I sincerely have a problem with people trying to make their point with "look at what we don't know!". If you can't make your point with things you know/can explain/can reason, then you don't have a point.
We make our conclusions on the things we know, not on the things we don't know. If we're going to make conclusions based on what we don't know, then nobody can function at any job/project/hobby/whatever. It's not a hasty conclusion if all the evidence points to a certain conclusion.
I don't know how to make myself being understood (it's goddamn rare tho)...
It's not a "look at what we don't know", or it is, but also without being.
Let me give you an easy example:
Long time ago, people used to think the earth was flat, why ?
Because when they were looking at the horizon, there were seeing a flat land far as the eyes.
They used your way of thinking: the "look at what we have". But that doesn't mean you're right.
Cause first, you could be missing clues (what I'm hardly pointing on) and second, your clues could be false.
This is a point, weither you can admit it or not.
About using "supernatural" as an argument. Can anyone explain the difference between supernatural and magic? If you can't explain it, then that means you would be using magic as an argument - do you really want to do that?
Yes I do, and that's what I meant, I just used "scientific" word not to bother you.
You read my subject on the "supernatural" things I lived, so if you understood, you would understand my point (even if you don't believe it).
Anyway, I guess you feel like when someone tell me "god exists".
They're saying god exists without having any proofs or even having seen something related to it. So it's stupid to believe in something so abstract (otherwise it has never been prooven that birds couldn't be aliens, so let's all kill the birds !).
BUT, I did (weither it was hallucination or not, I did, you can't deny it). I'm not saying this is true, but since I saw some things incredible, it's not my base, but I can't discard it.
I'm just trying to show you I already took this fact in consideration.
So you can't just call a thing that has already been excluded (I'm sure you won't get me now xD).
EVERYTHING I'M ABOUT TO SAY IS MY OPINION ONLY. I'm not trying to force feed anyone anything.. but I understand these are tender subjects so I wanted to make sure everyone understands this.
Lol. xD
Dude, my pre-last post wasn't pointing you tho, but another guy calling others "crazy" because he had different thoughs (which wasn't you).
So you don't have to tell such things.
Anyway, I didn't fully get your post, but I'm
highly interested on what you said.
So if you could make me a very short summary (don't want to bother you), I would thank you pretty much.
"Look at what we don't know" in combination with "what if.." Yeah, it's hard to communicate with those ppl.. It's like those astrology guys/chicks.. Hard to explain anyshit and after some time U give up and let them be.
And just for the record, there's three of "what if" in Abnax 1 simple question.. .. .
There's a saying here about those "what if's"... says "If grandma had a dick she would be grandpa!" ;x
Don't take hasty conclusions. Especially cause you're digging yourself into the pit (cause most of the time, you don't understand me and so you start spreading stupid conclusions).
You don't like me, I don't like the way you're argumenting/talking, that's fine. Just shut up together.
Plus, do you really think we would know what we currently know if some physicians & philosophers weren't "looking at what we don't know" and using the "what if" ?
If I remember well, that was one of the basic methods of Einstein. And it led him to the string theory for example.
PS: I heard a scientist found a particle which could go faster than the light (which is supposed to be the fastest, and almost every researches and the physic is based on so: which would lead to a total remake of physic if it was false), and they are making a particle accelerator big enough to proove so (in asia if I remember well).
I heard that on a scientific documentary, so except if I missunderstood some things, you can't tell I dreamed it.
PSS: D1, I'd like to have your opinion about "magnetisers" ?
Not that I believe it is real and works, I'll give you a funny anecdote.