oh jeez crazy... thnx for stirring the pot... lol
SPW, crazy is joking, he is taking a stab at me... if he truly believes getting rank 1 is possible, im not sure...
but statik knows exactly what im talking about... and even if i do play statik, and crazy who are in top 10 with me (i think im still in top 10?) then i can only achieve their rank with time...
i can not get to rank 1, without having 95% win or better... but most of top10 only have between 60-80% wins... do you guys really have trouble seeing the problem here??? only me and statik see the issue?
and komo too!! *high five*
ps: holy shit, i dropped to rank 16... not even a week ago, i was 1 rank above u crazy... i think i lost 2 games to reN, theres like -150 right there.... anyway, im not complaining, and i really dont care if the system gets changed or not.. im just pointing out what i think is the obvious, that the current overall system is not accurate.
i cant believe im saying this, but komo is right... they should be called over-all historical standings lol....