choosing green or quitting some bngs have to do with anything?

Exactly...

Yeah we all obviously done some bad sht hopefully we can learn from these mistakes and move on.

Since he was trying to make me look bad I was pathetic and done the same, another moment of weakness...
Title: Re: should hysteria be moved to the free league?
Post by: daiNa on January 27, 2017, 01:40 AM
Lmfao boxers had totally forgot about that lol.

Daina - That would be like me saying b2b is still mine. And I ask a similar question what does me choosing green or quitting some bngs have to do with anything?

Exactly...

Yeah we all obviously done some bad sht hopefully we can learn from these mistakes and move on.

Since he was trying to make me look bad I was pathetic and done the same, another moment of weakness...

its a common knowledge cfc still mine, by all its members even xD
Title: Re: should hysteria be moved to the free league?
Post by: TheKomodo on January 27, 2017, 01:52 AM
Yah that totally doesn't  sound selfish lol.

Still the same thing regardless.

And ffs stop changing the subject cuz I AM THE ONE WHO ALWAYS GET BLAMED LOL
Title: Re: should hysteria be moved to the free league?
Post by: Gabriel on January 27, 2017, 02:02 AM
(http://i.imgur.com/6NfmQ.jpg)

Title: Re: should hysteria be moved to the free league?
Post by: avirex on January 27, 2017, 04:53 AM
lol komo...

i made like 5 valid points on why hyst should not be in classic league, and you disputed each and every one... lol...  your a funny guy.. i think you were too busy wanting to argue, and dispute any little thing you could, that you did not notice i actually said hysteria should not be removed.

do you even care??? or do you just want to dispute things??

i remember when i was eager to get my 'w2roper' scheme accepted at TUS, you were the main person on the forum fighting that it should not be accepted into TUS, and its a horrible scheme, etc. etc etc.

i played it with you about a month ago and you said something like "hey, this is a cool scheme, this should be the roper scheme!" so, you proved yourself you never even tried the scheme, you just wanted to debate, fight, and have your presence known then i asked..."wtf dont you remember you fighting me for many many pages regarding this scheme?"   you had no idea... you just like to argue dude..... gtfo


this thread reminds me, about a year ago or longer, i said hysteria will be the death of w:a ... and my prediction is coming true...

all the new players have no interest in roping, because they can play hyst, and be a pro in a week... then when they find out there is a league for hyst they are all about it!!!

but lets be honest, hyst players will have no longevity...  9 out of 10 old schoolers fell in love with the game, and stayed as long as they have because of roping... and if ground schemes were the only option when they started, chances are they would have left long ago....

so yeah... we can aim this league at newcomers with schemes like hysteria, as you suggest walrus... it wont bring longevity though...   i think hysteria is the death of w:a.. but nothing will change.. this thread is useless, its only serving as another thread for komo to hijack.
Title: Re: should hysteria be moved to the free league?
Post by: TheKomodo on January 27, 2017, 05:39 AM
I was expecting you back, kinda disappointed though that you haven't put any effort into challenging any of the things I countered you with.

i made like 5 valid points on why hyst should not be in classic league, and you disputed each and every one...

Which would you prefer, someone debate in a civilized manner, or just insult you and tell you that you are wrong?

The latter being what most people are guilty of here.

Why don't you challenge the things I wrote? I don't know why you don't, maybe you are lazy, maybe you don't have enough ideas/evidence to challenge me, who knows?


i think you were too busy wanting to argue, and dispute any little thing you could, that you did not notice i actually said hysteria should not be removed.

Yes, I noticed you said it should not be removed, I replied to your list for other reasons, because I disagree with some of them, and so that other people have a chance to see both sides of the debate.


do you even care??? or do you just want to dispute things??

If I didn't care I wouldn't be here.

i remember when i was eager to get my 'w2roper' scheme accepted at TUS, you were the main person on the forum fighting that it should not be accepted into TUS, and its a horrible scheme, etc. etc etc.

i played it with you about a month ago and you said something like "hey, this is a cool scheme, this should be the roper scheme!" so, you proved yourself you never even tried the scheme, you just wanted to debate, fight, and have your presence known then i asked..."wtf dont you remember you fighting me for many many pages regarding this scheme?"   you had no idea... you just like to argue dude..... gtfo

I still don't think it should be the TUS scheme, I like the scheme I just don't think it should be the TUS scheme, and cmon dude we've had that many arguements I can't remember every single one off the top of my head, i'm only human not a memory machine :D



all the new players have no interest in roping, because they can play hyst, and be a pro in a week... then when they find out there is a league for hyst they are all about it!!!

Why should they have interest in roping? What is so special about roping?

Nobody can become a pro "in a week" it takes MUCH longer than that to master BnG skills and the physics of WA.

Why do people keep saying that? Sorry but it's incredibly ignorant, not to mention dumb.

but lets be honest, hyst players will have no longevity...  9 out of 10 old schoolers fell in love with the game, and stayed as long as they have because of roping... and if ground schemes were the only option when they started, chances are they would have left long ago....

That isn't true.

While it's true roping was one of the most popular styles of playing this game, Chicken23 doesn't even like Roper, and I certainly didn't stick around because of roping, Mablak/Random00 and countless other players stuck around because they simply enjoy Worms Armageddon and the variety it offers, not JUST roping.

Take away roping, people would still play, and compete. Would you care to try and prove me wrong? I bet you £20 you can't.
Title: Re: should hysteria be moved to the free league?
Post by: Free on January 27, 2017, 08:06 AM
These points have been argued in a million different threads, in a million different ways and I'm not a broken record so...

I'll just grap some popcorn!

Edit: Nobody likes a snitch Komo :(
Title: Re: should hysteria be moved to the free league?
Post by: TheKomodo on January 27, 2017, 09:05 AM
Many already knew he cheats and aliased.

There is a difference between this and for example giving a friend up to the cops.

Title: Re: should hysteria be moved to the free league?
Post by: VoK on January 27, 2017, 01:54 PM
Maybe hyst in freelehuahe and aerial whitout crates in classic?
Title: Re: should hysteria be moved to the free league?
Post by: Sensei on January 27, 2017, 01:59 PM
Leave aerial alone.
Title: Re: should hysteria be moved to the free league?
Post by: Sbaffo on January 27, 2017, 02:16 PM
Yeah leave aerial in free league, else how are aerial player gonna noobbash in classic league?
Title: Re: should hysteria be moved to the free league?
Post by: Sensei on January 27, 2017, 02:33 PM
Ego of some boys here... Hahah :)
Title: Re: should hysteria be moved to the free league?
Post by: VoK on January 27, 2017, 03:15 PM
Omg to pro scheme for classic ?
Title: Re: should hysteria be moved to the free league?
Post by: h3oCharles on January 27, 2017, 03:15 PM
(http://files.gamebanana.com/img/ico/sprays/firein.png)
Title: Re: should hysteria be moved to the free league?
Post by: Kradie on January 27, 2017, 03:23 PM
ZAR Roper scheme for classic ?

YES please :)
Title: Re: should hysteria be moved to the free league?
Post by: avirex on January 27, 2017, 03:45 PM
Komo I know you want to go back and forth, but I'm not going to do this with you...

I think you should be banned from all things league related TBH..

You don't care, you don't play.. and every time there a glimmer of hope something might change that you don't like, you turn into the "give me green or I won't light" child that you are, and say "If this change is made, I'll never play tus again" lol

If I ran this league, your ass would only be able to post in forums like "off topic" and "other games" LMAO...

Let's predict the future... komo will copy and paste the last paragraph then say "but YOU don't run this league, and all i'm doing is presenting FACTS and evidence to back up ALL of my claims, just because you can't handle the facts, and have NO evidence to even try to change my mind does not mean I should be banned"

Did y'all like the emphasized caps on certain words ? Just a little extra komo flair lol

Anyway, komo, I won't debate with you.. but I would like you to go back and read the shit you say...

Do you notice anything anyone says is just opinion? With no evidence.

But your pretend your opinions are facts? It's pretty comical... enjoy your day of breaking down posts into fragments to debate each sentence. (The threads alone don't give you enough to debate, you have to break down each sentence, then type a paragraph on why their opinion is just opinion, and your opinion is fact)

Maybe no one will debate with you the way your starving for, because we are all bored of you by now
Title: Re: should hysteria be moved to the free league?
Post by: lalo on January 27, 2017, 04:01 PM
Stop avi or I will tell all the times you have ever aliased thus cheating in this casual game.
Hysteria is FUN and COMPETITIVE AS MUCH AS TTRR, THIS IS WRITTEN IN THE DICTIONARY, LOOK IT UP YOU ILLITERATE. If you give me any solid argument like you and Gabriel already did I won't listen because Hysteria is FUN,  FUN,  FUN.
Give me my old green, don't beat me with notching, dont say a word if I quit when I am losing, listen to my superior intellect or I'm gone!
Title: Re: should hysteria be moved to the free league?
Post by: Sbaffo on January 27, 2017, 04:04 PM
If komito goes forever tus forums and drama will die...
Title: Re: should hysteria be moved to the free league?
Post by: XanKriegor on January 27, 2017, 04:06 PM
How about Tus RopeFree Season?  :D
Title: Re: should hysteria be moved to the free league?
Post by: avirex on January 27, 2017, 05:00 PM
Stop avi or I will tell all the times you have ever aliased thus cheating in this casual game.
Hysteria is FUN and COMPETITIVE AS MUCH AS TTRR, THIS IS WRITTEN IN THE DICTIONARY, LOOK IT UP YOU ILLITERATE. If you give me any solid argument like you and Gabriel already did I won't listen because Hysteria is FUN,  FUN,  FUN.
Give me my old green, don't beat me with notching, dont say a word if I quit when I am losing, listen to my superior intellect or I'm gone!

lol that reminds me... did anyone notice how in one post, komo said how hysteria was harder for him to learn then bng was???

then in another post, he said bng was harder for him to learn then rope was??

so... to sum things up, hysteria is harder to learn then roping....   and this is the guy that speaks nothing but facts...

1 more thing komo, i said 9 out of 10 old schoolers stuck around because of roping....

you came to me "no, chicken is an oldschooler, and he hates rope"

WRONG: chicken actually does enjoy roping, and even has been improving at rope, and actually can hold his own in rope games (to bad he stopped playing) but for ages, he sucked at rope, so just did not try...

then you said Mablak...

WRONG AGAIN: Mablaks first love was roping, he dedicated more time to perfecting that art then most likely any other wormers, and its payed off... you can not think of rope race legends, or even rope in general, without thinking the name Mablak.

then you said random00

dont know if your right or wrong: but by your track record, your FACT is wrong, im assuming.

so.. just stfu already... we are all sick of your ass.   

did you notice you even argued with the people that said hyst should stay?? you have an illness dude... seek help now.
Title: Re: should hysteria be moved to the free league?
Post by: TheKomodo on January 27, 2017, 06:49 PM
You don't care, you don't play..

Yes, I do, and yes I do lol.

I know it, the universe knows it, doesn't matter if you can't grasp that.

I don't need your approval or your ackowledgement.


komo said how hysteria was harder for him to learn then bng was???

I never said that.

then in another post, he said bng was harder for him to learn then rope was??

I did say that though.

so... to sum things up, hysteria is harder to learn then roping....   and this is the guy that speaks nothing but facts...

Nobody said that, that's just you being silly.

1 more thing komo, i said 9 out of 10 old schoolers stuck around because of roping....

And i'm saying they never, where are they now? Again, you are talking sh*t with no evidence to back up your wild claims.

I agreed that many got addicted to WA because of rope(like myself), but it isn't the only reason they stuck around for 14+ years.

you came to me "no, chicken is an oldschooler, and he hates rope"

Ok, sorry, I got that one wrong, but it is true he became addicted to Default schemes NOT Rope.

then you said Mablak...

WRONG AGAIN: Mablaks first love was roping, he dedicated more time to perfecting that art then most likely any other wormers, and its payed off... you can not think of rope race legends, or even rope in general, without thinking the name Mablak.

then you said random00

No, I never said that, THIS is what I said:


Mablak/Random00 and countless other players stuck around because they simply enjoy Worms Armageddon and the variety it offers, not JUST roping.


It's not my fault OR my problem if you can't read and understand what people ACTUALLY type up.



Title: Re: should hysteria be moved to the free league?
Post by: avirex on January 27, 2017, 07:06 PM
komo, your right.

THANK you for clarifying WHAT you said sometimes i CANT understand....

because you know.. I'm that LARGE part of the community that is DIM.

but WHEN you talk to me WITH cap locks on SPECIFIC words, then i SUDDENLY understand, and REMEMBER how RIGHT you are.

thanks. 
Title: Re: should hysteria be moved to the free league?
Post by: TheKomodo on January 27, 2017, 07:24 PM
Yeah, everytime you know you were wrong you give up, change the subject and start being dramatically sarcastic.

And for the record TTRR isn't more competitive than Hysteria, one is more mentally demanding and the other is more physically demanding.

You can win with 1 worm / turn in Hysteria and you can win with 1 worm / turn in TTRR.

Both schemes are easy to learn and finish, but both take years to master all the combined skills within the game.

2 noobs look bad in both games, anyone could win.

2 pros looks awesome in both games, anyone could win.

A good player can lose to a bad player in both schemes.

I laugh at your failure to see the truth.

Title: Re: should hysteria be moved to the free league?
Post by: Ryan on January 27, 2017, 07:28 PM
And for the record TTRR isn't more competitive than Hysteria, one is mentally demanding the other is physically demanding

Which way round?
TTRR is both.
Title: Re: should hysteria be moved to the free league?
Post by: TheKomodo on January 27, 2017, 07:30 PM
Yeah, in the same sense Hysteria is, if you try to do the jetpack low grav drop combos for example, doing things within the 1s is quite physically demanding.

I should have said TTRR is more physical based and Hysteria is more mental based.
Title: Re: should hysteria be moved to the free league?
Post by: lalo on January 27, 2017, 08:06 PM
Omg hahahha. Yes Dave, a match between dibz, sbaffo vs daina and ryan is not as mentally demanding as a good match of hysteria. Ttrr is unique, it can make you heart race and your hands shake like crazy, a scheme in which every little mistake means you lose.
You dont need any complicated combo to win in hyst. You need to kill your own worms leaving just one of them with good health to pile and kill the opponent,  hide and throw zooks and molotovs.
How can you be so disconneted from reality?
Title: Re: should hysteria be moved to the free league?
Post by: TheKomodo on January 27, 2017, 08:09 PM
Lalo your heart shakes because you really care about winning and finishing your turn doing the best you can.

I get the same feeling from BnG and Hysteria because getting the right shot at the right moment gives me the exact same rush.

Go ask any professional psychologist about these emotions if you can't take my word for it.

You are disconnected from reality? Another silly sentence.

Edit: ooooo let me have a shot.

You don't need any complicated move in ttrr just plop all your worms except one and get to end.

Wheeeeeeee that was fun :) ofc it's bullsh*t just like your example lol.

Have you ever heard the term WYSIWYG?
Title: Re: should hysteria be moved to the free league?
Post by: TheWalrus on January 27, 2017, 08:40 PM
Ttrr is unique, it can make you heart race and your hands shake like crazy, a scheme in which every little mistake means you lose.
if your heart is racing and your hands are shaking like crazy, it merely means you need to get outside more often.  i could truncate this a bit more, but this is the basic reality.  ive never in my life nerded out so hard on worms that my hands shook.
Title: Re: should hysteria be moved to the free league?
Post by: TheKomodo on January 27, 2017, 09:13 PM
Surely you got that slight feeling playing Warmers back in the day Wally? If you didn't, np lol.

An example, from my experience, having the most amazing turns ever, in front of the best players(Saltyk9/Marco/FlowingWater/Jmoberg etc) doing insane kicks scrolls shadows, power spikes etc, and when the 5s timer starts beeping I ALWAYS lose it lol, i'd be like OMG OMG OMG 5 SECONDS QUICK DO SOMETHING EPIC GO GO GO !!!

Where your palms start to get a little sweaty, your heart starts racing faster, and after your turn everyone is like AWESOME TURN BRO! And you are just sitting in your chair fully satisfied shaking :D

I got that from time to time in BnG when it came down to -10hp each lol, the most intense was the BnG with random where I made the epic comeback, i've never felt as satisfied in BnG :D
Title: Re: should hysteria be moved to the free league?
Post by: TheWalrus on January 27, 2017, 09:30 PM
i guess im just clutch
Title: Re: should hysteria be moved to the free league?
Post by: Sbaffo on January 27, 2017, 09:51 PM
Ttrr is unique, it can make you heart race and your hands shake like crazy, a scheme in which every little mistake means you lose.
if your heart is racing and your hands are shaking like crazy, it merely means you need to get outside more often.  i could truncate this a bit more, but this is the basic reality.  ive never in my life nerded out so hard on worms that my hands shook.

I'm sorry but what lalo said is true, call me a nerd, but only ttrr players know this feeling during a league game, because it's actually the only scheme that gives you this feeling.


Yeah, everytime you know you were wrong you give up, change the subject and start being dramatically sarcastic.

And for the record TTRR isn't more competitive than Hysteria, one is more mentally demanding and the other is more physically demanding.

You can win with 1 worm / turn in Hysteria and you can win with 1 worm / turn in TTRR.

Both schemes are easy to learn and finish, but both take years to master all the combined skills within the game.

2 noobs look bad in both games, anyone could win.

2 pros looks awesome in both games, anyone could win.

A good player can lose to a bad player in both schemes.

I laugh at your failure to see the truth.




This is so wrong for so many reasons, and i'll explain you why with a quick example:


ME


Does anyone remember me during my prime in TUS league? If yes, you may remember me as the most spamming hysteria player. I was so addicted by it. And it's not a surprise i was so good at it, simply it took less time to learn and was the easier among all. Everyone likes taking the shortest way... but with time i realized how cheap was that. I began practicing rope schemes, and it took, especially ttrr, countless hours of practice and lots of different keyboards. I used to play even on the same map for hours on the same map to get how to do a certain trick properly, until now... here i am... time rly flies away... you don't even believe how much time i've passed mastering my roping. Because i f@#!ing love this game. And roping is the coolest thing on this game. Besides, the last thing i've just said is only my personal opinion, don't take as a fact ;) in conclusion yes, hysteria is really one of the easiest scheme to master, my personal experience as a new generation player brought me to this conclusion, which is a fairly good proof.


Didn't want to feed this OT trend but... you guys always start it...
Title: Re: should hysteria be moved to the free league?
Post by: TheKomodo on January 27, 2017, 10:00 PM
I'm sorry but what lalo said is true, call me a nerd, but only ttrr players know this feeling during a league game, because it's actually the only scheme that gives you this feeling.

This part specifically - "but only ttrr players know this feeling during a league game" Would you like to bet £1000 that is wrong?

You don't feel other peoples emotions, YOU don't decide what makes people feel that way.

For YOU it's the only scheme that makes you feel that way, i've already said BnG/Hysteria make ME feel that way, I know for a fact it makes Chelsea feel that way, and I know Sniper gets a little sensation in BnG/Hysteria too.

I've even witnessed lalo getting nervous with BnG/Hysteria when he lived with me so for him to turn round and say he doesn't, he's a liar, of course it's not as intense for him as TTRR.

For me TTRR does give me this emotion too but it's not as intense because guess what, here's the secret, it all comes down to how passionate YOU are about whatever it is you are doing.

This emotion happens across all competitive things all over the world, different people feel it differently.

Don't be so ignorant dude, it's a horrible characteristic.
[/quote]


And Sbaffo, that long post you said is entirely opinion based, personally it makes me sound like you surrendered to the cool kids and wanted to become one of them, with TTRR being "the cool scheme".

I done EXACTLY the same thing you explained, but with BnG, Mablak done the same thing you said, with TTRR/Intermediate/Elite.

So I must ask the question, who is right? All of us.
Title: Re: should hysteria be moved to the free league?
Post by: Kradie on January 27, 2017, 10:15 PM
None is right here, it is only personal experience.
Title: Re: should hysteria be moved to the free league?
Post by: TheKomodo on January 27, 2017, 10:24 PM
I typed that very fast cuz at work lol.

I mean we all are right that we experience this feeling.

It's not limited to TTRR lmao.
Title: Re: should hysteria be moved to the free league?
Post by: avirex on January 27, 2017, 10:25 PM
komo, i gave up... its useless to talk to you... you twist things around, contradict yourself more then anyone i have ever seen, for some reason, you think anything you say is a fact, and everything anyone else says is an opinion.

and to make matters worse, you just really have no sense of reality.

i mean, c'mon.. it took you longer to learn bng, then roper?? no way... not a chance in hell.... roping takes about a year, just to be average.... if you say it took you a year to become average in bng, someone needs to slap you....

i learned roping on w2, which was much harder to learn, so maybe im off on saying it takes a year to get average.... but even still... i would say it takes atleast 6 months on w:a

and thats when you get that roping bug, when you want to desperately to compete with pros, so you spend every waking moment playing roper, and practicing roper, practicing shadows, and spikes... etc..

do you know how many ppl did that???  almost everyone that plays worms...

do you know how many ppl came to w:a found hysteria, or bng, and spent every so much time to learn hyst, or bng??? almost no one....

the fact your comparing the hardest scheme in the league (ttrr) to the dumbest, newbest scheme in the league, and still sit here and will argue with everyone about it just shows you have no sense of reality.... and then you will compare the most strategic game on worms (elite) to hyst.. its like wtf dude??? are you mentally stable??

hyst strategy: kill your worms....  tele pile when you can.... hide when you cant.... games always come down to 1v1 darkside fest, lucky shot wins the game....  yeah.. lets compare that to ttrr, because its tricky to do a LG JP NADE!!! LOL c'mon dude... get a grip

we get it dude.. you like hyst... cool.... i think thats what this debate is about, how much you love hyst.... because you have a passion for worms like none other..


also, as far as the heart beating fast, hands shaking, and going numb.... come on komo, thats just in ttrr....  im not even a big fan of ttrr, and not passionate about ttrr at all.... but when your racing someone better then you, and your about to beat them , but still have about 10 seconds left of the map, and you can beat their time if you just finish with no f@#! ups... its a heart pounding moment....

can you rly compare that to bng, when your in a close game, and your on the edge of your seat while the nade travels through the air for 3 seconds?? lmfao just face reality dude... your in your own world...

no matter how many people tell you that your in some komo land, you still will be here "well thats not fact, thats opinion" 

i think this thread is dead now... as i said, we all understand that komo likes hysteria.. lets move on.
Title: Re: should hysteria be moved to the free league?
Post by: Kradie on January 27, 2017, 10:29 PM
I typed that very fast cuz at work lol.

I mean we all are right that we experience this feeling.

It's not limited to TTRR lmao.

In general, experiences can be experienced differently.
Title: Re: should hysteria be moved to the free league?
Post by: DarkOne on January 27, 2017, 10:41 PM
But some people are more right than others, right? :)

People who are in favour of hysteria staying where it is, think it's a competitive scheme (which it is)
People who are in favour of moving it away from classic think it's a dumb scheme because killing yourself right from the start is a viable strategy (which it is)

Solution: random turn order. Those that make the counterpoint that it makes the scheme very much luck driven have no clue how random turn order works and are wrong. It only makes the scheme luck driven if you still go on abusing turn order without paying any sort of attention to the actual turn order.
So if it were up to me, hysteria would have random turn order.
Title: Re: should hysteria be moved to the free league?
Post by: TheKomodo on January 27, 2017, 10:51 PM
People who are in favour of moving it away from classic think it's a dumb scheme because killing yourself right from the start is a viable strategy (which it is)

It isn't dumb, maybe it's abnormal but it is not dumb.

People don't do it JUST for turn advantage, if I can keep all worms in nice positions I will, there are more reasons tan just turn advantage.
Title: Re: should hysteria be moved to the free league?
Post by: DarkOne on January 27, 2017, 10:56 PM
Missing the point.
Title: Re: should hysteria be moved to the free league?
Post by: TheKomodo on January 27, 2017, 10:59 PM
Missing the point.

No, YOU are missing the point.

The object of the game is to win, there are no rules.

Nowhere does it say you should or should not sacrifice your own worms.

Battles of all ages across humanity there have been sacrifices for the bigger picture.

Stop making stupid assumptions to suit your own needs.
Title: Re: should hysteria be moved to the free league?
Post by: Gabriel on January 27, 2017, 11:03 PM
Missing the point.
No, YOU are missing the point.

You didn't mention anything about the solution DarkOne posted
What is this thread about? Are you even in the right topic Komo?

You don't miss points but entire threads
Title: Re: should hysteria be moved to the free league?
Post by: TheKomodo on January 27, 2017, 11:08 PM
I've saw that thread I like the scheme D1 uses but that isn't the point I am making.

To me it's not a solution, it's merely a difference.
Title: Re: should hysteria be moved to the free league?
Post by: DarkOne on January 27, 2017, 11:21 PM
Missing the point.
No, YOU are missing the point.

I make a post that makes no reference to your post, therefore, there is no point to miss.
You make a reference to my post, missing the point of my post.

Saying NOU doesn't change the facts :P

Fine. Make a solid argument that killing your own worm in turn 1 by dropping it in the water without damaging your opponent is useful if you're not allowed to abuse turn order. Because that scenario is why people think hysteria is a dumb scheme.
Title: Re: should hysteria be moved to the free league?
Post by: TheKomodo on January 28, 2017, 12:33 AM
Fine. Make a solid argument that killing your own worm in turn 1 by dropping it in the water without damaging your opponent is useful if you're not allowed to abuse turn order. Because that scenario is why people think hysteria is a dumb scheme.

Off the top of my head, if I have 3 worms on top in nice positions, and my 1st turn is a worm below, and there are no more nice spots left, I will sacrifice that worm so I can focus on having the worms in nice positions to execute nice shots.

That's useful.

But yes, I have actually done it ALSO for turn advantage, which isn't bad, people do it in other schemes as well, why don't people complain about that? When people use kamikaze in Elite? Or sacrifice a worm in Roper or WxW or Team17 or Shopper to gain turn advantage.

Have to go back to work now I might add to this list later.


As for your solution, sorry but I see it as a problem only to people who make it that way in their head, it isn't REALLY a problem, you can't fix what isn't broke, you can make changes to improve it for yourself though.

Title: Re: should hysteria be moved to the free league?
Post by: DarkOne on January 28, 2017, 12:46 AM
Off the top of my head, if I have 3 worms on top in nice positions, and my 1st turn is a worm below, and there are no more nice spots left, I will sacrifice that worm so I can focus on having the worms in nice positions to execute nice shots.

That's useful.

...but objectively inferior to simply teleporting to a better position, unless you plan to abuse turn order.

[...]people do it in other schemes as well, why don't people complain about that? When people use kamikaze in Elite? Or sacrifice a worm in Roper or WxW or Team17 or Shopper to gain turn advantage.

It has been posted here often enough why people think it's a problem in hysteria. When people use kamikaze in elite, they tend to also do a lot of damage to the opposing team with that kami.
When they sacrifice a worm in roper, they do that when the worm is almost dead, not at the start of the game.
Same with WxW and shopper (though I don't know that that ever took place from my own experience, generally, people hold on to their worms).

How often have you seen people sacrifice worms in the latter 3 schemes btw?
I've only had one game of shopper where I killed a worm in my first turn and my opponent followed with perfect piling strategy. He still wasn't able to overcome the loss of that worm, though. Seems counterproductive to not only lose the worm, but also lose a turn to do so.

Nobody is arguing that sacrificing a worm is always a bad thing. You are the only one here who thinks we are.
The argument is that killing off your own worm at the start of the game is a good idea in current hysteria, regardless of the situation.
Title: Re: should hysteria be moved to the free league?
Post by: TheKomodo on January 28, 2017, 01:09 AM
1st off, thanks for debating in a civilized manner, and putting effort/theory into your posts, now i'm enjoying it :)

Off the top of my head, if I have 3 worms on top in nice positions, and my 1st turn is a worm below, and there are no more nice spots left, I will sacrifice that worm so I can focus on having the worms in nice positions to execute nice shots.

That's useful.

...but objectively inferior to simply teleporting to a better position, unless you plan to abuse turn order.

I would always teleport to a better position where one is available, and I will always take advantage of turn order when I feel I need to.

You say "abuse" I say "use" that's the difference right there between us, one mans trash is anothers treasure, as I said before Hysteria has no rules, the objective of the game is to win, no one is being hurt, YOU are limiting your own experience.

[...]people do it in other schemes as well, why don't people complain about that? When people use kamikaze in Elite? Or sacrifice a worm in Roper or WxW or Team17 or Shopper to gain turn advantage.

It has been posted here often enough why people think it's a problem in hysteria. When people use kamikaze in elite, they tend to also do a lot of damage to the opposing team with that kami.
When they sacrifice a worm in roper, they do that when the worm is almost dead, not at the start of the game.
Same with WxW and shopper (though I don't know that that ever took place from my own experience, generally, people hold on to their worms).

Actually, i've seen people plop their 1st worm immediately in WxW/Shopper for 2 reasons - Turn advantage, and it makes the game quicker.

And notice you said "why people THINK it's a problem", I cannot argue with that, you said it perfectly, they THINK.


The argument is that killing off your own worm at the start of the game is a good idea in current hysteria, regardless of the situation.

Sometimes it's a good idea, sometimes it's not, it depends on the map, where the worms are positioned, and turn order, I don't go randomly killing worms for no reason lol.
Title: Re: should hysteria be moved to the free league?
Post by: TheWalrus on January 28, 2017, 01:27 AM
well ive argued with no one more than dave on these forums, but i agree with everything hes said essentially.  you can assassinate his character all you want, but the basis of his arguments is sound.  the way hes gone about it is a little obtuse, but attacking the man isn't the only avenue here.
Title: Re: should hysteria be moved to the free league?
Post by: DarkOne on January 28, 2017, 02:04 AM
1st off, thanks for debating in a civilized manner, and putting effort/theory into your posts, now i'm enjoying it :)

That's how I generally post :) A shouting match is fun for other people, but in the end, both parties think they won the argument and feel the other guy didn't listen. So not something I particularly enjoy.

To be clear, I'm not against turn order abuse as a strategy. It's a good way to improve your chances when you've been dealt a bad card with worm placement and such. It's also a good counter against people hiding one of their 80 HP worms in a difficult/impossible to hit spot while dealing damage with the others.

I just think it becomes silly if there are people who go straight for those tactics in every game right off the bat (which severely limits the possibilities of the scheme imo). Several people have severely overused this strategy straight from the start against me, which killed the fun of the scheme for me.

I'm pretty sure I'm not alone in that assessment, either.
Title: Re: should hysteria be moved to the free league?
Post by: TheKomodo on January 28, 2017, 03:59 AM
That's how I generally post :) A shouting match is fun for other people, but in the end, both parties think they won the argument and feel the other guy didn't listen. So not something I particularly enjoy.

When someone yells at me, i'll yell back, in a way it's shows them i'm not going to be intimidated no matter how many stand against me or whatever bullsh*t they throw in my face, but everytime if someone talks to me civilized, i'll be civilized with them :)

I'm very mushy, generous and kind hearted, but always prepared to fight.

However I sometimes get carried away(like the post with lalo), and that feels bad, especially with some of the things we've experienced together.

To be clear, I'm not against turn order abuse as a strategy. It's a good way to improve your chances when you've been dealt a bad card with worm placement and such. It's also a good counter against people hiding one of their 80 HP worms in a difficult/impossible to hit spot while dealing damage with the others.

Yep :)

I just think it becomes silly if there are people who go straight for those tactics in every game right off the bat (which severely limits the possibilities of the scheme imo). Several people have severely overused this strategy straight from the start against me, which killed the fun of the scheme for me.


I'm pretty sure I'm not alone in that assessment, either.

I totally agree with you there mate, it IS silly people who use this tactic every single game, but I love the fact the choice is there, for me it makes the game very dynamic :)

The difference here is you never dictated that it's dumb, or non-competitive etc, you said it like it is, and that you don't like it, that's all i've ever asked of anyone.
Title: Re: should hysteria be moved to the free league?
Post by: Peja on January 28, 2017, 05:54 AM
Random turn order transforms Hysteria into a  worse, less skilled BnG clone. Plop your worms from the start is like piling each worm of your opponent in elite to me. You speed up the game.

A good BnG player like Komo might even be happy if someone goes 80 hp turnorder tele on several low/mid hp worms. 80 hp is 2 shots, if you hit them. In this scenario 20, 25, 30 beats 80 hp all the time.

There are a few counter elements when it comes to league hysteria.
To fully turn it into cheap version of BnG, is the same as lalo and others did to shopper.
Instead of being forced to react to unique mechanics, you can win it by Nades and Zooks alone.
Instead of being forced to optimize your knocks, go for several attack combos, bait opponents to go for specific worms, you simply turn it into a 30 second roper.

Making schemes more similar to each other in order to raise the needed skill level doesnt make the league allround, it does the opposite.
Why do we have 3 schemes rewarding you for doing the same thing (attacking a worm after a more or less hard rope turn)

People confuse repetitive elements with skill.
A good Allrounder should be able to master several different skills.
If we want to reward allround play we would have to flip the whole league upside down:

Add schemes you need to master unique skills in order to excell in them, like Bungeerace, JPrace, Battlerace, Darts, Intermediate

Komo is right when he says TFL requires more skill than TUS Classic.





Title: Re: should hysteria be moved to the free league?
Post by: Sensei on January 28, 2017, 06:43 AM
Not only that all racing schemes really do involve lot of mastering (even tho 80% ppl from this thread will find it funny) they're actually more fair than the others. And yeah, I don't mind giving explanation:

1. No wind factor - When 2 bng'ers of similar rank get into a fight, wind luck can get pretty one sided, which can affect on game outcome. It's true, whether you believe it or not! (not to mention 2 different sides of map, if not mirrored)

2. No crates luck factor - Shopper, Wxw.. Hmm Team17?!? That scheme shouldn't even be in Free league.

3. No crate positions raping - Lot's of Roper lovers suffer from said disease, from time to time. 18 yrs later, cure is yet to be found. Meanwhile, number of infected ppl growing every day. If you're starting to experience nausea and major butthurt all of a sudden, there's quite a big possibility you played a game of Roper recently.

4. No random tele - even tho great number of ppl, including me, says 'intermediate is w:a' and 'w:a is intermediate' - random teleports can be a bitch sometime.

5. No questionable stuff such as suicide/pile/turn advantage
 - you'll see at least two of mentioned three tactics in 6 out of 8 TUS classic schemes.


Now your turn, hotshot classic league beyond pro players! Tell me, pls, what's that you have against schemes like:
JPR, Boom race, Golf, Big RR, Darts...

They not gonna bring you 10$ for being in first 8? :(
Title: Re: should hysteria be moved to the free league?
Post by: Triad on January 28, 2017, 12:03 PM
We need a racing league :D Not in TUS perhaps but once a year event like WO.

Something like:
* TTRR
* Bungee Race
* Jetpack Race
* Parachute Race
* Boom Race
* Golf
* Battlerace
* Super Sheep Race

Followed by a bo7 PO.

A person who mastered all these 8 would be considered far skilled than those mastered 8 Classic scheme.
Title: Re: should hysteria be moved to the free league?
Post by: Tomi on January 28, 2017, 01:06 PM
Now your turn, hotshot classic league beyond pro players! Tell me, pls, what's that you have against schemes like:
JPR, Boom race, Golf, Big RR, Darts...

They not gonna bring you 10$ for being in first 8? :(
JPR: first it sounded a big bullshit that it hurts our hands, but after i was trying to practice it for the cup with 8 worms on a 120 sec map, i had to accept that it is right. + too less maps

Boom race + golf: i assume that there are not really much maps either and i think these schemes would be really cool for map whoring.. you know, when you choose a map which has special parts where only you know which weapon is the most useful from which place (boom race, in a playoff..), so it could be only added with random generated maps in my opinion.

Big RR: same, map whoring and it requires quite a big monitor for some maps which have big flies and the finish can be quite often draw.

Darts: dunno :D
Title: Re: should hysteria be moved to the free league?
Post by: Chelsea on January 28, 2017, 01:34 PM
let's replace all 8 schemes in clasic league  :-\

elite -> normal
hysteria -> aerial
BnG -> forts
team17 -> mole shoppa

ttrr -> big rr
wxw -> wfw
roper -> darts
shoppa -> holy war (with crates)  ;D
Title: Re: should hysteria be moved to the free league?
Post by: TheKomodo on January 28, 2017, 01:52 PM
Triad that's a great idea a racing league :)
Title: Re: should hysteria be moved to the free league?
Post by: avirex on January 28, 2017, 04:28 PM
if anyone thought these free league schemes were fun, or a good idea... there would be more people playing them...

if you call the free league "classic league" from now on.. which is pretty much what your suggesting...

and the classic league will be called "free league" lol...

everyone will just play free league.


komo, your useless to argue with.... d1 tells you to give one reason why suicide is a good tactic other than for tele pile...

you say... well heres on reason off the top of my head, because if i have 3 worms in good places... and my starting worm is in a bad place.... i would never think to tele him up to a good place with my other 3, my mind tells me to teleport to water...

well if its such a great tactic, then do that in t17 moron.

then you wanna say shit like... "well people use kamikaze in elite, and suicide their mate in roper" lmao.... c'mon man.... as d1 said, kami is used to an attack on opponent, and generally with the weakest worm you have...  or a skunked worm....  suicides in roper are towards the end of the game, in specific situations, definitely not the starting strategy...

and when all else fails you just go with... "well, its just YOUR opinion if you think its NOT a strategy, because i THINK its a strategy, and i LOVE it, cuz im PASSIONATE about HYSTERIA"

the only reason you think its so great, is because its all you know... you, and at least half of the rest of w:a is so stubborn, and never want anything to change...   you fight any kind of change like its your job....is someone paying you for this?? now im curious...

sensei, who said there is "no cure for roper cr8 rape" ????

theres no cure, because no1 accepts change, komo is always in the threads arguing, and threatening to quit this game forever, and boycott tus is anyone even thinks about changing anything.

very mature style of debate komo.... your sitting here acting as if your just so mature, and debate like a politician, and you appreciate d1's debate, and only get hostile when ppl attack you... f@#! off.. your the worst person here for bullshit posts, and hostile behavior lol just another example of how your living in some other reality.
Title: Re: should hysteria be moved to the free league?
Post by: lalo on January 28, 2017, 04:38 PM
Who would kill his own worms in wxw/shopper from the very start? I know, not a skilled player. Hahaha wtf komo,  you don't even know how to play those schemes leave alone elite. I have always had to told you everything you had to do.
Title: Re: should hysteria be moved to the free league?
Post by: TheWalrus on January 28, 2017, 04:51 PM
We need a racing league :D Not in TUS perhaps but once a year event like WO.

Something like:
* TTRR
* Bungee Race
* Jetpack Race
* Parachute Race
* Boom Race
* Golf
* Battlerace
* Super Sheep Race

Followed by a bo7 PO.

A person who mastered all these 8 would be considered far skilled than those mastered 8 Classic scheme.
Gabriel would stomp everyone in this setup, there is no one near to him in expertise over these 8 schemes, except possibly Mablak.
Title: Re: should hysteria be moved to the free league?
Post by: TheKomodo on January 28, 2017, 04:56 PM
avirex, If you don't agree with what I said, then break it down, put some effort and theory into your counter arguements.

I don't even need to debate with you anymore though because DarkOne filled that position perfectly, more people should be like him, trust me, you would notice it's people like you who start the trouble, not me, although admittedly I usually escalate it because i'm relentless.

Who would kill his own worms in wxw/shopper from the very start? I know, not a skilled player.

It's rare, but it has happened.

But please tell me, if every person on the planet did, or didn't, what difference would it make?

Hahaha wtf komo,  you don't even know how to play those schemes leave alone elite. I have always had to told you everything you had to do.

You never HAD to tell me anything, I asked for your advice because I enjoy working as a team, you and daina were a great team and I wanted to learn your tactics, and I enjoy following orders in Elite/Team17, I had to tell you what to do many times as well in all schemes(except TTRR).

The amount of games you/daina literally just waited in Elite/Team17, and done nothing, and ended up losing when I presented ways to win, then afterwards you would say "ah yeah we should try that".

It's called being a team, duh.

You are MUCH better at me in Elite, and I am not ashamed to ask for help to learn from experienced players.




Title: Re: should hysteria be moved to the free league?
Post by: Sensei on January 28, 2017, 05:18 PM
Tomi, I can answer most of these:

You tried only 1 way to play jpr: time trial. Even tho there are few possibilites. 30 sec turn.. fuel usage.. And no, actually, that scheme don't even need special maps. You can play it wherever you want. Even ttrr maps. (tho I imagine, it's not that much of a fun)

Boom race is a great scheme and surely in my top3 on W:A. Especially when played with rubberworm commands /sdet, /ldet. You have 15 seconds and must choose best artillery+angles to get you far on the map. Not only it's hard to learn how to control worm in those situations, it's pretty fun too. I hope plutonic manages to upgrade mapgen so we have good generated maps for this scheme.
You're right about golf tho. Small number of maps. It's shitty when you learn the throws.

Big rr - big screen? Cmon. It's 2017. If ppl can't buy full hd monitor and play proper big rr, then it's really their and not scheme problem. Even if you don't have/want 1920x1080 res, can always lock camera with ctrl+home.

Darts - yeah. I dunno too. This scheme is boring now, but I remember how much fun and competitive it was year ago. When 5-6 ppl will join ag and we were all in same host playin some tourneys on a wide choice of maps. Only negative sides would be teleports every game + fast learning of a throw and repetitive tactics.



I never said these schemes are greater or funnier or more interesting than elite, inter, bng... But in all off them luck factor is gone, what you can't say about most of the classic ones.
Title: Re: should hysteria be moved to the free league?
Post by: Triad on January 28, 2017, 05:32 PM
Big RR: same, map whoring and it requires quite a big monitor for some maps which have big flies and the finish can be quite often draw.
When I reached #1 on Big RR overall for the first time, I was using 1024x768.with ctrl+home. Obviously higher resolution is better but smaller resolution is not a big issue unless you got used to play on higher resolution.
Title: Re: should hysteria be moved to the free league?
Post by: WTF-8 on January 28, 2017, 06:25 PM
as for monitors and resolutions, wkD3D9Wnd paired with wkLobbyCmd ( https://worms2d.info/WormKit ) gives a nice tool to set in-game resolution to pretty much anything you would ever need
I use 1920x1080 for Tower RR and it works fine on my 1366x768 monitor

and talking of WormKit, why doesn't BnG have RubberWorm's auto-reaim yet?
Title: Re: should hysteria be moved to the free league?
Post by: Mega`Adnan on January 28, 2017, 06:38 PM
Rofl, I thought I am the only one who voted "idk". x)
Title: Re: should hysteria be moved to the free league?
Post by: Tomi on January 28, 2017, 07:51 PM
@Sensei, @Triad

Ye i know what you mean.. just to clarify my thoughs.. i was thinking some time about which free league schemes could be merged into classic league.. fortunately i had the best boom race player as a teacher (Ombi, who was also in the 3 best players of jrp too ^^, even though i hated that scheme back then :D) and when i started playing wa i liked the most bigrr and tower race.. on a netbook with 1024x600 resolution, whithout locked screen.. i was a hardcore touchpad user that time xdd

last though: free league is still f@#!ed up because of too long season :)

sry i am drunk, but i hope you get me xd
Title: Re: should hysteria be moved to the free league?
Post by: Triad on January 28, 2017, 07:55 PM
Indeed, Free League currently is a mess. It needs some changes.
Title: Re: should hysteria be moved to the free league?
Post by: Sensei on January 28, 2017, 08:34 PM
In last 5 seasons, I've probably played most free league matches. If mods will be willing to change smth there, I'll be glad to help.
Title: Re: should hysteria be moved to the free league?
Post by: avirex on January 28, 2017, 09:27 PM
What's the point to try to break anything down to you for a counter argument? You are so close minded, it would not make a shit of difference...

For instance, you saying you seen it happen where a skilled player killed his worms as starting game strategy in wxw or shoppa...

You know it's not true, we all know it's not true.. but you don't care what's true, you don't care how dumb you look, you don't care about anything, except for. believing in your twisted reality, that you win the "debate"

Another example, you plopping your first worm in hyst is only because your other3 worms have good placement, and has absolutely nothing to do with tele pile.. lol again, we all know the truth, we all know the reality, even you know the truth komo, but you won't admit it... because you will never admit to losing your precious debate...

We can debate about what color the sky is, if one person says it's blue, you will say it's green, then tell everyone it's a matter of opinion, so your still right.

Here's one example that points to hyst being a broken scheme... even the newer players, that use hosting buddy, and host hyst games just for fun, hate tele pile... they will call you lame, cow, etc. If you tele pile...


So now you have both ends of the spectrum saying the scheme is broken, from newb to pro... but you will still argue.. so enjoy yourself, you look dumb. But that's just an opinion
Title: Re: should hysteria be moved to the free league?
Post by: HHC on January 28, 2017, 10:31 PM
Here's one example that points to hyst being a broken scheme... even the newer players, that use hosting buddy, and host hyst games just for fun, hate tele pile... they will call you lame, cow, etc. If you tele pile...

Hmm.. it's actually the telepile that creates the strategic depth in hysteria. Other than that it's just 1 sec BnG?

Ppl do the same in shopper and roper, but it's a lil different there cause normally you can attack the pile. In hysteria it's harder, unless you tele on top near your other worm.. which again is strategy?

Even if the scheme is a lil 'broken', which IMO it isn't, it's still the most popular scheme.. among pro and newbs alike. Rid of it and you lose a lot of players' interest. Don't think a lot of ppl feel eager to play classic league just to get their ass owned by TTRR players who are ALWAYS 10 secs faster. :x There need to be schemes in which the playing field is more leveled.
Title: Re: should hysteria be moved to the free league?
Post by: Krezo on January 28, 2017, 11:07 PM
HHC, I totally agree with you. The best tactic in hysteria is telepile. And of course hysteria should still be part of the classic league.

I see that people who are complaining here about hysteria are mostly newcomers or even players who play tus for years but never tried to play hyst, elite, roper, shopper... I guess they are just afraid but it not my business. If they thinks it is easy and lame to use it then try to beat MonkeyIsland, Random, etc.. (in their best times xD). Being good in bng or fast (e.g. jp+lg+zook) doesn't mean that you are good in hysteria. It is advantage but it has nothing with tactic. It is something that you can just practice in offline mode.

And people who think that BoomRace, Darts or Golf should be part of the Classic Leauge should first learn how to play current classic schemes.
Title: Re: should hysteria be moved to the free league?
Post by: Sensei on January 29, 2017, 03:41 AM
And people who think that BoomRace, Darts or Golf should be part of the Classic Leauge should first learn how to play current classic schemes.

No one here said that. When I joined TUS, you were among few ppl that helped me to figure out how this thing works. Wasn't much of a help, tbh, but I appreciate the effort.

Now.. you're commenting this thread after 1-2 years of inactivity.
I could say more about you personally, and give evidences of how salty as player you are but nvm. No one gives a f@#!. I'm always open to play boom,jpr,darts.. If you're the "real pro" you're not gonna have hard time winning all of mentioned schemes that you think every noob can handle at first sight ;)
Title: Re: should hysteria be moved to the free league?
Post by: TheWalrus on January 29, 2017, 03:51 AM
why cant we all get along
Title: Re: should hysteria be moved to the free league?
Post by: Kradie on January 29, 2017, 04:22 AM
why cant we all get along

To answer your sentence. It's human nature.
Title: Re: should hysteria be moved to the free league?
Post by: TheKomodo on January 29, 2017, 08:47 AM
For instance, you saying you seen it happen where a skilled player killed his worms as starting game strategy in wxw or shoppa...

I am not the only person in this thread who said they have seen that, so you are wrong there, I said it's very rare.

Another example, you plopping your first worm in hyst is only because your other3 worms have good placement, and has absolutely nothing to do with tele pile.. lol again, we all know the truth, we all know the reality, even you know the truth komo, but you won't admit it... because you will never admit to losing your precious debate...

What is the truth? Please tell me, you can cry all you want and say this and that, but without actually giving any evidence you are just trash talking lol.

We can debate about what color the sky is, if one person says it's blue, you will say it's green, then tell everyone it's a matter of opinion, so your still right.

Yes, please change the subject again, please, tell me more :)

Here's one example that points to hyst being a broken scheme... even the newer players, that use hosting buddy, and host hyst games just for fun, hate tele pile... they will call you lame, cow, etc. If you tele pile...

Some BnG players like to play without throwing rollers, or repeating shots, it doesn't make people who do lame, it's just a made up fantasy in their heads.

Same as people who hide on top in Roper.

Again, you are just trash talking with absolutely NO evidence, or any intelligent, thought out theory to back up ANYTHING you say.


So now you have both ends of the spectrum saying the scheme is broken

Just because someone says something, doesn't make it true, also, there are players from "both ends of the spectrum" agreeing with me too.

And people who think that BoomRace, Darts or Golf should be part of the Classic Leauge should first learn how to play current classic schemes.

Such as me? Who has played pretty much every scheme there is?

I've even tried project X schemes, they are awesome but not simple enough/stable enough to run for everyone.

Darts, Golf, BoomRace are all better than Shopper/Team17/Roper, at least if your opinion for a competitive League is to be skill based with no luck.
Title: Re: should hysteria be moved to the free league?
Post by: Senator on January 29, 2017, 09:19 AM
The early game doesnt matter at all most of the times, but the midgame is the time where you can gain an advantage for the endgame. I think in ~75% (thats just a random guess out of my memory) of the games I have an HP lead when it's down to 1vs1 in Hysteria.

But imo, there are easy-to-execute tactics that can give you a gamble situation at the end. I never saw anyone actually doing it against me yet, but I think this is the main flaw of hysteria. It kinda leads to the situation that Free described, where its down to one nearly horizontal shot with zook at the end of sd.
Depending on the map and the bng skill of the player that uses this tactic you can win at least 1 out of 3 games against ANY player. I can't prove it, cause like I said, I've never seen anyone tyring to play like this, cause your winning chances are <50% like this, imo, because your opponent has to miss one important shot for you to win.
Even if the game doesn't go your way you can still save it late game by hiding on the edge of the map, forcing SD, hope for your opponent to miss once you teleport up (of course it's a gamble, nobody has 100% accuracy, not even you Komo), and then have a big chance to gg him. The success rate of this is, as has already been said, less than 50%, but even if it were only 10% it's still ridiculously high for not doing anything productive during the entire game.
Title: Re: should hysteria be moved to the free league?
Post by: TheKomodo on January 29, 2017, 10:05 AM
The early game doesnt matter at all most of the times, but the midgame is the time where you can gain an advantage for the endgame. I think in ~75% (thats just a random guess out of my memory) of the games I have an HP lead when it's down to 1vs1 in Hysteria.


That's a nice way to put it but depends entirely on a persons perspective and how they play, I cannot disagree that for Random, that's how it is.

I will definitely say that in some games the 1st few turns have little to no effect on the outcome of the game, but that's true for almost every scheme, again, depending on your perspective.

He might look at my 1st turn as unimportant, but for me my 1st turn can kill/push an enemy worm and steal the best spot on a map.


But imo, there are easy-to-execute tactics that can give you a gamble situation at the end. I never saw anyone actually doing it against me yet, but I think this is the main flaw of hysteria. It kinda leads to the situation that Free described, where its down to one nearly horizontal shot with zook at the end of sd.
Depending on the map and the bng skill of the player that uses this tactic you can win at least 1 out of 3 games against ANY player. I can't prove it, cause like I said, I've never seen anyone tyring to play like this, cause your winning chances are <50% like this, imo, because your opponent has to miss one important shot for you to win.

Again, this is just opinion based and depends on your perspective, what you see as a flaw, other people see it as something they enjoy and appreciate, 99/1, 1/99 or 50/50 it's still true.

He says he can't prove it, why is that? If it's "easy-to-execute" then why couldn't he prove it? 1 reason would be because Hysteria games(like all schemes) usually have the same outcome in the end, but it's never the same step-by-step shots/positions/tactics, the same things happen again and again but in different orders/ways.(After all, it is a sandbox game)


Even if the game doesn't go your way you can still save it late game by hiding on the edge of the map, forcing SD, hope for your opponent to miss once you teleport up (of course it's a gamble, nobody has 100% accuracy, not even you Komo), and then have a big chance to gg him. The success rate of this is, as has already been said, less than 50%, but even if it were only 10% it's still ridiculously high for not doing anything productive during the entire game.

Even if Elite doesn't go your way you can get a few lucky roller nades and do a lot of damage and make a huge comeback.

Part of the fun of Hysteria is that whole rush at the end trying to get those perfect shots off.

This cannot be argued - If aimbots played Hysteria, it wouldn't be a problem, so it comes down to a players skill and the luck they create, which is totally acceptable.(and NOT a flaw.)

Point being, YOU are in control of your shots, you don't press a button and a random shot happens, YOU aim and YOU let go of the space to judge pwoer, you could practise enough you get to the point where you rarely miss, like me in BnG at my peak.

Being SO good at nades/zooks makes people fear you, such as people fear hiding more open Vs me in Elite, they know I will destroy them with BnG, THIS has an affect on a game as well.
Title: Re: should hysteria be moved to the free league?
Post by: Krezo on January 29, 2017, 10:26 AM
And people who think that BoomRace, Darts or Golf should be part of the Classic Leauge should first learn how to play current classic schemes.

No one here said that. When I joined TUS, you were among few ppl that helped me to figure out how this thing works. Wasn't much of a help, tbh, but I appreciate the effort.

Now.. you're commenting this thread after 1-2 years of inactivity.
I could say more about you personally, and give evidences of how salty as player you are but nvm. No one gives a f@#!. I'm always open to play boom,jpr,darts.. If you're the "real pro" you're not gonna have hard time winning all of mentioned schemes that you think every noob can handle at first sight ;)

WTF are you talking about? Dude, you didn't get my point. This is like 100th tread about "hysteria should be banned or moved..." and always the same comments.

But there are many pro players that play hysteria, elite, roper, TTRR, boomrace, darts, golf... and they are not complaining, e.g. Komo, Husk, tita..

Sensei, you should be like them as well. Before you comment something, consider both sides. But you cannot consider one side because you do not play it and you do not know how is it.

Mentioned schemes (boomrace, golf...) are fun and requires a lot of skills, but there is no strategy there like in e.g. hysteria. That is what these schemes make incomparable.

Do not worry about me Senesi, I am just nostalgic sometimes and I cannot get over the days when I was pro xDDD
Title: Re: should hysteria be moved to the free league?
Post by: Sensei on January 29, 2017, 11:27 AM
Unless ppl agrees to make some changes in hyst it never will be considered as serious scheme. I don't have to play everyday to get that. And had fair amount of hyst games, anyway. Can describe it in one sentence:

INF PETROL!???  :'(
Title: Re: should hysteria be moved to the free league?
Post by: h3oCharles on January 29, 2017, 12:29 PM
INF PETROL!???  :'(

That
Title: Re: should hysteria be moved to the free league?
Post by: ANO on January 29, 2017, 01:09 PM
haha this bullshit again
Title: Re: should hysteria be moved to the free league?
Post by: Senator on January 29, 2017, 04:15 PM
Even if Elite doesn't go your way you can get a few lucky roller nades and do a lot of damage and make a huge comeback.

Yeah but the chance of a comeback after a shitty early + mid game is much higher in Hysteria than in any other Classic scheme (except TTRR which is not comparable cos it's time trial) and that's why many hate it. That's also why many like it (you can make funny turns and stay in the match).

Even if the scheme is a lil 'broken', which IMO it isn't, it's still the most popular scheme.. among pro and newbs alike.

It can be popular for different reasons.. for example daiNa has said she picks Hysteria cos it's faster and she is rusty. That doesn't mean she thinks it's a great scheme with much depth.
Title: Re: should hysteria be moved to the free league?
Post by: TheKomodo on January 29, 2017, 04:43 PM
Even if Elite doesn't go your way you can get a few lucky roller nades and do a lot of damage and make a huge comeback.

Yeah but the chance of a comeback after a shitty early + mid game is much higher in Hysteria than in any other Classic scheme (except TTRR which is not comparable cos it's time trial) and that's why many hate it. That's also why many like it (you can make funny turns and stay in the match).

I've been 100+ behind in BnG - SO MANY TIMES - still came back and won, same with Roper, same with WxW, same with Team17 etc, that has nothing to do with the scheme being league worthy and competitive, that's just a few select players being whiny bitches.

It can happen more often in Hysteria yes, still doesn't make it any less competitive.

Even if the scheme is a lil 'broken', which IMO it isn't, it's still the most popular scheme.. among pro and newbs alike.

It can be popular for different reasons.. for example daiNa has said she picks Hysteria cos it's faster and she is rusty. That doesn't mean she thinks it's a great scheme with much depth.

Whether daina likes to admit it or not, she's an excellent Hysteria player, she's played hundreds of them, she's very experienced and that's why she wins.
Title: Re: should hysteria be moved to the free league?
Post by: Gabriel on January 29, 2017, 06:09 PM
How boring
All these long posts, and at the end of the day nothing productive comes out of anything
Just selfish posts and offtopic essays
Including this one
Title: Re: should hysteria be moved to the free league?
Post by: TheKomodo on January 29, 2017, 06:31 PM
Do people lack a certain part of their brain that makes them incapable of realizing other people can and do enjoy things they don't?

No matter how many people say "boring" "stupid" "offtopic" etc, it's still gonna happen, so stop wasting your own time and go do things you actually enjoy :D
Title: Re: should hysteria be moved to the free league?
Post by: ANO on January 29, 2017, 10:22 PM
just improve your synthesis skills  ;)
Title: Re: should hysteria be moved to the free league?
Post by: Triad on January 30, 2017, 11:06 AM
Well, removing hysteria might be unlikely because as poll shows too, no dominant vote for removal. So what about:
* 4x Petrol bomb instead infinite
* 5, or max 7 sec SD clock.
* Once someone suggested to add drill to counter certain type of darksiders, how did that turn out?
* Also if people killing their worm is annoying, why not make worm a more valuable asset. Maybe instead 4x80hp teams, try 3x100hp?

Just trying to come up with suggestions.
Title: Re: should hysteria be moved to the free league?
Post by: Xrayez on January 30, 2017, 11:16 AM
No.
Title: Re: should hysteria be moved to the free league?
Post by: HHC on January 30, 2017, 12:03 PM
Even if the scheme is a lil 'broken', which IMO it isn't, it's still the most popular scheme.. among pro and newbs alike.

It can be popular for different reasons.. for example daiNa has said she picks Hysteria cos it's faster and she is rusty. That doesn't mean she thinks it's a great scheme with much depth.

Does it matter?
It's a 'light' scheme, the turns go by fast, the pace is good, the games are usually not too long and tight until the end even if the players are of different overall skill level. It's definitely a reason why it's so popular.

Contrary to some of the classic league schemes.. like BnG.. WxW.. TTRR. Schemes that are IMO to blame for the dead of TUS. At some point we decided to stick to our old favs and to schemes that clearly benefit the strongest players, rather than embrace the schemes that the vast majority of (noob) players played on wormnet. Like normal, like shopper, like hysteria. If we had slightly adjusted those popular schemes to a league format we'd be way better off right now. IMO.



Title: Re: should hysteria be moved to the free league?
Post by: nino on January 30, 2017, 01:22 PM
All we need to do is point the classic schemes, the rest will be moved to free league ok?

So

Elite / Roper / T17 / RR / Shoppa / BnG are classic schemes!

Rest are porra scheme and must be moved to porra league ok?????

did the king was clear????

 :D :D :D

Title: Re: should hysteria be moved to the free league?
Post by: lales on January 30, 2017, 01:39 PM

Intermediate Elite / Roper / T17 / RR (NOT TTRR) / Shoppa / BnG are classic schemes!


Si?
Title: Re: should hysteria be moved to the free league?
Post by: avirex on January 30, 2017, 10:47 PM

Contrary to some of the classic league schemes.. like BnG.. WxW.. TTRR. Schemes that are IMO to blame for the dead of TUS. At some point we decided to stick to our old favs and to schemes that clearly benefit the strongest players, rather than embrace the schemes that the vast majority of (noob) players played on wormnet. Like normal, like shopper, like hysteria. If we had slightly adjusted those popular schemes to a league format we'd be way better off right now. IMO.

i agree with you here, to a certain degree...   we might have more players interested in league, but how long would they last for? if we cater to newer players, and make it ok for them to not learn, and master the greatest scheme in the game (roping, and all its variations) then there will be no longevity to those players...

i know komo will come here and say its just my opinion, and him and hundreds of others love bng blah blah blah....

but, im sure 90 out of 100 wormers would agree with me that roping is was really drew them to this game, if it was not for roping, they would not have got so attached to worms, and invested nearly as much time.... sure, after the roping drew them in, they discovered other schemes, and invested time into those to master as well... but roping was the main reason.... i already touched on this a couple pages back, and komo tried to disagree with me, only because he likes to debate...

but before he comes here and says the same old thing.. let me just say, in W:As prime, roping was about the only scheme played... its was by far the most popular scheme.... the more and more we catered to newbs, the less and less popular it came, IMO... and hyst is the death of w:a :D   i truly believe that.

ok komo, have fun.
Title: Re: should hysteria be moved to the free league?
Post by: TheWalrus on January 30, 2017, 11:04 PM
Contrary to some of the classic league schemes.. like BnG.. WxW.. TTRR. Schemes that are IMO to blame for the dead of TUS. At some point we decided to stick to our old favs and to schemes that clearly benefit the strongest players, rather than embrace the schemes that the vast majority of (noob) players played on wormnet. Like normal, like shopper, like hysteria. If we had slightly adjusted those popular schemes to a league format we'd be way better off right now. IMO.
If there is anything that is a rampant problem in this community it is just what HHC said, and what I referenced in an earlier post, TUS has a problem of attraction.  I see many new players logging on to wormnet, but not many making the jump to league registration and playing.   Part of that is the inevitable division of players that occurs, when a game has been around for years and years, some players become incredibly proficient and skilled at playing the game.  The skill gap has never been larger than what it is right now

Becoming an above average allrounder in classic league currently has a learning curve that I would average at about 1-2 years of playing 20 hours a week.  Other games (allbeit more popular games with a larger player base) have matchmaking systems that allow players to feel more instantly competitive by being matched with players of their own skill levels.  Who really wants to be swatted around in classic league for season upon season by worms pros?  Practically no one, judging by the current circulation of new players on TUS.  I don't pretend to know all the answers, nor do I have a solution, but it is obvious that any solution has to take into account what new players like to play, and finding a competitive playing field on which to play it. 

The vitality of this league is only as strong as its adaptive tenets, and I forsee a future where league activity declines if changes are not made.  I'm not yet sure what those changes look like, but the classic schemes appear to not be the answer as the older players retire for good. 
Title: Re: should hysteria be moved to the free league?
Post by: nino on January 30, 2017, 11:13 PM
Contrary to some of the classic league schemes.. like BnG.. WxW.. TTRR. Schemes that are IMO to blame for the dead of TUS. At some point we decided to stick to our old favs and to schemes that clearly benefit the strongest players, rather than embrace the schemes that the vast majority of (noob) players played on wormnet. Like normal, like shopper, like hysteria. If we had slightly adjusted those popular schemes to a league format we'd be way better off right now. IMO.
If there is anything that is a rampant problem in this community it is just what HHC said, and what I referenced in an earlier post, TUS has a problem of attraction.  I see many new players logging on to wormnet, but not many making the jump to league registration and playing.   Part of that is the inevitable division of players that occurs, when a game has been around for years and years, some players become incredibly proficient and skilled at playing the game.  The skill gap has never been larger than what it is right now

Becoming an above average allrounder in classic league currently has a learning curve that I would average at about 1-2 years of playing 20 hours a week.  Other games (allbeit more popular games with a larger player base) have matchmaking systems that allow players to feel more instantly competitive by being matched with players of their own skill levels.  Who really wants to be swatted around in classic league for season upon season by worms pros?  Practically no one, judging by the current circulation of new players on TUS.  I don't pretend to know all the answers, nor do I have a solution, but it is obvious that any solution has to take into account what new players like to play, and finding a competitive playing field on which to play it. 

The vitality of this league is only as strong as its adaptive tenets, and I forsee a future where league activity declines if changes are not made.  I'm not yet sure what those changes look like, but the classic schemes appear to not be the answer as the older players retire for good.

Something that i loved when i started playing was the div1 and div2 from cl2k, really encouraged myself to get on div1 and of course first i had to get some skill and kill the putos on div2, this was fantastic!

MI could think on something like this, look at Sbaffo he gets to frustrated cos of noob bashing and peoples avoiding him, maybe this couls help a bit cos only peoples on his skill level could play with him.

well i dunno the king only want to help ae : D 
Title: Re: should hysteria be moved to the free league?
Post by: avirex on January 30, 2017, 11:16 PM
Walrus, the problem with this is.... we have a free league, newbs are welcome to play it... nobody wants to...


so then there is an idea of divisions.... PROS, and.... wahtever you wanna call the not so pros....

but that only splits up our already small community...

i do agree, we have to attract the newer players some how... but also, is that what we want worms to turn into??? Hysteria, and Shoppa fest in 5 years from now?? because we are only going to cater to the newbs weakness, and not push them to get better??? 

i dont know what the answer is either, and clearly something needs to change, ill agree with that.... but who the hells know what that is... and with people that debate any sign of change, at every turn... it makes it very difficult to ever find a solution
Title: Re: should hysteria be moved to the free league?
Post by: TheKomodo on January 30, 2017, 11:23 PM
i know komo will come here and say its just my opinion, and him and hundreds of others love bng blah blah blah....

Nope avirex, you pretty much said everything better this time :)

There are a few things I don't agree with in the 1st part though:

i agree with you here, to a certain degree...   we might have more players interested in league, but how long would they last for? if we cater to newer players, and make it ok for them to not learn, and master the greatest scheme in the game (roping, and all its variations) then there will be no longevity to those players...

Without a doubt Roper WAS the most popular scheme, waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaAAAAAAAAAAAAAAY back then...

But honestly, it's been 17 years, I don't even think you could say Roper is the most popular scheme of all time, I would personally guess Shopper would be the most popular scheme of all time(guessing it's the most played?)

It would be interesting to find out once and for all what scheme has been played the most since WA started back in 1999, but, we can't, can we?

I don't understand why you associate longevity with just Roping, what do you base this assumption on? Do you have evidence we don't? I think if you combined every scheme played in TUS(rope based vs non rope based), you may be surprised at the outcome?

I think it's a combination of everything possible, that keeps players interested in Worms, they can Rope one day, then Hysteria the next, then Mine Madness another day etc, they can do whatever they want lol, granted, for guys like us, it was Roper/Warmer that got us hooked immediately, these days it's more Hysteria, Aerial, Kaos, Darts etc.

Things change mate, don't be upset about it, it's not like you have no one to Rope with lol.




but, im sure 90 out of 100 wormers would agree with me that roping is was really drew them to this game, if it was not for roping, they would not have got so attached to worms, and invested nearly as much time.... sure, after the roping drew them in, they discovered other schemes, and invested time into those to master as well... but roping was the main reason.... i already touched on this a couple pages back, and komo tried to disagree with me, only because he likes to debate...

but before he comes here and says the same old thing.. let me just say, in W:As prime, roping was about the only scheme played... its was by far the most popular scheme.... the more and more we catered to newbs, the less and less popular it came, IMO... and hyst is the death of w:a :D   i truly believe that.

ok komo, have fun.

The last time you STATED it was roping that kept 9/10 players here(as a fact), this time you are suggesting 90/100 wormers were drawn to WA through Roping, and even though I think it's more like 70% of players, I do believe it was roping that got most players hooked, but it's not the SOLE reason they stayed with the game.

I disagreed with you before because of the way you worded it, passing off things as facts instead of theory, that annoys me, this time you worded what you thought more carefully.

Definitely without a doubt back in the days of WACL roping WAS the most popular scheme, but there could be several reasons why, not because it's the greatest scheme of all time, but it was the most fun available at the time.

Many of the schemes people love now weren't even available back then, if Hysteria/Kaos/Darts/TTRR etc were available immediately when WA began, I think Roper wouldn't even exist as a League scheme lol, it would be replaced by TTRR/WxW or something.

And honestly, you keep saying you think Hyst is the death of W:A, but don't you remember that period sometime between 2004 and 2008 when WA was really dead online most of the time? I feel things like Rubberworm and schemes like Hysteria saved it, neither of us can prove the other wrong about that can we?



EDIT - Oh, and a personal note - I think Elite is the greatest scheme of all time.
Title: Re: should hysteria be moved to the free league?
Post by: Senator on January 30, 2017, 11:46 PM
"light league" = Elite, Roper, Shopper, Hysteria, BnG
Title: Re: should hysteria be moved to the free league?
Post by: MonkeyIsland on January 31, 2017, 05:52 AM
@Komo, @avirex,

You're going down that road again. Use TUS's PM function.
Title: Re: should hysteria be moved to the free league?
Post by: ANO on January 31, 2017, 09:00 AM
has hysteria been part of classic league for ...8 years or so? just asking
Title: Re: should hysteria be moved to the free league?
Post by: HHC on January 31, 2017, 11:29 AM
so then there is an idea of divisions.... PROS, and.... wahtever you wanna call the not so pros....

but that only splits up our already small community...

i do agree, we have to attract the newer players some how... but also, is that what we want worms to turn into??? Hysteria, and Shoppa fest in 5 years from now?? because we are only going to cater to the newbs weakness, and not push them to get better??? 

i dont know what the answer is either, and clearly something needs to change, ill agree with that.... but who the hells know what that is... and with people that debate any sign of change, at every turn... it makes it very difficult to ever find a solution

I think Senator's light league could help.
Atm new players are not only faced with players who have played for 5 or more years than they have, but also with 5 to even 6 schemes that they have never played before. And worms schemes are generally far apart, it's not like a different mode in Call of Duty which is all essentially the same idea: shoot the opponent.

Limiting the number of schemes would help. Elite, roper, shopper, hyst & bng is a pretty good selection IMO. Although I still think we need an alternative to BnG, mostly because of the ridiculous house rules regarding 'cheap' shots and repeats and all that. Elite could also be a little lighter.. incorporating some elements from normal: like 20sec turn time, a slightly better rope, such things.

Aside from this new TUS standard league, we could make a small league for the veteran players with more challenging (or really classic) schemes. With 20-25 players in it that can qualify either through special cups or by scoring high in the standard league (and get demoted if they suck or get inactive). This small classic league could then include TTRR, the real Elite, hardcore BnG, WxW instead of shopper etcetera. It would be a prestigious league to win, cos hardcore & no more naabbashing in regular season. On the other hand we would have the standard league that would be closer to what is going on on wormnet these days and be a nice league as introduction and for casual gamers.

Free league is redundant IMO. We should limit those schemes to cups/tourneys. Or allow them in a 'misc' scheme reporting.. a scheme that may only be picked when both players agree. That would allow ppl to pick TTRR as well in the standard league.. but only if the opponent agreed to it.
Title: Re: should hysteria be moved to the free league?
Post by: Sbaffo on January 31, 2017, 11:31 AM
Pro league and amateur league! :)
Title: Re: should hysteria be moved to the free league?
Post by: Kradie on January 31, 2017, 11:55 AM
Pro league and amateur league! :)

Finally someone gets it :)
Title: Re: should hysteria be moved to the free league?
Post by: nino on January 31, 2017, 12:15 PM
Pro league and amateur league! :)

Thats a good idea ae

Which schemes would be in pro league? 

Title: Re: should hysteria be moved to the free league?
Post by: Sensei on January 31, 2017, 12:19 PM
Don't know why ppl still talk about newcomers playing leagues, when 90% of ppl will just kick any unfamiliar name out of the lobby. You know it's true.

In the times of big steam sales, there should be a little pop-up window in #ag which, in few short lines, explains to newbies what to expect out of this game and where to find all answers. Linking them to TUS ofc.

I guess it's better then to join 3 games, get kicked 3 times. Then ask in lobby why everyone acts like morons, just to get some witty answer by taner.

Was this a pleseant first sight for the new guy?
- Nope.
Title: Re: should hysteria be moved to the free league?
Post by: TheKomodo on January 31, 2017, 01:06 PM
Great post HHC.

Ok let's think about this, whenever someone hosts a Cup for a dedicated scheme, those dedicated players always join, TTRR/BnG/Team17 etc, without fail these Cups are always successful.

Light League is a great idea, get rid of Classic & Free entirely, and build a new league with 4, 5 or 6 of the most popular, easy to learn/play schemes that are still impressive in their own way.

We have Tournaments and Cups for people who still want to play BnG/TTRR/BattleRace etc, and they DO work/bring in players.



Title: Re: should hysteria be moved to the free league?
Post by: Tomi on January 31, 2017, 02:23 PM
Don't know why ppl still talk about newcomers playing leagues, when 90% of ppl will just kick any unfamiliar name out of the lobby. You know it's true.

In the times of big steam sales, there should be a little pop-up window in #ag which, in few short lines, explains to newbies what to expect out of this game and where to find all answers. Linking them to TUS ofc.

I guess it's better then to join 3 games, get kicked 3 times. Then ask in lobby why everyone acts like morons, just to get some witty answer by taner.

Was this a pleseant first sight for the new guy?
- Nope.
Long ago we made a welcome bot which sent a welcome message and some info + link to tus forum. Dunno the result, but i guess who is willing to stay at least 2 weeks to play wa he should meet the term tus and "rules". The problem is when he doesnt know English.
Title: Re: should hysteria be moved to the free league?
Post by: TheKomodo on January 31, 2017, 03:40 PM
I thought TUS was multi lingual?(not forums)

And didn't we have players from other nations speaking other languages who translated this stuff a while back?

Or do you mean for players reading these forums because it's mostly in English?

Couldn't we setup some sort of automated google translate service?

I just started learning to code so within the next 5 years I expect to become very efficient and will more than likely start doing more things to help out.
Title: Re: should hysteria be moved to the free league?
Post by: Senator on February 01, 2017, 01:12 PM
- Classic league: Elite, Roper, Shopper, Hysteria, BnG
- Rope league: WxW, TTRR, Big RR (luck free schemes for ropers). This league might attract players like Ryan and Masta.
- Team17 in Free league, Big RR out
- a CWT style cup once in a while (Bo5 matches with Elite, Roper, TTRR, BnG and Shopper). Perhaps a separate website dedicated to this cup. This might make Classic league less valued, though, but the same problem is with ONL/CWT and TEL/EAC.
Title: Re: should hysteria be moved to the free league?
Post by: Triad on February 01, 2017, 05:23 PM
People saying Shopper is popular but actually it's not. Here's overall stats:
(http://i.imgur.com/AGT13ff.jpg)

But it's popular around newbies, so it can gain more interest if we divide leagues to amateur and pro.

D1 League:
* Elite
* TTRR
* WxW
* Roper
* Hysteria (less noob friendly like limited petrol)
* a2b BnG

D2 League:
* Light Elite (more noob friendly like it has 5 sec hotseat etc.)
* Big RR
* Shopper
* Roper
* Hysteria
* BnG

Let's get rid of current free league and replace it with something like:
* Darts
* Team17
* Aerial(pls remove crates)
* Boom Race
* Bungee Race
* Kaos
* Abnormal
* an 8th scheme that is fairly popular and doesn't have much or any luck, and it's not Normal or Mole(normal got ONL and CWT, and Mole got Team17 instead)

Bo7 PO for new free league.

Rest excluded schemes can renew interest with cups or TRL.
Title: Re: should hysteria be moved to the free league?
Post by: Sbaffo on February 01, 2017, 05:25 PM
People saying Shopper is popular but actually it's not. Here's overall stats:
(http://i.imgur.com/AGT13ff.jpg)

But it's popular around newbies, so it can gain more interest if we divide leagues to amateur and pro.

D1 League:
* Elite
* TTRR
* WxW
* Roper
* Hysteria (less noob friendly like limited petrol)
* a2b BnG

D2 League:
* Light Elite (more noob friendly like it has 5 sec hotseat etc.)
* Big RR
* Shopper
* Roper
* Hysteria
* BnG

Let's get rid of current free league and replace it with something like:
* Darts
* Team17
* Aerial(pls remove crates)
* Boom Race
* Bungee Race
* Kaos
* Abnormal
* an 8th scheme that is fairly popular and doesn't have much or any luck, and it's not Normal or Mole(normal got ONL and CWT, and Mole got Team17 instead)

Bo7 PO for new free league.

Rest excluded schemes can renew interest with cups or TRL.

Sounds great
Title: Re: should hysteria be moved to the free league?
Post by: Triad on February 01, 2017, 05:37 PM
8th scheme in new Free league can be Bo5 Mine Madness. Because:
* Fast and fun.
* Fairly popular.
* Requires jetpack skills, delicate rope knocks and some fair F3 weapons skills.
* Bo5 removes major luck factor.
Title: Re: should hysteria be moved to the free league?
Post by: Peja on February 01, 2017, 05:43 PM
People saying Shopper is popular but actually it's not. Here's overall stats:
(http://i.imgur.com/AGT13ff.jpg)

But it's popular around newbies, so it can gain more interest if we divide leagues to amateur and pro.

D1 League:
* Elite
* TTRR
* WxW
* Roper
* Hysteria (less noob friendly like limited petrol)
* a2b BnG

D2 League:
* Light Elite (more noob friendly like it has 5 sec hotseat etc.)
* Big RR
* Shopper
* Roper
* Hysteria
* BnG

Let's get rid of current free league and replace it with something like:
* Darts
* Team17
* Aerial(pls remove crates)
* Boom Race
* Bungee Race
* Kaos
* Abnormal
* an 8th scheme that is fairly popular and doesn't have much or any luck, and it's not Normal or Mole(normal got ONL and CWT, and Mole got Team17 instead)

Bo7 PO for new free league.

Rest excluded schemes can renew interest with cups or TRL.

Sounds great

you move from 2 inactive leagues to 3 inactive leagues, mind to elaborate whats so great about this? if you want to save leagues you need fresh blood, to get fresh blood you need to make the concept attractive for newcomers.
- shutdown all leagues on tus
- open one league with supersheeper, mole shopper, shopper, hysteria, team 17, intermediate.
- host a big eac like tourney which takes a year, including cool prices for the remaining  tryhard nerd pros.
- if your league attracts new players, you can reopen a refined classic year after 1 or 2 years.
Title: Re: should hysteria be moved to the free league?
Post by: HHC on February 01, 2017, 05:46 PM
Mine would be:

Standard league:
1) Hysteria
2) Shopper
3) 25/30 sec Elite/Pro/Intermediate
4) Team17/land shopper/Aerial/something BnGish
5) Roper (maybe 20 sec? or somehow dumbed down?)
6) Misc (other schemes when both players agree)
First 5 schemes are PO picks.

Pro league/classic schemes:
limited to 30 players.
1) TTRR
2) Roper
3) BnG
4) Elite
5) Team17 (to balance out rope vs default) with adjustments to minimize crateluck.
6) WxW
First 5 schemes are PO picks.

Freeleague pwned.
Title: Re: should hysteria be moved to the free league?
Post by: Triad on February 01, 2017, 06:05 PM
you move from 2 inactive leagues to 3 inactive leagues, mind to elaborate whats so great about this?
Some new players afraid to play Classic because they're scared from pros. It's like High School Basketball Team vs NBA Team. Division 2 would be like a school till they graduate and join NBA Division 1.

Free League is inactive because it houses shit ton of unnecessary schemes. Smaller Free League like my example would attract more player that looks something different than Classic. At least we can give new Free League a chance, if fails shut permanently.

if you want to save leagues you need fresh blood, to get fresh blood you need to make the concept attractive for newcomers.
- shutdown all leagues on tus
- open one league with supersheeper, mole shopper, shopper, hysteria, team 17, intermediate.
- host a big eac like tourney which takes a year, including cool prices for the remaining  tryhard nerd pros.
- if your league attracts new players, you can reopen a refined classic year after 1 or 2 years.
LMAO. That's like to increase your country's population, you legalize rape and illegalize abortion. You might increase population but current population will get f@#!ed for that.
Title: Re: should hysteria be moved to the free league?
Post by: Sensei on February 01, 2017, 07:04 PM
Free League is inactive because it houses shit ton of unnecessary schemes. Smaller Free League like my example would attract more player that looks something different than Classic. At least we can give new Free League a chance, if fails shut permanently.

When I made thread about smth called "Wild league" few weeks ago, ofc it was more a joke than anything else. I knew mods and community will have a hard time to accept any new unnecesarry stuff in something that already is inactive af.

But small part of that new conception was actually honest and referred to what you said in this post - free league have so many schemes that ppl dislike. Remove 10-15 of them and add 3-4 that are actually being hosted in #ag on daily basis. Elemental?! What the f@#! is that?
Title: Re: should hysteria be moved to the free league?
Post by: TheWalrus on February 01, 2017, 07:31 PM
8th scheme in new Free league can be Bo5 Mine Madness. Because:
* Fast and fun.
* Fairly popular.
* Requires jetpack skills, delicate rope knocks and some fair F3 weapons skills.
* Bo5 removes major luck factor.
haha this guy doesnt include battle race but includes mine madness
Title: Re: should hysteria be moved to the free league?
Post by: Triad on February 01, 2017, 07:46 PM
(http://i.imgur.com/pSiCBeE.jpg)

I based my list on popularity. I didn't pick Plop War because luck placement and map rape, unlike MM which has fixed map.

Battle Race takes time, allows map whoring, and people not interested at it, as you can see above. Mine Madness is fast paced, all explosion and shit attracts newbies and contrary to popular belief it's not luck scheme. When played Bo5 you couldn't beat people like Barman, Zwitter etc.

Title: Re: should hysteria be moved to the free league?
Post by: Sensei on February 01, 2017, 08:48 PM
Out of these 17 games in Pro scheme, 7 of them was played from pure mockery, other 10 cause it was the only way those players would be enlisted on TUS with the word "pro" next to their name.

Plop war is one of the biggest time waster (along with supersheeper) that W:A ppl ever produced.
If it wasn't for you guys, from UC clan, that one would be long forgotten..
Title: Re: should hysteria be moved to the free league?
Post by: nino on February 01, 2017, 08:57 PM
Pro scheme is basicaly dead nowadays but it was very played back in the days.

Still a very tatical scheme imo a side the creates that should die ( dunno if tus pro scheme has cr8 ) same as died in elite ae

Title: Re: should hysteria be moved to the free league?
Post by: ANO on February 01, 2017, 09:06 PM
Che bello non avere un cazzo da fare e scrivere 12 pagine di stronzate e seghe mentali come voi pervertiti luridi su uno schema di merda che ha comunque fatto giocare e un pò divertire vari giocatori. Che coglioni.

•••••••••••••••••

How nice not to have shit to do and write 12 pages of crap and mental saws like you filthy perverts on a shitty scheme that nevertheless did play a little fun and different players. What balls. Let's see how google tranz will whisk you my thoughts

auhauhauhau
Title: Re: should hysteria be moved to the free league?
Post by: avirex on February 01, 2017, 09:11 PM
why are people saying that no one plays the free league, because it has some shitty schemes no1 cares about in it???


can you explain to me what makes you think more people will play the free league, if it had less schemes to choose from??

nobody plays the free leagues, because not many people are interested in the free league, its as simple as that...

taking out 5 or 6 of the least active schemes in the free league today, will not make any body more interested in it tomorrow..  im sorry.
Title: Re: should hysteria be moved to the free league?
Post by: TheWalrus on February 01, 2017, 09:12 PM
why are people saying that no one plays the free league, because it has some shitty schemes no1 cares about in it???


can you explain to me what makes you think more people will play the free league, if it had less schemes to choose from??

nobody plays the free leagues, because not many people are interested in the free league, its as simple as that...

taking out 5 or 6 of the least active schemes in the free league today, will not make any body more interested in it tomorrow..  im sorry.
quoted for truth, there is some feeble ideas being tossed around that ignore the problem
Title: Re: should hysteria be moved to the free league?
Post by: Triad on February 01, 2017, 10:19 PM
Playing free league don't have any serious competition, especially on PO. Finish league higher position and seal the deal on Bo5 PO. For example piki dominated free league. He mastered 6-7 schemes (Abnormal, Darts, Normal etc. just look at his free overall to get the idea) and was fairly good at few others so he picked 3 schemes based on opponent and gg. Not to mention some schemes that allows massive map whoring with luck factor such as Plop War. Just like why people complaining about 3x rope or 3x default picks to win Classic PO.  Fewer schemes will make it more credible with Bo7 PO.

Yeah, it might not bring extra more players, but I would be willing to play it more by knowing there are less schemes so I have chance in PO even if I don't finish season #1.

Why I thought it can attract newcomers is fewer schemes might be better for newcomers because there will be less schemes they'll have to learn, and most of them being fast paced, easy to learn and entertaining. I mean would a newbie interested with something monotonous like BattleRace or Elemental? Something like Mine Madness where you blow shit up, Abnormal and Boom Race where you shoot yourself to win, a different default scheme approach like Aerial and Kaos etc. sounds far more interesting. And the fact these schemes are played more proves it.
Title: Re: should hysteria be moved to the free league?
Post by: Sensei on February 01, 2017, 11:34 PM
Avirex, free league (until maybe last 2 seasons) was just a lil bit lower than Classic according to number of players participating. I'm not making it up, you have season's informations on TUS. But it's easier to speak shit on forums before doing any research.

Only difference is it's relaxing, fun league, not abused by 10 same ppl raping it every season (it slowly becoming such), not cause love of the game but to catch 80 apperances and be in run for the big prize. It's obvious with all the drama involved in it, including free wins, avoiding, noobashing.. etc.

Can you at least give your reasons why you have anything against making few changes which Free desperately needs and which few of us active ones want for our sake, without harming any other part of TUS, mainly talking about Classic league and it's players. Seriously, what's in it for you?
Title: Re: should hysteria be moved to the free league?
Post by: avirex on February 02, 2017, 12:00 AM
Sensei, who said i have anything against it?? i asked a question.

Triad answered the question.

what are you talking about?? do you even know? lol
Title: Re: should hysteria be moved to the free league?
Post by: TheWalrus on February 02, 2017, 12:01 AM

I based my list on popularity. I didn't pick Plop War because luck placement and map rape, unlike MM which has fixed map.

Battle Race takes time, allows map whoring, and people not interested at it, as you can see above. Mine Madness is fast paced, all explosion and shit attracts newbies and contrary to popular belief it's not luck scheme. When played Bo5 you couldn't beat people like Barman, Zwitter etc.
mine madness is terrible, its not a skill scheme and will never be a skill scheme

but you are entitled to your noobish opinion

battlerace has had 3 leagues made JUST for the battlerace scheme, how many for mine madness?

just curious

just realized this was a bit mean, triad you are cool bud, didn't mean to call you a noob but then i did
Title: Re: should hysteria be moved to the free league?
Post by: TheKomodo on February 02, 2017, 01:20 AM
I like more TFL schemes than I do Classic, but stuff like BattleRace and SuperSheeper, Elemental, and some others is so horrendously boring for me I'd literally rather die than compete seriously.

A cropped TFL would be awesome but I don't think we would agree what schemes to use.

Oh and imo MM is very skilled when players like barman vs hurz but then again it bores the sht out me.
Title: Re: should hysteria be moved to the free league?
Post by: Triad on February 02, 2017, 09:00 AM
Actually that 8 schemes was based on Team17 becoming part of Free and Big RR becoming part of D2 Classic. If Classic will stay same as it is then we don't need MM. It would be:

* Darts
* Mole Shopper (I really hate it but it seems popular around both WormNET and free league)
* Aerial(pls remove crates)
* Boom Race
* Bungee Race
* Kaos
* Abnormal
* Big RR
Title: Re: should hysteria be moved to the free league?
Post by: Tomi on February 02, 2017, 09:30 AM
Wow this free league looks better then classic ;) however i like mm so it would be cool to have. And also 60 days seasons (if it i not set already) and maybe it would be better when you play a league game to pick one scheme that both players don't want to play
Title: Re: should hysteria be moved to the free league?
Post by: Triad on February 02, 2017, 09:57 AM
Well I  like MM too but it doesn't have any chance against Big RR. Big RR is far more popular and it's completely luck free. Like other excluded schemes, MM can continue gathering people on Cups.

Yeah, if I were to suggest other changes:
* Bo7 Playoffs.
* 60 day deadline just like before.
* Overall reset like Classic league, makes sense considering more than half of schemes are now gone.
* Doing any necessary changes to improve schemes, like removing crates from Aerial. I mean Jesus, people get Banana Bomb or Homing Bird from crates.
Title: Re: should hysteria be moved to the free league?
Post by: Sensei on February 02, 2017, 10:51 AM
I know we said TFL has too many schemes that ppl dislike, but why limiting it on 8 like classic? Imo, triad, there should be at least 12-13 schemes in it.

You removed JPR and Inter for some reason!? :/
Golf is a good fun for example, only con is small amount of maps atm.
Why not add few more competitive and fast paced schemes like drown syndrome and kaos shopper?
Title: Re: should hysteria be moved to the free league?
Post by: TheKomodo on February 02, 2017, 10:52 AM
Actually that 8 schemes was based on Team17 becoming part of Free and Big RR becoming part of D2 Classic. If Classic will stay same as it is then we don't need MM. It would be:

* Darts
* Mole Shopper (I really hate it but it seems popular around both WormNET and free league)
* Aerial(pls remove crates)
* Boom Race
* Bungee Race
* Kaos
* Abnormal
* Big RR

You can't have Kaos because it requires rubberworm, and League should be as simple as possible for newcomers, it shouldn't require to install an add-on to play should it?

If Kaos didn't require rubber, and you removed Mole Shopper, sounds like an amazing lineup.

I'd replace Kaos and Mole Shopper with Forts and a faster paced Intermediate scheme(Bo1 not Bo3).

^^ Personally speaking, i'd fkn love that league :D

So mine:

* Darts
* Intermediate(Bo1 not Bo3, with changes to make this work)
* Aerial(pls remove crates)
* Boom Race
* Bungee Race
* Forts
* Abnormal
* Big RR
Title: Re: should hysteria be moved to the free league?
Post by: Mega`Adnan on February 02, 2017, 11:23 AM
Rofl! People started to give ideas of league plans in the thread of Hysteria and Classic/Free league. Rename this thread to "League ideas", and remove the poll.
.
.
.
.
So, what's the conclusion now?
Title: Re: should hysteria be moved to the free league?
Post by: Sensei on February 02, 2017, 11:28 AM
It's the same subject adnan. Clearly ppl don't want hyst in Free.
Title: Re: should hysteria be moved to the free league?
Post by: Triad on February 02, 2017, 11:38 AM
I know we said TFL has too many schemes that ppl dislike, but why limiting it on 8 like classic? Imo, triad, there should be at least 12-13 schemes in it.
Reason I wanted 8 schemes is to make Free as competitive and compact as possible. In a Bo7 4:3 PO game, 7 out of 8 would be played. If you have a lot scheme, you'll stick with your favorite ones and ignore other schemes just like currently on TFL. That's why having 8 schemes might motivate players to master all Free schemes.

You removed JPR and Inter for some reason!? :/
Golf is a good fun for example, only con is small amount of maps atm.
Why not add few more competitive and fast paced schemes like drown syndrome and kaos shopper?
Yeah, I didn't add Intermediate because I thought it gets attention it deserves already via ONL and CWT. Beside, Abnormal is pretty similiar and more interesting for newbies. But I wouldn't mind if everyone wanted it in, it's a good scheme.

I didn't add golf other racing schemes because they're not popular and/or they have small amount of maps which makes map whoring a lot easier. I know these schemes are luck free and fun, I love em too, but they can do just fine on Cups.

You can't have Kaos because it requires rubberworm, and League should be as simple as possible for newcomers, it shouldn't require to install an add-on to play should it?

If Kaos didn't require rubber, and you removed Mole Shopper, sounds like an amazing lineup.
Fair point for Kaos, I would be fine whether you keep it or not.

I can't talk objectively about Mole, I don't like it. I added because it had fair amount of games played overall, but big portion of it might be Zalo and his friends. Again, personally I would be fine whether you keep it or not.
Title: Re: should hysteria be moved to the free league?
Post by: WTF-8 on February 02, 2017, 11:27 PM
Big RR is far more popular and it's completely luck free.
The problem I have with turn-based RR is that even if both players fail and lose their turn at the exactly same spot on the map, they are likely to lose different amount of turn time depending on how much turn time they had left, ranging from one second to almost full turn. That is, very different weight of punishment for exactly same mistake, with the lesser one going to whoever was lucky to have the least turn time left.

Another problem are long vertical climbs, like those that require a half of a turn to get up. If you enter this area with 10 seconds left, you can't climb high enough and will fall back, resulting in those 10 seconds being taken away for an unwelcome reason. Such a situation does look like bad luck.
(Hmmm maybe if it was possible to save turn time left to use it on the next turn (http://feedback.worms2d.info/forums/5998-worms-armageddon/suggestions/17930299-skipping-a-turn-gives-remaining-time-as-extra-time)...)

You can't have Kaos because it requires rubberworm, and League should be as simple as possible for newcomers, it shouldn't require to install an add-on to play should it?
Installing RubberWorm is as simple as downloading the installer (http://myfiles.my1.ru/wa/wk/RubberWorm-00117-L-installer.rar), launching it, Next, Next, Next, Install, done. It's 2017 there's hardly any reason to not have it installed; intentionally demoting one of the best and accessible modules makes no sense and limits the possibilities of a league.
Title: Re: should hysteria be moved to the free league?
Post by: Sensei on February 03, 2017, 12:13 AM
Well, wtf8, skipping a turn to save those seconds in the next turn would be appropriate ONLY in that, not so meaningful, situation when there's a 10-15 sec climb in Big RR. Not that is meaningful, but there are very few maps with those parts. (Tower Race basically noone ever play in league)

Imagine this placed in all other schemes when darksider skips 10 turns just to get enough time to get out-attack-crawl back in the hole-repeat.

Let's just hope realtime races will be part of W:A someday. Until then, be grateful ;)
Title: Re: should hysteria be moved to the free league?
Post by: TheKomodo on February 03, 2017, 11:00 AM
Installing RubberWorm is as simple as downloading the installer (http://myfiles.my1.ru/wa/wk/RubberWorm-00117-L-installer.rar), launching it, Next, Next, Next, Install, done. It's 2017 there's hardly any reason to not have it installed; intentionally demoting one of the best and accessible modules makes no sense and limits the possibilities of a league.

That's easy for you and me to say, but unfortunately my point still stands regardless how you feel about it.

I know how easy it is to install, but I choose not to use it on THIS laptop.

Until rubberworm comes standard with WA, you can't expect people to install it as an add-on / mod.
Title: Re: should hysteria be moved to the free league?
Post by: Sensei on February 03, 2017, 11:27 AM
Komo, if new players already are registered on TUS and starting to play league, I think they're come around and ask 1 of 100 active forum members what they need to play Kaos scheme. Which makes installing rubberworm not a problem at all.

And pls, we're waiting on story why you don't want to install rubber on THAT laptop...
Title: Re: should hysteria be moved to the free league?
Post by: TheKomodo on February 03, 2017, 03:43 PM
Sensei, most people will install it, I have it installed on my other computers, just not THIS one, some people just don't want extras installed, as simple as that, just accept it and stop complaining.

You shouldn't have to install an extra program to play a League where the rest don't require it...
Title: Re: should hysteria be moved to the free league?
Post by: avirex on February 03, 2017, 07:31 PM
I am kind of curious why you don't have it installed on THAT (lol) laptop too komo

There is nothing negative associated with rubber... there is no reason not to have it... you mentioned in other parts, you use a different computer to install rubber, in the case you ever want to test a rubber scheme, or watch a replay... it's very strange...

I'm yet to see anyone else in the same situation you are.

Also, I would imagine that newbs are more likely to discover most schemes, and most add ons before they discover TUS.

Look at project X for example, that was more popular with newer players, then it ever was with TUS players.... (ooo shot here comes another debate)

Anyway, I'm very curious why you don't have rubber installed on THAT LAPTOP ... I'm guessing you actually do, you just won't admit it.. and I don't expect you to.
Title: Re: should hysteria be moved to the free league?
Post by: TheKomodo on February 03, 2017, 07:40 PM
There is nothing negative associated with rubber... there is no reason not to have it...

True :)
Title: Re: should hysteria be moved to the free league?
Post by: Peja on February 03, 2017, 08:01 PM
You shouldn't have to install an extra program to play a League where the rest don't require it...
agreed
Title: Re: Worms Armageddon - Has it died?
Post by: Sensei on February 03, 2017, 08:10 PM
When 4.0 gets available, I'm creating a poll whether it should be implemented in W:A.
Don't want some shitty third party update that's bringing smth new to my beloved game directory!
Title: Re: should hysteria be moved to the free league?
Post by: TheKomodo on February 03, 2017, 09:04 PM
I thought rubber was gonna be in 4.0 already? Or at least the features it uses will be available in 4.0?

Title: Re: should hysteria be moved to the free league?
Post by: Prince_Egypt on February 04, 2017, 04:49 AM
 :-X :-\ :-\  Of course NO !
Title: Re: should hysteria be moved to the free league?
Post by: Korydex on February 04, 2017, 08:20 PM

roper, shoppa, elite, t17, bng  (imo those are the classic schemes, and others should not be in classic.. but thats just my opinion)
Elite / Roper / T17 / RR / Shoppa / BnG are classic schemes!
- Classic league: Elite, Roper, Shopper, Hysteria, BnG
- Rope league: WxW, TTRR, Big RR (luck free schemes for ropers). This league might attract players like Ryan and Masta.
- Team17 in Free league, Big RR out
- a CWT style cup once in a while (Bo5 matches with Elite, Roper, TTRR, BnG and Shopper). Perhaps a separate website dedicated to this cup. This might make Classic league less valued, though, but the same problem is with ONL/CWT and TEL/EAC.
D1 League:
* Elite
* TTRR
* WxW
* Roper
* Hysteria (less noob friendly like limited petrol)
* a2b BnG

D2 League:
* Light Elite (more noob friendly like it has 5 sec hotseat etc.)
* Big RR
* Shopper
* Roper
* Hysteria
* BnG
Standard league:
1) Hysteria
2) Shopper
3) 25/30 sec Elite/Pro/Intermediate
4) Team17/land shopper/Aerial/something BnGish
5) Roper (maybe 20 sec? or somehow dumbed down?)
6) Misc (other schemes when both players agree)
First 5 schemes are PO picks.

Pro league/classic schemes:
limited to 30 players.
1) TTRR
2) Roper
3) BnG
4) Elite
5) Team17 (to balance out rope vs default) with adjustments to minimize crateluck.
6) WxW
First 5 schemes are PO picks.

Freeleague pwned.

so these are the posts i found constructive. i guess it's time to lock this thread?
Title: Re: should hysteria be moved to the free league?
Post by: Senator on February 19, 2017, 11:40 AM
The scheme list would need some balancing anyway. You can say we have 4 ropes and 4 defaults but a better classification would be rope, default and bng:

rope: WxW, TTRR, Roper, (Shopper)
default: Elite, Team17
bng: BnG, (Hysteria)

3 pure rope schemes, 2 pure default schemes and 1 pure bng scheme. A half rope, half default scheme (Shopper) and a half bng, half default scheme (Hysteria) on top of that.

An easy fix would be to put Roper and WxW in one scheme class, perhaps this way:

Roper / WxW*

*Roper is the default. If both players agree, you can play WxW instead.

Roper and WxW would have shared season class but separate overall ratings (when you play WxW, you gain/lose season points based on the opponent's WxW overall rating etc).

I don't think merging Roper and WxW is enough if you want to even out the playing field, though. TTRR is still too much for bad ropers.
Title: Re: should hysteria be moved to the free league?
Post by: Korydex on February 19, 2017, 05:24 PM
elite t17 bng roper as the real classic schemes + rr + br to even it out.

Spoiler! View
(https://retrogad.files.wordpress.com/2017/02/trollface.png)
Title: Re: should hysteria be moved to the free league?
Post by: HHC on February 19, 2017, 05:30 PM
Thank you for using spoilers at least komodex  :D
Title: Re: should hysteria be moved to the free league?
Post by: NinjaCamel on February 19, 2017, 09:00 PM
nice topic guys! ill read it and vote asap
Title: Re: should hysteria be moved to the free league?
Post by: Korydex on February 20, 2017, 04:01 PM
elite t17 bng roper as the real classic schemes + rr + br to even it out.
actually now i think that golf could be added to that as well as the 'racing' scheme for bng players. it's not really classic scheme i guess, but anyway it would be more fair to bngers to have it in.
that or get rid of racing schemes completely, just get back to the beginning with only elite, t17, bng and rope. but that would be boring for a lot of players i believe. that's like asking people to play some old interactive fiction games or asking them to watch silent movies...