Forums
April 28, 2024, 01:40 PM

Author Topic: Clanners messed up 2  (Read 8839 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Re: Clanners messed up 2
« Reply #105 on: August 18, 2010, 06:16 PM »
It's not about twisting words, Komo.

First off, I'd like to say I completely agree with this:

If you don't like me, fine, but stop bringing up the past please...

But then you do this:
And BEFORE you assume, I am not referring to CF, I am talking about EVERYONE...
And your very next post:
True, but CF is pretty inactive - all the time, and seeing as they make playoffs every time, and rarely play, it's kind of hard to play them

How about both of you let bygones be bygones?

Re: Clanners messed up 2
« Reply #106 on: August 18, 2010, 06:39 PM »
If no one agrees with me, fair enough lol, i'll always still think that ONLY the most active and better clans should qualify...

I totally agree with that :). This should be a ratio between activity and result. And as it was it was too much balanced on result imo. Activity (and so gamble) wasn't enough rewarded. Now I think it's allright. TdC is not active this season and should not be qualified for next PO good or bad result.

Offline TheKomodo

Re: Clanners messed up 2
« Reply #107 on: August 18, 2010, 08:39 PM »
It's not about twisting words, Komo.

First off, I'd like to say I completely agree with this:

If you don't like me, fine, but stop bringing up the past please...

But then you do this:
And BEFORE you assume, I am not referring to CF, I am talking about EVERYONE...
And your very next post:
True, but CF is pretty inactive - all the time, and seeing as they make playoffs every time, and rarely play, it's kind of hard to play them

How about both of you let bygones be bygones?

I wasn't talking about CF the 1st time, And I would be more than happy to be he won't anyway it doens't matter, it's over.