Forums
April 26, 2024, 02:21 PM

Author Topic: Comparison of T17 schemes (for MI)  (Read 6488 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Re: Comparison of T17 schemes (for MI)
« Reply #45 on: January 18, 2012, 11:54 AM »
1. not attack first turn .
2. all have one gun water (ss or homing )
3. deleted nuclear and earthquake ( These 2 weapons often surprise )
4. meaby deleted freeze and scaled
5. One change in the worm from the beginning of the game available

my sugestion


Offline Hussar

Re: Comparison of T17 schemes (for MI)
« Reply #46 on: January 18, 2012, 11:59 AM »
1. not attack first turn .
2. all have one gun water (ss or homing )
3. deleted nuclear and earthquake ( These 2 weapons often surprise )
4. meaby deleted freeze and scaled
5. One change in the worm from the beginning of the game available

my sugestion




i prefer........

1. not attack first turn . (ye  its suck when u have 3 worms at begin near water)
2. all have one gun water (ss or homing )
3. deleted nuclear and earthquake ( These 2 weapons often surprise )
4. meaby deleted freeze and scaled
5. One change in the worm from the beginning of the game available

+

..and more ballanced power of wepons like in HHC sheme.
« Last Edit: January 18, 2012, 12:01 PM by Berria »

Offline Throsti

  • I am just Throsti
  • Hero Member
  • *****

  • Poland Poland
  • Pn Pn clan

  • Posts: 1,101
  • PaweÅ‚ Abramowicz.
    • View Profile
    • My Facebook.
Re: Comparison of T17 schemes (for MI)
« Reply #47 on: January 18, 2012, 12:00 PM »
1. not attack first turn .
2. all have one gun water (ss or homing )
3. deleted nuclear and earthquake ( These 2 weapons often surprise )
4. meaby deleted freeze and scaled
5. One change in the worm from the beginning of the game available

my sugestion



>>> And afr maybe?

Offline Phanton

Re: Comparison of T17 schemes (for MI)
« Reply #48 on: January 18, 2012, 08:22 PM »
no change scheme....


he is good as well
Miss, old's players..... Miss, old's times :)

Offline Abnaxus

Re: Comparison of T17 schemes (for MI)
« Reply #49 on: January 19, 2012, 10:37 AM »
1. not attack first turn . (ye  its suck when u have 3 worms at begin near water)
2. all have one gun water (ss or homing )
As it's what I proposed, I totally agree with that. :)
Watashi wa, jinmei ni iku sa reru ka o kakunin surunoni nagai jikan o matteita.
Shikashi, tada nariyuki o mimamoru.
Jikan dake to iudarou gen'in to naru.

May the force be with you.

Offline Throsti

  • I am just Throsti
  • Hero Member
  • *****

  • Poland Poland
  • Pn Pn clan

  • Posts: 1,101
  • PaweÅ‚ Abramowicz.
    • View Profile
    • My Facebook.
Re: Comparison of T17 schemes (for MI)
« Reply #50 on: January 19, 2012, 11:21 AM »
no change scheme....


he is good as well

>>> SIgned Dougi

Re: Comparison of T17 schemes (for MI)
« Reply #51 on: January 19, 2012, 11:40 AM »
why not delete4d nuclear and earthquake . I only  hear when i use this f@#! off or f@#!ing lucky scheme etc. 

Offline Peja

Re: Comparison of T17 schemes (for MI)
« Reply #52 on: January 19, 2012, 11:53 AM »
simply because these weapons are quite easy to defend

Offline Phanton

Re: Comparison of T17 schemes (for MI)
« Reply #53 on: January 19, 2012, 03:12 PM »
why not delete4d nuclear and earthquake . I only  hear when i use this f@#! off or f@#!ing lucky scheme etc. 

this yes
Miss, old's players..... Miss, old's times :)

Offline Abnaxus

Re: Comparison of T17 schemes (for MI)
« Reply #54 on: January 19, 2012, 03:38 PM »
Nuclear & Earthquake are very strategic weapons.

One you need to set yourself as high as possible.
The other you have to protect your worm with girders/"land holes".

If you remove those, you remove a big part of T17 strategy.

It's easy to void those weapons, whereas it's impossible with Patxy.
Watashi wa, jinmei ni iku sa reru ka o kakunin surunoni nagai jikan o matteita.
Shikashi, tada nariyuki o mimamoru.
Jikan dake to iudarou gen'in to naru.

May the force be with you.