Clanners messed up 2

[TheKomodo]

I am making a new thread with this, because no one is threatening anyone else, no one is even swearing or using extreme insults, I see worse debates on TV with professional politicians being mor einsulting and using more vulgor language.  

We are keeping this more civilised than practically any other thread with a heated debate like this so there is absolutely NO need to close and lock this thread, we are NOT kids, we do NOT need your petty supervision ok?

If you choose to lock this again when theres nothing even wrong, then you lose my respect as a friend, you can at least let CF answer my question:

CF, can you PLEASE try and clan us (CKC) a bit more please?


Edit here:

Oh and D1/MI etc, what about the idea a few of us mentioned about raising the win percentage and or the amount of games needed to qualify, can we have a vote or something?

[zippeurfou]

Komo, could you see stop with the cf case. They can read, they understood your point, there's no need to continu spaming them. The only thing you will win is getting avoided because they won't enjoy play with you (or feel like it). More over, sending pm for this kind of discution is  imo better than general loud.

Edit here:

Oh and D1/MI etc, what about the idea a few of us mentioned about raising the win percentage and or the amount of games needed to qualify, can we have a vote or something?

As I said before, I think the clanner league is enough active to increase the number of game requiered per season. I'd like to hear what think some clan league moderators.

[Crash]

this is true, clan doH too not only tdc -.-

[TheKomodo]

Well I don't see why zipp, darKz personally knows i'm a generally nice bloke to play, I don't spam ingame etc or insult, anyway, can we progress with the actual vote thing?

[DarkOne]

If you choose to lock this again when theres nothing even wrong, then you lose my respect as a friend, you can at least let CF answer my question:

I locked it because I felt an everybody-vs-CF thread served no purpose other than to annoy people (mostly CF).

to quote zippeurfou:

Komo, could you see stop with the cf case. They can read, they understood your point, there's no need to continu spaming them. The only thing you will win is getting avoided because they won't enjoy play with you (or feel like it). More over, sending pm for this kind of discution is  imo better than general loud.

MI is the one in charge of the league, so only he can answer what to will happen to the league.
Did you mean winning percentage as a key requirement or as the main reason for qualifying at all?
I personally feel winning percentage shouldn't count for the reason mentioned in the other thread, but my opinion could of course be wrong entirely

As for the minimum amount of games required: I don't know. What would you feel is a reasonable number?

And keep in mind: of the 20 clans that played in season 13, only 8 played more than 60 games.

[TheKomodo]

Yeah D1 only 8 did, but 8 is good, and should be the best 4 of those 8 that make the final cut.

I think 100 games is fair, 100 games in like 45 days, is easy, more than easy, thats more or less 2 games a day and a few days 3-4, SO easy, if you can't manage that then somethings wrong lol.

I think the winning percentage should be at least 60%

[Csongi]

100 too much imo...

[DarkOne]

If 100 games had been the minimum, then 5 clans would've been eligible for the playoffs in season 13.

edit: if you also include the 60% winning ratio, then 2 of those clans would no longer be eligible (including TdC, but we both know they deserved their playoff spot)

[TheKomodo]

Yes but remember a few clans are playing the minimum amount of games required for playoffs, if you raise it, they will play more.

60% is fine, alot of clans do 60+ every season.

[avirex]

edit: if you also include the 60% winning ratio, then 2 of those clans would no longer be eligible (including TdC, but we both know they deserved their playoff spot)

if they did not get atleast 60% then maybe they dont deserve the spot...    but thats just my opinion...

[TheKomodo]

What avi said, I honestly think this is justified, and i'm not just saying that because CKC always get at least 60% it's true, a clan that deserves playoffs should meet high requirements, after all it's supposed to be the best clans who make it isn't it?

[zippeurfou]

Well, imo raisin the win percentage is not that good. This will just increase the noob bashing + avoiding.
But the max number of game is good. 100 game is not that much. There are some clan who seems to play the minimum number of game to reach po in order to keep their rating (as some may suggest). If you increase the number of game they'll have to play more and i'm sure they will .
I think, it's worth testing. We are in vacation period if you can get clan play that much, this mean they'll be able to play that much at any time during the year .

[TheKomodo]

Thanks for the input zipp, i'm glad we're finally getting somewhere, can we make this an official post?

[MonkeyIsland]

As zipp stated, increasing 50% will bring us noob bashing and avoiding. But I guess we can make number of games up to 80 games.

[TheKomodo]

Can we at least try 90 MI?

Either way, thank you.