Future of Feature of W:A schemes?

[Mega`Adnan]

PX is f@#!ing shit. Who likes PX just traitors of Worms Armageddon.

Actually! You are the one who is traitor and shit!

[Statik]

Did you mean "Future of W:A schemes"? ^^

[PyroMan]

Did you mean "Future of W:A schemes"? ^^

I`m also want to read like that each when reading topic name))))
But it is about feature kind of rpg lib, that can be attached to any scheme as an additional feature

[Impossible]

@statik I changed the name a bit. Everyone should be happy now xD

[Statik]

You need to go deeper!

[LeTotalKiller]

well its not hard to rename wkpx to !wkpx, you can even write bat file that will rename px module automatically for you.

I'd not want to restart the game if it turns out there's no PX player around if I had PX on, or if it turns there are nice PX players around if had PX off. (Don't tell me a bat file would allow toggling PX on the fly during a game session, does it?) I don't go through such a hassle with RubberWorm, just saying.

[PyroMan]

i have 3.6.31 with PX active all the time, no matter which scheme i play - px or not. Its just enabled always. I dont have any problems and happy with that.
Also there are some people who do exact same thing. sK`Heisenberg, for example.
Does it somehow affects on my roping/other skills? I say no.